Use of a Visual Pedagogy and Structure With Children With Autism for Routine Physical Exams

NCT ID: NCT03232775

Last Updated: 2017-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) have unique social-communication and behavior impairments that complicate their medical management. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using a picture schedule paired with a reinforcement system during the medical exam. Two groups (treatment and control) of children (ages 5 - 10 yrs) diagnosed with ASD and below average adaptive communication impairment were asked to participate. Following participation in an overview of autism diagnostic symptoms training, two teams (comprised of one chief medical resident and one nurse), blind to the study aim, conducted the study exams.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the effects of a picture-schedule reinforcement system on reducing problem behaviors in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) during a physical exam.

Design, setting, patients, intervention: Fifteen study participants, aged 5-10 years, with autism and identified by caregivers as typically uncooperative with physical exams were randomized to one of two physical exam groups (treatment and control) based on their adaptive communication score. The treatment group exam included use of a picture schedule-reinforcement book and the control group exam did not introduce the book. Caregivers rated participants' irritability/stereotypy behaviors before and during study exams. Exam teams blinded to study aims, recorded participants' total exam items completed and caregivers rated participants' level of cooperation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers
The medical examination teams (one chief medical resident and one nurse) will be blind to the study aim.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

Treatment: Physical Exam with Visual Pedagogy and Structure

Group Type OTHER

Treatment: Physical Exam with Visual Pedagogy and Structure

Intervention Type OTHER

Routine physical examination participants receive visual pedagogy and reinforcement (preferred food treat).

Control

Control: Physical Exam without Visual Pedagogy and Structure

Group Type OTHER

Control: Physical Exam without Visual Pedagogy and Structure

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants engage in routine physical examination without visual pedagogy and reinforcement (preferred food treat).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment: Physical Exam with Visual Pedagogy and Structure

Routine physical examination participants receive visual pedagogy and reinforcement (preferred food treat).

Intervention Type OTHER

Control: Physical Exam without Visual Pedagogy and Structure

Participants engage in routine physical examination without visual pedagogy and reinforcement (preferred food treat).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Chronological ages 4 to 10 years.
2. Presumptive diagnosis of Autistic Disorder or Asperger's Disorder prior to study admission from a psychologist or psychiatrist experienced with children who have autism.
3. Meets research criteria for Autistic Spectrum Disorder:

1. Meets cut-off scores for autism spectrum on the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) (cut-off = 15) and
2. Meets empirically-derived algorithm cut-off scores for Autism Spectrum Disorders on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS).
3. All subjects will have the ADOS administered by a clinician trained in research reliability standards.
4. The Principal Investigator, a certified ADOS trainer and research reliable, or trained designee under the supervision of the Principal Investigator, will administer the ADOS.
4. Participants will represent the typical DSM-IV diagnostic developmental profile of children on the autism spectrum and no neurological injuries or illnesses before the age of three years that could account for their symptoms (i.e., meningitis, encephalitis, severe head injury or seizure disorder).
5. A Communication standard score ≤ 85, as measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales - II.

a) The VABS-II will be administered by the Principal Investigator or trained designee under the supervision of the Principal Investigator as part of the initial phone screening process.
6. Children with an ASD, particularly school-aged children and adolescents, may present with myriad prescribed psychotropic medications. Therefore, we will not exclude children on a variety of psychotropic medications; rather we will conduct a qualitative analysis to look at this issue.
7. No restrictions regarding race or gender will be applied to the autism or developmental disability sample. Every effort will be made not to over-represent any particular race and/or gender group.
8. Physically healthy prior to physical exam.
9. Previous exposure to visual systems. This will be assessed based on caregiver report during the phone screening using one question relating to the use of visual structure with the child.
10. History of:

1. Poor Cooperation
2. Completely Uncooperative
3. Physical exams rated by caregiver on 4-point scale of cooperation modified from Forsberg et al. \[56\].

* 0 = No problems with cooperation;
* 1 = Minor problems with cooperation: Child shows mild behavior problems and/or anxiety symptoms;
* 2 = Poor cooperation: Child's behavior problems and/or anxiety symptoms requires that the medical staff have to spend extra time and effort to manage the child and complete the exam;
* 3 = Completely uncooperative: Exam is not possible due to child's behavior problems and/or anxiety symptoms

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participants with intelligence quotient standard scores \> 40.
2. Presence of the following genetic or progressive neurological disorders known to be causative of or potentially resulting in a phenotype similar to autism:

1. Fragile X,
2. Landau Kleffner, Rett Disorder,
3. Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, or
4. Tuberous Sclerosis, based on screening by clinical staff and subsequent review by medical staff as needed
3. Presence of vision or hearing loss or significant motor impairments.
4. Wards of the State.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital Colorado

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robin Gabriels, PsyD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07-0362

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing Study
NCT02464527 COMPLETED NA
Building Complex Language
NCT01337232 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Strategies for Teaching Verbs
NCT03441685 COMPLETED NA