Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Abdominal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03234543

Last Updated: 2019-02-25

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 100 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2017-10-08
• Study Completion Date: 2020-06-15

Brief Summary

This phase II randomized (1:1) controlled trial will examine the effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) on the outcomes of major abdominal surgery. One hundred subjects will be enrolled at a single institution - University Hospital - Newark. The study population are patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (anticipated to be >/= 2 hrs long with a hospital stay >/= 2 days). Subjects in the treatment group will receive lower limb ischemic conditioning at 3 different time points: before surgery, POD 1 and POD 2. The primary outcome is the 30-day comprehensive complications index (CCI). Key secondary outcomes are changes in systemic inflammatory markers in peripheral blood and 30-day mortality.

Detailed Description

STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:

1. To obtain preliminary data regarding postoperative complications in subjects undergoing abdominal surgery and receiving remote limb ischemic or sham conditioning.

2. To test whether remote limb ischemic conditioning (RIC) decreases systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

HYPOTHESiS:

The central hypothesis of the research is that pre- and post-operative RIC in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery would decrease the systemic inflammatory response to major abdominal surgery and decrease postoperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN:

A prospective, randomized, double - masked clinical trial of RIC will be conducted in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at University Hospital in Newark, NJ. Participants will be randomized into two groups: RIC and No RIC. RIC will be induced at three time points - the first after anesthesia induction but before commencement of surgery, and the second and the third on post-operative days 1 and 2, respectively. The RIC intervention consists of 5 minutes of inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet placed mid-thigh followed by 5 minutes of deflation, repeated for 3 cycles. The pressure used will be 250 mmHg for the pre-operative intervention. Subsequent tourniquet pressures will be 50 mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure. The No RIC group will receive a sham intervention at all the same time points. The thigh tourniquet will be inflated to only 20 mmHg. A Doppler probe will be used to assess pedal arterial flow in both groups. Blood samples will be collected at baseline, 1hr after skin closure, and 1hr after interventions 2 and 3.

STUDY POPULATION:

Adults (> 18 years of age) of both sexes scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery at University Hospital will be considered for inclusion. Major abdominal surgery is defined as peritoneal, retroperitoneal and pelvic surgery expected to last >/= 120 minutes (from incision to closure) with an expected hospital stay >/= 2 days. A list of surgeries considered for inclusion is included as Appendix A. Additional operations will be considered for inclusion if the study team and primary surgical team both agree that the procedure is a major abdominal surgery and that the duration of surgery is likely to be > 2 hours.

RISKS AND BENEFITS

1. Risks to Subjects During inflation of the tourniquet in awake patients (post-op), there is a risk of pain secondary to tourniquet inflation. The investigators believe this risk is small, and if it occurs, the patient will have the option to discontinue the intervention.

There is a theoretical risk of injury to the limb receiving the RIC stimulus. However, such occurrences have not been reported to date in other clinical studies.

During collection of blood samples, there is a theoretical risk of bleeding from the venipuncture site; however this risk is no greater than routine blood draw. The amount of blood drawn for study purposes will be small (less than 50 mL total anticipated).

2. Benefits to Subjects The anticipated benefit to subjects is fewer complications after major abdominal surgery. However, no such benefit may accrue. In addition, the study is expected to provide valuable information regarding how RIC might modulate stress response to major surgery.

Conditions

Laparotomy; Laparoscopy; Retroperitoneal Disease; Pelvis Disease; Pancreatic Diseases; Liver Diseases; Gastrointestinal Disease; Urologic Diseases; Complication of Surgical Procedure

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: TRIPLE

Study Groups

Remote Ischemic Conditioning

The RIC intervention consists of 5 minutes of inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet placed mid-thigh followed by 5 minutes of deflation, repeated for 3 cycles. The pressure used will be 250 mmHg for the pre-operative intervention. Subsequent tourniquet pressures will be 50 mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Remote ischemic conditioning

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Placement of blood pressure cuff to lower extremity in order to induce temporary and reversible ischemia.

No Remote Ischemic Conditioning

The No RIC group will receive a sham intervention at all the same time points. The thigh tourniquet will be inflated to only 20 mmHg (to mask the intervention from the subject).

Group Type: SHAM_COMPARATOR

No Remote ischemic conditioning

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Placement of blood pressure cuff to lower extremity with minimal inflation without inducing ischemia.

Interventions

Remote ischemic conditioning

Placement of blood pressure cuff to lower extremity in order to induce temporary and reversible ischemia.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

No Remote ischemic conditioning

Placement of blood pressure cuff to lower extremity with minimal inflation without inducing ischemia.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults (> 18 years of age)

2. Both genders

3. Undergoing major abdominal surgery as above

4. Elective surgeries

5. Both outpatients and in-hospital patients

6. Post-op length of stay expected to be at least 2 days by the primary surgical service

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects with lower extremity paralysis

2. Lower extremity amputees

3. Known, documented peripheral arterial disease

4. Body mass index > 45

5. Pregnancy

6. Trauma patients

7. Organ transplant recipients

8. Prior major surgery during current hospitalization (for instance, a patient undergoing re-laparotomy for a complication from a previous procedure)

9. Patient taking sulfonylureas or nitrates prior to or during admission (listed in Appendix B)

a. These subjects are excluded because sulfonylureas are shown to abrogate the RIC effect whereas nitrates are shown to mimic the RIC effect in animal models.

