EFFECTS OF SHOCK WAVE THERAPY IN WOMEN WITH PAIN IN TRAPÉZIO MUSCLE

NCT ID: NCT03222154

Last Updated: 2017-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-01

Study Completion Date

2016-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study consisted of 60 women who had pain-point pains in the upper fibers of the trapezius muscle. They had a medical age of 22.8 years, with a body mass index of 22.8 kg / cm2.They underwent an initial assessment, with a visual analogue pain scale, followed by an assessment of pain threshold, and manual muscle strength.Then, they were allocated into three groups: control group with 20 volunteers without intervention, placebo group with 20 volunteers with shock wave simulation and an intervention group with 20 volunteers with shock wave therapy.

All volunteers were evaluated immediately after the protocol (post evaluation) and 48 hours after the intervention protocol (48 hour evaluation). A mixed ANOVA of repeated measurements was used for intra and intergroup comparisons, followed by tukey post hoc. Significance was set at 5% (p \<0.05).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective was to investigate the effects of shock wave therapy on the pain of trigger points in the upper fibers of the trapezius muscle.

A randomized, blinded clinical trial of 60 women (mean age 22.8 years and mean body mass index of 22.8 kg / cm2) with presence of trigger points in the upper fibers of the trapezius muscle. These were submitted to an initial evaluation (AV1), composed of the visual analogical pain scale, followed by an evaluation of the pain threshold, using algometry.

Then, the evaluation of the electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius muscle was performed, as well as of its muscular strength by manual dynamometry. Then allocated randomly in 3 groups: Control (n = 20), without intervention; Placebo (n = 20), simulation of the application of shock wave therapy; And shock wave therapy (n = 20).

Shock wave therapy was performed with the Master Plus 200® Storz Medical equipment, radial emission 2000 pulses, 15 Hz frequency and pressure of 1 Bar. All volunteers were evaluated immediately after the protocol (post evaluation) and 48 hours After the intervention protocol (evaluation 48 hours). A mixed ANOVA of repeated measurements was used for intra and intergroup comparisons, followed by tukey post hoc. Significance was set at 5% (p \<0.05).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Muscle Tonus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

3 groups: Control (n = 20), without intervention; Placebo (n = 20), simulation of the application of shock wave therapy; And shock wave therapy (n = 20).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

20 volunteers without intervention. At the end of the study they received an application of shock wave therapy.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Placebo

20 volunteers who received simulation of the application of shock wave therapy

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo - Shock wave therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Simulation of shock wave therapy

Experimental

20 volunteers who received shock wave therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental - Shock wave therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Shock wave therapy was performed with the Master Plus 200® Storz Medical equipment, radial emission 2000 pulses, frequency 15 Hz and pressure 1 Bar.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental - Shock wave therapy

Shock wave therapy was performed with the Master Plus 200® Storz Medical equipment, radial emission 2000 pulses, frequency 15 Hz and pressure 1 Bar.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo - Shock wave therapy

Simulation of shock wave therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

High energy shock wave therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with painful symptoms, compatible with the referred pain pattern of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle.
* Age range of 18 to 35 years.
* No upper limb injury in the last 6 months.
* Featuring trigger points identified in the upper trapezius muscle.
* Present pain and / or moderate and / or severe disability after application of specific instruments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Present unbearable pain during the evaluation procedures.
* Missing or not executing the solution correctly.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da Silva

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da Silva

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UFRN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.