A Multicenter Implementation Study of the 3 Wishes Project
NCT ID: NCT04147169
Last Updated: 2019-11-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
730 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-04-27
2019-04-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the 3 Wishes Project could enhance compassionate care for dying patients and their families when implemented as a multicenter program. Given the importance of empowering frontline staff to adapt the 3WP to their own practice patterns, investigators did not protocolize this approach to personalizing end-of-life care. Investigators conceptualized this study as a formative evaluation of 3WP to examine its 1) Value: as experienced by family members, frontline clinicians, ICU managers and hospital administrators; 2) Transferability: successful implementation beyond the original ICU by a different mix of clinicians; 3) Affordability: cost of wishes being less than $50/patient; 4) Sustainability: project continuation beyond the first year of evaluation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preserving Compassionate End of Life Care in the Pandemic
NCT04602520
Wishes to Improve Support and Humanity at End-of-life in Safety-net Hospitals
NCT06277310
Work Package 3 Education for ICU Clinicians in Basic Palliative Care
NCT06425692
Addressing Palliative Care Needs Among Intensive Care Unit Family Members
NCT03506438
Feasibility Study on Implementing Consultation-based High-quality Palliative Care Services in Intensive Care Units
NCT06490835
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Implementation of the 3WP was aligned with the interests and cultural norms at each center, adapted by local clinicians with the resources available, assisted by close contact and informational guidance from the original site. Each center implemented the 3WP as both a clinical program and research project. Participating ICUs were all located in academic tertiary care centers with some differing features.
Design: This is a multi-center mixed-methods implementation and formative evaluation study. Data collection will be quantitative and qualitative (interviews and focus groups). Investigators will take a systems-level approach to produce information on how to implement the 3 Wishes Project in different settings, each with its own social microcosm, affordances and constraints.
Specific Aims are: 1) For patients, to provide compassionate end of life care consistent with their values and preferences; 2) For family members, to evaluate the project's impact on family views on end of life care; 3) For clinicians, to explore the project's impact on compassion, resilience, moral distress, and views on end of life care; 4) For ICU managers, to learn of any barriers to implementation and strategies for facilitation; and 5) For hospital administrators, to understand perceived costs and institutional benefits such as alignment with priorities for end of life care.
Investigators will use a case study approach examining particularities of the 'eco-system' of each ICU to examine how the 3 Wishes Project operates in each setting. This examination will include the constraints, affordances, and impacts available from the staffing model, organizational culture, end of life policies and administrative structure. An understanding of each ICU will be developed, with comparisons made to illuminate broader findings and suggest strategies for expanding the project elsewhere.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dying patients
Dying patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit who are approaching end-of-life.
Focused end-of-life conversations to promote connections among patients, family members and clinicians.
All eligible patients and families who were invited to participate in wish elicitation and implementation. For family interviews, criterion sampling was used. For the clinician focus groups, criterion sampling was used, based on involvement in the care of a 3WP patient. For the manager/hospital administrator interviews, purposive sampling was used, based on relevant leadership positions. Investigators employed qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyze data. Quantitative data include characteristics of patients, families and clinicians, questionnaire responses from families who agree to interviews, and clinicians who agree to focus groups, respectively, types of wishes elicited and implemented, and their cost. Qualitative data was obtained through individual family interviews, inter-professional clinician focus groups, project team field notes, additional ideas about the costs and benefits of the project from manager interviews, and analysis of project documents.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Focused end-of-life conversations to promote connections among patients, family members and clinicians.
All eligible patients and families who were invited to participate in wish elicitation and implementation. For family interviews, criterion sampling was used. For the clinician focus groups, criterion sampling was used, based on involvement in the care of a 3WP patient. For the manager/hospital administrator interviews, purposive sampling was used, based on relevant leadership positions. Investigators employed qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyze data. Quantitative data include characteristics of patients, families and clinicians, questionnaire responses from families who agree to interviews, and clinicians who agree to focus groups, respectively, types of wishes elicited and implemented, and their cost. Qualitative data was obtained through individual family interviews, inter-professional clinician focus groups, project team field notes, additional ideas about the costs and benefits of the project from manager interviews, and analysis of project documents.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient has a \>95% of dying during the ICU stay as judged by the ICU attending physician; or
3. a decision has been made to withdraw or withhold advanced life support in anticipation of death.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prohibitive logistics (e.g., patient admitted to the ICU for \<24 hours, or anticipated to die within 24 hours of screening)
3. Patient or family declines. (Note that a patient who has "no family" (even very broadly defined as friends and neighbours, or community members and case workers for homeless persons) would not be excluded from the wish elicitation and implementation component of the project.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Greenwall Foundation
UNKNOWN
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Joseph's Healthcare
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vanstone M, Neville TH, Swinton ME, Sadik M, Clarke FJ, LeBlanc A, Tam B, Takaoka A, Hoad N, Hancock J, McMullen S, Reeve B, Dechert W, Smith OM, Sandhu G, Lockington J, Cook DJ. Expanding the 3 Wishes Project for compassionate end-of-life care: a qualitative evaluation of local adaptations. BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jun 30;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00601-5.
Vanstone M, Neville TH, Clarke FJ, Swinton M, Sadik M, Takaoka A, Smith O, Baker AJ, LeBlanc A, Foster D, Dhingra V, Phung P, Xu XS, Kao Y, Heels-Ansdell D, Tam B, Toledo F, Boyle A, Cook DJ. Compassionate End-of-Life Care: Mixed-Methods Multisite Evaluation of the 3 Wishes Project. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):1-11. doi: 10.7326/M19-2438. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3WP_Multicenter
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.