Discussing Death and Dying: An End of Life Curriculum to Empower Residents

NCT ID: NCT03186274

Last Updated: 2019-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-26

Study Completion Date

2018-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate how the educational intervention utilized affects pediatric resident comfort level with EOL discussions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One of the most challenging roles a physician can serve is delivering life altering and/or bad news to patients and their families, and yet this skill is not widely taught to physicians. A survey from 2003 of pediatric residents found that not only was there minimal education and training in this area, but that they felt there was no natural improvement in their skills from the first to third year of training. It has also been shown that the art of eliciting a patient or family's concerns about death and responding to them is felt to be poorly taught. Worse, residents have indicated that a hidden curriculum in medicine seems to indicate that there is no value to these conversations at all. Residents are not the only stakeholders involved who have expressed concern with this reality. Parents of pediatric patients have repeatedly reported wanting increased sensitivity and clarity during sharing of life-altering information. Up to 75% of parents have reported a negative experience involving end of life (EOL) discussions, and cited inexperience, lack of comfort in communication, and a lack of knowledge as contributing factors to their negative experiences. Less than 18% of students and residents report receiving formal education in EOL discussions, despite the fact that 90% or more of residents have identified caring for those dying as part of a physician's responsibilities. Of residents who do get experience with EOL discussions, less than 2/3 receive feedback. Some residencies, such as internal medicine, have recognized the need for formal instruction on how to have EOL discussions is needed and have implemented formal programs to answer it, and it has even become a standard expectation for many fellowships. Formal education regarding EOL has also become a standard expectation for many fellowships, including pediatric neonatology, intensive care, and hematology/oncology. Despite the evidence that there is need for formal intervention and education regarding EOL care, there has been little advancement towards implementing a formal curriculum in pediatric residency programs. Review of the literature demonstrates that only one study has developed a formal curriculum involving a method called SPIKES (Setting, Perception, Involvement, Knowledge, Empathy, and Summary) that targets pediatric residents. The initial data from this study is promising and indicates increased comfort level in residents. However, to date no study has evaluated if the method of instruction affects the resident education, an important consideration as some interventions (ex. standardized patients) are more costly and time consuming than others (ex. facilitator guided small group sessions).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Education, Medical Education, Medical, Graduate Care, Palliative Medicine, Palliative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Those in the control group (CG) will write a pre and post-study reflection essay discussing their experiences with end of life discussions.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Facilitated Group Session

Participants in Facilitated Group Session (previously called Intervention Group 1) will watch a pre-recorded video describing the SPIKES model and then take part of a facilitated guided group session reviewing the model and group interview of standardized/simulated patient encounter.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Facilitated Group Session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will review the SPIKES model with a facilitator and then participate in a guided and supported simulated patient encounter utilizing aspects of the SPIKES model, with feedback at the end of the session.

CELA Session

Participants in the CELA Session (previously called Intervention Group 2) will watch a pre-recorded video describing the SPIKES model and then participate in an individualized standardized/simulated patient scenario that will be filmed at the Center for Experiential Learning and Assessment (CELA).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CELA Session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will review the SPIKES model on their own and then participate in a simulated patient encounter utilizing the SPIKES model. They will receive feedback following the encounter.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Facilitated Group Session

Participants will review the SPIKES model with a facilitator and then participate in a guided and supported simulated patient encounter utilizing aspects of the SPIKES model, with feedback at the end of the session.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

CELA Session

Participants will review the SPIKES model on their own and then participate in a simulated patient encounter utilizing the SPIKES model. They will receive feedback following the encounter.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Post Graduate Year (PGY) 2 or PGY-3 resident participating in the already-required Advocacy rotation at Monroe Carrell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
* Availability to participate in self reflection essays and simulated patient case
* English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Medical students, PGY-1, PGY-4 or PGY-5 residents, fellows or learners not participating in the already-required Advocacy rotation
* Inability to participate in self reflection essays and simulated patient case
* Non-English speaking
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katherine Schultz

Resident, Department of Pediatrics, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Travis Crook, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Pediatric Hospital Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Monroe Carell Junior Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tait GR, Hodges BD. Residents learning from a narrative experience with dying patients: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Oct;18(4):727-43. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9411-y. Epub 2012 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23053870 (View on PubMed)

Wolfe AD, Denniston SF, Baker J, Catrine K, Hoover-Regan M. Bad News Deserves Better Communication: A Customizable Curriculum for Teaching Learners to Share Life-Altering Information in Pediatrics. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Aug 12;12:10438. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10438.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31139729 (View on PubMed)

Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Block SD. The status of medical education in end-of-life care: a national report. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep;18(9):685-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21215.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12950476 (View on PubMed)

Keefer P, Pituch K, Murphy T, et al. A child's last hours - multidisciplinary training in end-of-life care for professionals working in children's hospitals: newborn with lethal congenital anomalies. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10108. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10108

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Rock L, Gadmer N, Arnold R, et al. Critical care communication skills training for internal medicine residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10212. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10212

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Brock K, Cohen H, Sourkes B, et al. Teaching pediatric fellows palliative care through simulation and video intervention: a practical guide to implementation. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10284. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10284

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Brown C, Gephardt G, Lloyd C, Swearingen C, Boateng B. Teaching palliative care skills using simulated family encounters. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2011;7:8507. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.8507

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18929686 (View on PubMed)

Jackson J, Albertini L. Caring for children with chronic health care needs: an introductory curriculum for pediatric residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2012;8:9172. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9172

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Mintzer M, Chen A, Conway Copper T, et al. Breaking bad news using role playing: a multimedia instructional activity for teaching medical trainees. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2014;10:9798. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9798

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Reichert J, Parmelee D, Bognar S, Durgans K, Godoy M. A LION IN THE HOUSE module for health care education: pediatric end-of-life case studies. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2012;8:8362. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.8362

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Williams D, Fisicaro T, Hargraves R, Berg D. End-of-life communication education program for internal medicine residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2009;5:7945. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7945

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Anspacher M, Shah N. Palliative care for the medically complex child. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2013;9:9538. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9538

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

170675

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.