Intra-operatory Neurophysiological Monitoring Changes as a Predictive Clinical Outcome Measure in Lumbar Radiculopathy.

NCT ID: NCT02185508

Last Updated: 2014-07-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the relation among: (1) changes in voltage and amplitude of trans-operatory records obtained through the use of Intra-operative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM), and (2) clinical outcomes; of patients who underwent 1 or 2 levels surgical decompression at lumbar spine.

IONM is the use of real time neurophysiological techniques during spinal surgeries. The modalities included in this study are:

* Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs).
* Trans-cranial electric motor evoked potentials (tceMEPs).
* Spontaneous electromyography (EMG).

Clinical outcome of the patients will be assessed through a careful evaluation of clinical data, as well as the application of three outcome scales:

* Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a
* Visual Analogue Scale for Pain
* Patient's Overall Impression of Change

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Radiculopathy associated to lumbar disk disease is one of the most common reasons for a spine surgeon to be consulted. The pathophysiology of degenerative spine disease is acknowledged as complex, involving a wide array of risk factors ranging from genetic polymorphisms, to behavioural characteristics. While conflicting opinions exist with regard the direction of treatment for lumbar disk disease, de-compressive surgery is currently the gold standard for patients in which protocols of physiotherapy and analgesics have failed to comply.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is widely used in the practice of spine surgery as a mean of preventing and reducing severe complications inherent to surgical techniques like paraparesis, paraplegia and quadriplegia. Indeed, a great deal of funding and work have been devoted to research projects seeking to determine the impact of IONM in reducing these risks. The results of such projects have been notoriously interesting, and frequently opposing to each other. This has lead to an open debate on weather the use of IONM may or not be justified by better outcomes in patients who undergo such procedure. To our knowledge there is no study in the literature that has addressed the potential role of the IOM to predict the long-term outcome of the patient in therms of radicular symptoms improvement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Disc Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lumbar spine surgery with IONM

Patients diagnosed with 1 or 2 level lumbar disk disease and radicular symptoms who underwent decompressive surgery, and for whom IONM records exist.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of Lumbar Disk Disease
* Clinical Signs of Radiculopathy
* Undergoing neurological surgery of the spine

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous neurological surgery of the lumbar spine
* More than 2 levels intervened at the surgery
* Serious post-operatory complications
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American British Cowdray Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Galvan Ernesto Eduardo

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roberto De Leo Vargas, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Maximino Tellez, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Ildefonso Muñoz Romero, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Miguel Angel Collado Corona, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Leopoldo Torres Vyera, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Christian Cerecedo, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Eduardo Galvan Hernandez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

American British Cowdray Medical Center

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Koerner JD, Glaser J, Radcliff K. Which Variables Are Associated With Patient-reported Outcomes After Discectomy? Review of SPORT Disc Herniation Studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2000-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3671-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24818737 (View on PubMed)

Sabnis AB, Diwan AD. The timing of surgery in lumbar disc prolapse: A systematic review. Indian J Orthop. 2014 Mar;48(2):127-35. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.128740.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24741132 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/spanish/ency/article/000442.htm

Para mas informacion sobre hernias de disco, porfavor visite la siguiente pagina de internet:

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000442.htm

For more information on disk hernias, please visit the following web page:

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ABC-14-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.