Estimation of CPR Chest Compression Depth

NCT ID: NCT03230461

Last Updated: 2017-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Optimal chest compression depth during CPR is 4.56cm which is at variance with the current guidelines of 5.0-6.0cm. A change in guidelines is only worthwhile if healthcare professionals can accurately judge a subtle reduction in chest compression depth during CPR by a relatively small amount.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chest compression depth and rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are important predictors of return of spontaneous circulation and survival following cardiac arrest. Stiell et al (2014) found optimal survival at a compression depth of 4.56cm, which is at variance with the current guidelines of 5.0-6.0cm. A change in guidelines is only likely to improve survival rates if healthcare professionals can accurately implement these subtle depth modifications into the basic life support (BLS) algorithm. This study aims to determine if healthcare professionals can accurately judge compression depth without real-time feedback.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Prospective, randomised.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Participants and researchers are blinded to the actual depth achieved during each CPR run.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Target compression depth 4.0-5.0 cm

The rescuer is asked to perform two minutes of chest compressions on a manikin, aiming to compress to the target depth at a rate of 100-120/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Compression depth

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Target compression depth 4.5-5.5 cm

The rescuer is asked to perform two minutes of chest compressions on a manikin, aiming to compress to the target depth at a rate of 100-120/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Compression depth

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Target compression depth 5.0-6.0 cm

The rescuer is asked to perform two minutes of chest compressions on a manikin, aiming to compress to the target depth at a rate of 100-120/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Compression depth

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Compression depth

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* NHS professionals (staff or students), who have successfully completed a hospital-accredited basic life support (BLS) course, including a practical CPR component.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, significant medical illness or injury that would impair delivery of chest compressions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southampton

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charles Deakin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Southampton

Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19575

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effectiveness of CPR Pillow
NCT07160881 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA