Assessment of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Technique Applied to Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Pathologies
NCT ID: NCT06448416
Last Updated: 2024-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-01
2024-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
With surgical techniques evolution, minimally invasive spine surgery has emerged in recent decades as an alternative to conventional open surgery and is widely used for HDL treatment. Several minimally invasive surgical endoscopic techniques have been developed for disc herniation: Single Portal Endoscopy (SE), Video Assisted Endoscopic Discectomy, and recently Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE).
Currently, SE is considered as the minimally invasive surgery gold standard for HDL but, over the past two years, UBE for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases has increased exponentially with faster learning curve than other endoscopic techniques.
As an emerging technique, further studies are needed to better understand UBE. This is why Dr. Cristini's team wish to analyze a cohort of patients for whom this technique has been used since July 2022, in particular the complication rate.
Controlling a new technique requires a learning phase. This is why Dr. Cristini's team also wishes to describe the learning curve on the cohort of patients for whom UBE was used since July 2022.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biportal Endoscopy Spine Surgery (BESS )Versus Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression (ULBD ): RCT, Non-inferiority Trial
NCT03302507
Ambulatory Geriatric Endoscopic Spine
NCT06523426
Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy: RCT, Non-inferiority Trial
NCT03924700
Percutaneous Discectomy to Treat Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation : Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency, Patient Reported Outcomes and Economical Impact by Assessing Time Before Return to Work and Duration of Hospitalization Stay
NCT05772143
Endoscopic Decompression Versus Microscopic Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT06381167
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With surgical techniques evolution, minimally invasive spine surgery has emerged in recent decades as an alternative to conventional open surgery and is widely used for HDL treatment. Compared to traditional open surgery, minimally invasive surgical technique offers muscle and bone sparing, pain reduction and faster recovery, allowing patient management in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (RAAC).
Several minimally invasive surgical endoscopic techniques have been developed for disc herniation: Single Portal Endoscopy (SE), Video Assisted Endoscopic Discectomy, and recently Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE). SE relies on a single entry route whereas UBE is based on two entry routes : one way for optical instruments and saline irrigation system and one way for surgical instruments. Currently, SE is considered as the minimally invasive surgery gold standard for HDL treatment thanks to its advantages for controlling muscles trauma, reducing hospital stay and maintaining spinal segment stability.
Over the past two years, UBE for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases has increased exponentially with faster learning curve than other endoscopic techniques.
UBE allows a wider field of vision, wide and ergonomic operating gestures, is minimally invasive and contributes to complete nervous decompression and faster recovery. With UBE, the surgeon can use one hand to guide endoscope and he other one to guide surgical instruments . In addition, UBE generates less trauma, less bleeding, rapid recovery and good effectiveness in HDL treatment . UBE can significantly reduce postoperative nerve fibrosis, and postoperative spinal instability incidence.
During UBE, some postoperative complications have been described as poor treatment effectiveness (nucleus pulposus nucleus residue), epidural hematoma, dural tear, nerve root injury and incomplete surgery.
As an emerging technique, further studies are needed to better understand UBE. This is why Dr. Cristini's team wish to analyze a cohort of patients for whom this technique has been used since July 2022, in particular the complication rate.
Controlling a new technique requires a learning phase. Chen, L et al. showed that the operation duration and the postoperative hospitalization duration, were reduced from the 24th patient until the 97th patient out of a cohort of 97 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by UBE. However, there was no significant difference in the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) in all operated patients. This indicates that UBE still guarantees clinical effect and safety on all operated patients. This is why Dr. Cristini's team also wishes to describe the learning curve on the cohort of patients for whom UBE was used since July 2022.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) Technique
Patient with LDH treated by UBE
UBE
Patients with HDL were treated with UBE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
UBE
Patients with HDL were treated with UBE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with lumbar disc herniation or non-instrumented degenerative lumbar pathology
* Patient operated with UBE technique
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient suffering from other serious illnesses
* Patient with lumbar instability, lumbar infection or lumbar tumor,
* Patient with multi-segmental lumbar disease requiring treatment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital CLAIRVAL
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RGDS-2023-12-014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.