Grasping Rehabilitation Using Motor Imagery With or With no Neurofeedback After Tetraplegia

NCT ID: NCT03190863

Last Updated: 2023-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-29

Study Completion Date

2025-05-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Motor imagery has shown promising results to optimize tenodesis grasp in individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia. However, efficacy of using motor imagery to improve grasping after tetraplegia requires further study with higher level of evidence. In addition, controlling covert practice remains difficult due to the absence of overt movements. However, similar brain activity measured during both over and cover movements makes possible to provide visual information about the covert practice performance using neurofeedback.

The Investigators thus designed this multicentric randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of motor imagery with or with no visual neurofeedback on grasping capabilities after C6-C7 tetraplegia. They hypothesized that providing neurofeedback based on brain activity measured by electroencephalography namely knowing the covert practice performance would results in greater grasping improvement in response to practice as compared to motor imagery practice alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Individuals With C6-C7 Tetraplegia (AIS A or B)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Motor imagery combined with neurofeedback (MINF)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Motor imagery combined with neurofeedback (MINF)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

7 individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia randomize in the experimental group consisting in motor imagery practice combined with visual neurofeedback (NF - i.e. performance of the imagined movement).

Intervention consists in a total of 15 sessions repeated 3 times a week and lasting 5 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes. An experienced physical therapist supervised all sessions. After each imagined movement, the NF based on brain activity measured by electroencephalography is display on a screen.

Motor imagery (MI)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motor imagery (MI)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

7 individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia randomized in the active comparator group consisting in motor imagery practice alone without visual NF. This means that the performance of the imagined movement is not displayed to the participants.

Intervention consists in a total of 15 sessions repeated 3 times a week and lasting 5 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes. An experienced physical therapist supervised all sessions.

Control (C)

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Control (C)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

7 individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia randomized in the sham comparator group consisting in imagining geometric shapes by visualization. Shapes are successively displayed on a screen.

Intervention consists in a total of 15 sessions repeated 3 times a week and lasting 5 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes. An experienced physical therapist supervised all sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Motor imagery combined with neurofeedback (MINF)

7 individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia randomize in the experimental group consisting in motor imagery practice combined with visual neurofeedback (NF - i.e. performance of the imagined movement).

Intervention consists in a total of 15 sessions repeated 3 times a week and lasting 5 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes. An experienced physical therapist supervised all sessions. After each imagined movement, the NF based on brain activity measured by electroencephalography is display on a screen.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motor imagery (MI)

7 individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia randomized in the active comparator group consisting in motor imagery practice alone without visual NF. This means that the performance of the imagined movement is not displayed to the participants.

Intervention consists in a total of 15 sessions repeated 3 times a week and lasting 5 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes. An experienced physical therapist supervised all sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control (C)

7 individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia randomized in the sham comparator group consisting in imagining geometric shapes by visualization. Shapes are successively displayed on a screen.

Intervention consists in a total of 15 sessions repeated 3 times a week and lasting 5 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes. An experienced physical therapist supervised all sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Volunteer individuals with C6-C7 tetraplegia with complete finger flexor paralysis restricting grasping capabilities to the tenodesis.
* Consent to participate to the study after receiving clear, loyal and appropriate information.
* Aged between 18 and 55 years.
* Time since spinal cord injury above 6 months
* Stabilized condition in particular sensori-motor deficit.
* Sitting position for more than 1 hour
* Able to imagine movement
* Health care beneficiary

Exclusion Criteria

* Long-lasting autonomic disorders while sitting (orthostatic hypotension and/or blood pressure instability) limiting sitting position to less than 1 hour.
* Upper limb pain for either mechanic or neuropathic reasons preventing all grasping movement and/or the ability to imagine those movements.
* Restricted wrist and finger range of motion preventing the tenodesis grasp.
* Patient after surgical tendon transfer that improved grasping capabilities (e.g. active finger flexion).
* Ongoing participation in another research that aim to evaluate an intervention likely to improve the neurological or functional recovery introducing an experimental bias.
* Specific contraindication to Magnetoencephalography with the presence of metallic fragments inside the body such as pace-maker, neurostimulator, cochlear implants, steel dental implant and osteosynthesis material only applicable to the participants included in Lyon hospital center (n=15).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sébastien MATEO, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Plate-forme Mouvement et Handicap, F-69000 Lyon, France.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Le Centre Mutualiste Neurologique PROPARA, Parc Euromédecine

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle

Saint-Genis-Laval, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sébastien MATEO, PhD

Role: CONTACT

478 865 066 ext. +33

Gilles RODE, PhD

Role: CONTACT

478 865 066 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Anthony GELIS, MD

Role: primary

Sébastien MATEO

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mateo S, Di Rienzo F, Reilly KT, Revol P, Delpuech C, Daligault S, Guillot A, Jacquin-Courtois S, Luaute J, Rossetti Y, Collet C, Rode G. Improvement of grasping after motor imagery in C6-C7 tetraplegia: A kinematic and MEG pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(4):543-55. doi: 10.3233/RNN-140466.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26409412 (View on PubMed)

Charbonnier G, Reilly KT, Schwartz D, Daligault S, Luaute J, Rossetti Y, Collet C, Gelis A, Rode G, Mateo S. Grasping rehabilitation using motor imagery with or without neurofeedback after tetraplegia: a study protocol for a bicentric randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 21;14(10):e074652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074652.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39433413 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

69HCL17_0016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neural Stimulation for Hand Grasp
NCT04306328 COMPLETED NA