Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-12-12
2017-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will investigate the association of this potential stress to patient experienced stress and patient related outcomes of the lumbar puncture procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cervical Plexus Hydrodissection With D5W for PTSD
NCT04421573
The Value of Short-term Pain Relief for the Prediction of Long-term Outcome After Cervical or Lumbar Nerve Root Infiltration
NCT01945554
A Prospective Study of a Modified Lumbar Puncture (LP) Procedure That Reduces Post-Lumbar Puncture Headaches (PLPH) in Patients
NCT06062446
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transforaminal Epidural Injections in Lumbar Disc Herniation or Radiculitis
NCT01052571
Headache After Diagnostic Lumbar Puncture
NCT03960749
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress (CATS), the stress sensation arises when the requirements exceed the resources for a given task. For the LP procedure, a stress sensation among novice residents might arise due to the combination of the LP being a complex procedure depending on both technical as non-technical aspects combined with residents uncertainties for procedural performance and a fear of doing harm.
Despite a growing recognition of stress among residents, the acute mental stress of residents performing invasive procedures has been unacknowledged. Within neurology, internal medicine, and emergency medicine a particular subject for this stress might pertain to residents' first performance of the lumbar puncture.
However, for non-surgical invasive procedures as the LP, there is a lack of evidence for measurements of AMS across experience levels and how this potential stress might influence the performance and patient related outcomes.
Hence, the aim of this study is to explore stress levels across lumbar puncture experience levels and how this potential stress might affect procedural performance and the patients' experience of stress and outcomes of the procedure. Additionally, the study will explore a potential correlation between patient stress and the risk of developing post-dural puncture headache.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Expert
The physicians in the Expert-group will perform a LP following local standard procedure protocol.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intermediate
The physicians in the Intermediate-group will perform a LP following local standard procedure protocol.
No interventions assigned to this group
Novice
The physicians in the novice-group will perform a LP following local standard procedure protocol.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Speaking Danish fluently
* Understanding and accepting study implications
* For novice group only: Medical student having clinical rotation at the study sites
* Referred to the outpatient clinic for a LP;
* Glasgow Coma Scale 15;
* Proficiency in the Danish Language;
* Age between 18 and 80 years;
* Understanding and accepting study implications
* Able to co-operate to the procedure without a need for personal assistance;
* Providing written and orally informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
For expert group physicians: Consultant (or other senior physician position); LP experience \> 100 procedures; supervisor for novice performer; Performing LP on a regular basis.
For intermediate group physicians:
Performing LP on a regular basis; LP experience of 10-80 procedures.
For novice group physicians:
No previous lumbar puncture experience
For patients enrolled in the study:
* Lumbar puncture intended on suspicion of Alzheimer or another dementia diagnosis;
* Cognitive impairment, assessed by the study investigator or local nurse/doctor; -
* Physical disabilities, requiring personal assistance.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region Zealand
OTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen
Principal Investigator, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Konge, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
CAMES - Rigshospitalet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup
Glostrup Municipality, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Department of Neuology, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zealand
Roskilde, Region Sjælland, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AMSLP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.