Restricted Fluid Regimen in Open Abdominal Bowel Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00456703

Last Updated: 2017-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Liberal intravenous fluid resuscitation during open abdominal surgery may predispose the patients to multiorgan dysfunction, prolong hospital stay and increase postoperative morbidity. The main aim of the study is to assess the safety and feasibility of restricted fluid regimen in open abdominal bowel surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, prospective controlled trial in patients (ASA I-III) undergoing open abdominal surgical procedures in a single center. This study will be done in two phases. The first phase is designed to evaluate and prove the safety of restricted fluid regimens in maintaining tissue perfusion using a central venous oximetric catheter and arterial blood gas analysis. In the second phase of the study, we plan to mimic the usual clinical practice without the central venous oximetric catheter and arterial lines (invasive monitors) and the postoperative total morbidity will be compared between the liberal and restricted fluid regimens.

In the first phase of the study, 90 patients coming in for open bowel surgery will be randomized to three groups using a random number generator. All patients will receive a standard bowel prep regimen (Go-Lyte-half a liter the night before surgery). Group A will receive current standard of care (liberal fluid therapy), Group B and C will receive restricted fluid regimens. All patients will receive 500 cc of intravenous fluids (lactated ringers in Group A and B, 6% hetastarch in Group C) in the preoperative holding area to correct preoperative fluid deficits due to fasting and bowel preparation. Patients younger than 18 years, ASA IV or V, pregnant patients, those with coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, unstable angina, unstable congestive heart failure, and those with contraindication to central venous pressure catheter insertion will be excluded from the study.

After instituting anesthesia monitors, patients will be anesthetized with a standard anesthetic regimen. An arterial line and a central venous catheter with oximetric capability will be inserted in all three groups. A baseline blood gas will be drawn to note the base excess, lactate levels and the hematocrit at the start of surgery. Parameters like heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation and arterial oxygen saturation and urine output will be continuously monitored. Both the regimens will be started in the operating room and continued into the postoperative period until they resume their oral intake. Patients in the liberal group will receive (10ml/kg/hr) the current standard of care for bowel surgery whereas those in the restricted group will receive 4ml/kg/hour. Post induction hemodynamic instability will be treated with ephedrine and phenylephrine at the discretion of the anesthesiologist in charge.

Intraoperative treatment of tachycardia, hypotension in both the groups will be treated using a standard fluid regimen algorithm (appendix A). All patients will receive the same postoperative fluid regimens as the current standard of care. Postoperative morbidity evaluation (appendix B) will be done at patient's discharge from the hospital. The data entry will be prospectively done during their hospital stay. The accuracy of the data will be checked by one of the study investigators.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bowel Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

restriction

In this group, the fluids will be restricted compared to a standard procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intraoperative fluid management

Intervention Type OTHER

fluid restriction

fluid restriction

Intervention Type OTHER

restriction of fluids

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intraoperative fluid management

fluid restriction

Intervention Type OTHER

fluid restriction

restriction of fluids

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA physical status I-III patients coming in for open abdominal bowel surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Coagulopathy,
* Pregnancy,
* Renal insufficiency,
* Contraindications for placing a central line,
* ASA IV and V,
* Age less than 18years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Balachundhar Subramaniam

Associate Professor of Anaesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Balachundhar Subramaniam, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15983453 (View on PubMed)

Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11794169 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006P000144

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.