10. Non-elective surgeries (urgent or emergent surgeries)

11. General surgical procedures with no planned intra-abdominal component

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Baburao Koneru, MD, MPH

Professor of Surgery

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Baburao Koneru, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rutgers-NJMS

Locations

University Hospital

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Countries

United States

References

Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23728278 (View on PubMed)

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15273542 (View on PubMed)

Lausevic Z, Lausevic M, Trbojevic-Stankovic J, Krstic S, Stojimirovic B. Predicting multiple organ failure in patients with severe trauma. Can J Surg. 2008 Apr;51(2):97-102.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18377749 (View on PubMed)

Kvarnstrom AL, Sarbinowski RT, Bengtson JP, Jacobsson LM, Bengtsson AL. Complement activation and interleukin response in major abdominal surgery. Scand J Immunol. 2012 May;75(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02672.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22229650 (View on PubMed)

Kvarnstrom A, Sokolov A, Swartling T, Kurlberg G, Mollnes TE, Bengtsson A. Alternative pathway activation of complement in laparoscopic and open rectal surgery. Scand J Immunol. 2012 Jul;76(1):49-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02702.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22486843 (View on PubMed)

Birnbaum Y, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Ischemic preconditioning at a distance: reduction of myocardial infarct size by partial reduction of blood supply combined with rapid stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in the rabbit. Circulation. 1997 Sep 2;96(5):1641-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1641.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9315559 (View on PubMed)

Leung CH, Caldarone CA, Wang F, Venkateswaran S, Ailenberg M, Vadasz B, Wen XY, Rotstein OD. Remote Ischemic Conditioning Prevents Lung and Liver Injury After Hemorrhagic Shock/Resuscitation: Potential Role of a Humoral Plasma Factor. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1215-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000877.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25185480 (View on PubMed)

Konstantinov IE, Arab S, Kharbanda RK, Li J, Cheung MM, Cherepanov V, Downey GP, Liu PP, Cukerman E, Coles JG, Redington AN. The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans. Physiol Genomics. 2004 Sep 16;19(1):143-50. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00046.2004. Epub 2004 Aug 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15304621 (View on PubMed)

Pang T, Zhao Y, Zhang NR, Jin SQ, Pan SQ. Transient limb ischemia alters serum protein expression in healthy volunteers: complement C3 and vitronectin may be involved in organ protection induced by remote ischemic preconditioning. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:859056. doi: 10.1155/2013/859056. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24363825 (View on PubMed)

Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc Res. 2008 Aug 1;79(3):377-86. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn114. Epub 2008 May 2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18456674 (View on PubMed)

Ali ZA, Callaghan CJ, Lim E, Ali AA, Nouraei SA, Akthar AM, Boyle JR, Varty K, Kharbanda RK, Dutka DP, Gaunt ME. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I98-105. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.679167.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17846333 (View on PubMed)

Meng R, Asmaro K, Meng L, Liu Y, Ma C, Xi C, Li G, Ren C, Luo Y, Ling F, Jia J, Hua Y, Wang X, Ding Y, Lo EH, Ji X. Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1853-61. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f76a. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23035060 (View on PubMed)

Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Martens S, Zahn PK, Wolf B, Goebel U, Schwer CI, Rosenberger P, Haeberle H, Gorlich D, Kellum JA, Meersch M; RenalRIPC Investigators. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2133-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4189.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26024502 (View on PubMed)

Meybohm P, Bein B, Brosteanu O, Cremer J, Gruenewald M, Stoppe C, Coburn M, Schaelte G, Boning A, Niemann B, Roesner J, Kletzin F, Strouhal U, Reyher C, Laufenberg-Feldmann R, Ferner M, Brandes IF, Bauer M, Stehr SN, Kortgen A, Wittmann M, Baumgarten G, Meyer-Treschan T, Kienbaum P, Heringlake M, Schon J, Sander M, Treskatsch S, Smul T, Wolwender E, Schilling T, Fuernau G, Hasenclever D, Zacharowski K; RIPHeart Study Collaborators. A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1397-407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413579. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26436208 (View on PubMed)

Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, Ariti C, Jenkins DP, Kolvekar S, Knight R, Kunst G, Laing C, Nicholas J, Pepper J, Robertson S, Xenou M, Clayton T, Yellon DM; ERICCA Trial Investigators. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1408-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413534. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26436207 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez NR, Hamilton R, Bilgin-Freiert A, Dusick J, Vespa P, Hu X, Asgari S. Cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;115:193-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1192-5_36.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22890668 (View on PubMed)

Li S, Ma C, Shao G, Esmail F, Hua Y, Jia L, Qin J, Ren C, Luo Y, Ding Y, Borlongan CV, Ji X. Safety and Feasibility of Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients With Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis and Healthy Volunteers. Cell Transplant. 2015;24(9):1901-11. doi: 10.3727/096368914X683520. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25198862 (View on PubMed)

Bilgin-Freiert A, Dusick JR, Stein NR, Etchepare M, Vespa P, Gonzalez NR. Muscle microdialysis to confirm sublethal ischemia in the induction of remote ischemic preconditioning. Transl Stroke Res. 2012 Jun;3(2):266-72. doi: 10.1007/s12975-012-0153-1. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24323782 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Pro20160001420

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id