Clinical Outcome in Patients With Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas (COPSDAVF)
NCT ID: NCT03192800
Last Updated: 2021-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-03-01
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Registry for Degenerative Spinal Disease (RDSD)
NCT05332249
Tractography and Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Human Spinal Cord in Healthy Subjects : Anatomical Atlas
NCT05079945
Posterior Fossa Decompression With or Without Duraplasty for Chiari Type I Malformation With Syringomyelia
NCT02669836
Real World Data Collection and Analysis on the Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT05602714
Strategic Use of Big Data in Spine Surgery - Testing Digital Prediction of Outcome in Clinical Praxis
NCT05817747
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, it is difficult to predict whose symptoms will improve and whose will stabilize or deteriorate. Due to the low incidence of the SDAVFs, nearly all studies which have been published about the clinical outcome and prognostic factors of SDAVFs are relatively limited and most of them are retrospective. In these studies, the preoperative severity of disability, age, gender, location of fistula and duration of symptoms have been analyzed as prognostic factors, therefore it remains unclear which are the most reliable predictor of clinical outcome. Moreover, the conclusions may be biased by long span of follow-up period or few clinical cases. Besides, the fitulas at the craniocervical junction often present with hemorrhage, while those below conus constitute 3 types of lesions. So the invsetigator conduct this prospective cohort study to clarify the 1-year outcome of patients with cervical and thoracolumbar SDAVFs and to determine the main prognostic factors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the fiatula locate between C2 and L5
* patient not received surgical or interventional treatment before
* patient with normal cardiac, renal and hepatic function
* patient capable of understanding the content of the patient information / Informed Consent Form
* patient willing and able to participate in the registry
Exclusion Criteria
* patient is pregnant patient allergic to iodine
* patient unable to complete follow-up
* patient with cerebral lesions patient with other spinal lesions
* patient with cardiac, renal or hepatic dysfunction
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Haidian Hospital
OTHER
Hongqi Zhang, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hongqi Zhang, MD
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zhang Hongqi, MD.PHD.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neurosurgery Department of Xuanwu hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cenzato M, Versari P, Righi C, Simionato F, Casali C, Giovanelli M. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: analysis of outcome in relation to pretreatment indicators. Neurosurgery. 2004 Oct;55(4):815-22; discussion 822-3. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000137630.50959.a7.
Steinmetz MP, Chow MM, Krishnaney AA, Andrews-Hinders D, Benzel EC, Masaryk TJ, Mayberg MR, Rasmussen PA. Outcome after the treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: a contemporary single-institution series and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jul;55(1):77-87; discussion 87-8. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000126878.95006.0f.
Fugate JE, Lanzino G, Rabinstein AA. Clinical presentation and prognostic factors of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: an overview. Neurosurg Focus. 2012 May;32(5):E17. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS11376.
Sherif C, Gruber A, Bavinzski G, Standhardt H, Widhalm G, Gibson D, Richling B, Knosp E. Long-term outcome of a multidisciplinary concept of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae treatment. Neuroradiology. 2008 Jan;50(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0303-4. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
Saladino A, Atkinson JL, Rabinstein AA, Piepgras DG, Marsh WR, Krauss WE, Kaufmann TJ, Lanzino G. Surgical treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: a consecutive series of 154 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010 Nov;67(5):1350-7; discussion 1357-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ef2821.
Krings T, Geibprasert S. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Apr;30(4):639-48. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1485. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COPSDAVF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.