Use of Lumbar Motion Monitor to Predict Response to Radiofrequency Ablation After Medial Branch Diagnostic Blocks

NCT ID: NCT03894319

Last Updated: 2023-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-06

Study Completion Date

2021-02-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is being performed to determine if adding an objective measurement of back function can assess the success of a commonly performed back injection procedure-lumbar medial branch blocks. Researchers also hope to compare whether those who have objective improvements after lumbar medial branch blocks will also have more successful lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The current standard of care to determine the success of lumbar medical branch block(s) (MBB) is highly subjective, even if clinicians were to use validated questionairres. Currently, there are no studies that use a validated objective functional outcome measure to practically and efficiently assess lumbar MBB success prior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The addition of a validated objective measure of functional impairment to the current standard of care may help us improve in identifying the patients that will benefit from lumbar RFA. It has the potential to minimize procedures of limited benefit with a significant impact on containing healthcare spending. Additionally, it may further knowledge on how to appropriately select patients without relying on the stringent double block diagnostic technique put forth by the CMS that may exclude patients who could greatly benefit from a lumbar RFA.

As the objective measure the study will use a lumber motion monitor (LMM). The LMM weighs less than 5 pounds and fits on with a shoulder harness and belt. The LMM measures motion in all three directions (forward back, side to side, and twisting) just like the spine. The LMM testing may take up to 30 minutes depending on how many tasks can be performed by the participant and how many practice trials are required. The LMM testing includes bending forward and back to upright as fast as possible; comfortably while maintaining a twist position.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female, 20 years of age to 70 years of age
* Capable and willing to consent
* Participants literate in English language
* Patients with predominately bilateral axial pain and clinical suspicion of lumbar facet pain.
* Patients who have completed conservative care: physical therapy (PT)

Exclusion Criteria

* History of drug abuse/ dependency
* History of prior lumbar medial branch block or medial branch radiofrequency ablation
* Changes to analgesic regimen in the last 30 days
* Allergy to lidocaine or bupivacaine local anesthetic
* Illiteracy (English)
* Presence of a clinically diagnosed major psychiatric condition such as bipolar disorder, uncontrolled major depression, schizophrenia
* Predominately radicular pain.
* Patient reported limb pain greater than axial low back pain
* Previous lumbar spine surgery
* Any condition that the principle investigator may disqualify the patient
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

JayeshVallabh

Assistant Professor- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jayesh Vallabh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018H0197

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.