Bilateral Lumbar Decompression Via Uniportal Endoscopic Laminotomy in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Multicentric Case Series
NCT ID: NCT07045714
Last Updated: 2025-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
78 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-31
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study evaluates a minimally invasive surgical approach called unilateral laminotomy with bilateral lumbar decompression (ULBLD) using endoscopic uniportal technique as an alternative to traditional methods for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The main objective is to assess changes in neurological deficits and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following this procedure. The study will also document hospitalization duration, surgical time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications.
This multicenter, prospective case series will recruit 78 patients from three medical centers in Mexico. Participants must have symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis that persists despite at least three months of conservative treatment. Eligible patients will undergo ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique, a method that allows precise nerve decompression through a small incision, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. Standardized clinical assessment tools, including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale for lumbar disease, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, will be used to evaluate outcomes at multiple time points over 12 months.
By comparing patients' preoperative and postoperative evaluations, the study aims to determine whether ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique effectively improves neurological function and reduces disability while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Findings from this study could lead to a more precise understanding of the impact of ULBLD on disability, pain, and health-related quality of life for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT03388307
Comparative Outcomes of Conventional TLIF With Posterior Decompression Surgery Versus Endoscopic Foraminotomy Surgery
NCT06685575
Clinical Outcome Study of Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT00737607
Is it Really Necessary Going All Over the Top in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
NCT07026305
Assessment of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Technique Applied to Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Pathologies
NCT06448416
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study investigates the use of ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique, a minimally invasive surgical approach that offers targeted decompression through a single small incision while minimizing tissue disruption. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate changes in neurological deficits and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following this procedure. Secondary objectives include assessing the duration of hospitalization, surgical time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications.
This multicenter, prospective case series will recruit 78 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis at three medical institutions in Mexico. The study will be conducted over a period of 24 months, with an initial 12-month patient recruitment phase, followed by postoperative follow-up assessments at predetermined time intervals up to one year. Participants will undergo ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique, a method designed to preserve spinal mobility while reducing compression on the nerve roots. The procedure will be performed under general anesthesia with continuous neurophysiological monitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, and continuous electromyography. Using a working-channel endoscope, surgeons will perform laminotomies to remove compressive elements such as osteophytes, hypertrophic ligaments, or herniated disc material. The technique is aimed at achieving decompression with minimal disruption to the surrounding soft tissues.
Patients must meet specific inclusion criteria, including an age range of 18 to 75 years, confirmed diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (Lee classification grade I-III), and the presence of neurological symptoms unresponsive to at least three months of conservative management. Exclusion criteria include prior lumbar surgery at the affected level, active infections, systemic inflammatory diseases, vertebral instability, congenital spinal malformations, and contraindications for general anesthesia.
Patient outcomes will be systematically evaluated using validated clinical assessment tools, including:
* Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Scale for lumbar disease to assess neurological function and functional status.
* Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to measure the impact of lumbar pain on daily activities.
* Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain to quantify lumbar and lower limb pain intensity.
* EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire to evaluate overall well-being.
* Modified MacNab Criteria to determine patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes.
Descriptive statistical methods will be used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated using paired ttests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. The impact of the procedure on neurological function and pain relief will be assessed through longitudinal comparisons between baseline and follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The incidence of complications will be categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the Comprehensive Complication Index will be used to quantify cumulative morbidity.
This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines, and national regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrollment, and patient confidentiality will be maintained through data pseudonymization. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of the participating institutions.
The expected impact of this study is to generate clinical evidence supporting ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique as a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Cases
Patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis who exhibit persistent neurological deficits and pain despite receiving at least three months of conservative treatment. All participants have elected to undergo ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique. They are being prospectively followed to evaluate improvements in neurological function and reductions in pain-related disability, as well as to document perioperative outcomes including surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications.
Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Lumbar Decompression (ULBLD)
Unilateral laminotomy with bilateral lumbar decompression (ULBLD) using endoscopic uniportal technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Lumbar Decompression (ULBLD)
Unilateral laminotomy with bilateral lumbar decompression (ULBLD) using endoscopic uniportal technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years and \<75 years.
* Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis grade I-III according to the Lee scale.
* Radicular or myelopathic symptoms.
* Having undergone complete conservative management, including physical therapy and analgesia, for at least 3 months.
* Patients who have opted for ULBLD using endoscopic uniportal technique for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior lumbar surgeries at the levels to be treated.
* Infectious symptoms or concomitant rheumatologic diseases.
* Criteria of lumbar vertebral instability.
* Congenital spinal malformations.
* Disc herniation at the same lumbar level to be operated on.
* Medullary hyperintensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the levels to be treated.
18 Years
74 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tecnologico de Monterrey
OTHER
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI IMSS
OTHER
Hospital Ángeles Tijuana
UNKNOWN
Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Mexico
UNKNOWN
TecSalud
UNKNOWN
TecSalud Investigación Clínica
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mario Benvenutti Regato, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TecSalud
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Zambrano Hellion, TecSalud
San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MELD-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.