Evaluation of an Intervention Designed to Enhance the Quality of Decision Support Provided to Patients Making Decisions About End-of-life Place of Care
NCT ID: NCT00614003
Last Updated: 2015-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-04-30
2008-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Project Description:
Using a two step approach I will study if the quality of providers decision support can be improved with an education. In step one nurses and care coordinators will be interviewed to identify factors that make it easier or more difficult to provide patient decision support. This information will be used to develop an education program. In step two, nurses and care coordinator volunteers will be assigned by a flip of a coin to either receive the decision support education or not. Before and after the education program the quality of the decision support participants provide will be measured and compared. As well, participants receiving the education program will be asked about their satisfaction with the education program.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Individualised Informal Caregiver Training for Palliative Care at Home
NCT02591693
Effect of Early Palliative Care on Quality of Life of Patients With Advanced Cancer: a Randomised Controlled Trial.
NCT01865396
Technology-enhanced Transitional Palliative Care for Family Caregivers
NCT03339271
Early Intervention vs. Standard Palliative Care in Improving End-of-Life Care in Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT00253383
Comparing Optimized Models of Primary And Specialist Services for Palliative Care: Pilot Feasibility Trial
NCT06629142
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In phase one a needs assessment will be conducted with about 20 key informants. In phase two, nurses will be randomly allocated to an intervention or control group. The intervention, informed by the needs assessment, is comprised of: an auto-tutorial; an interactive skills building workshop; a decision support protocol; performance feedback, and educational outreach.
Participants will be assessed: a) at baseline (quality of decision support); b) after the auto-tutorial (knowledge); and six to eight weeks after the other interventions (quality of decision support; confidence and intention to integrate decision support into practice). Between group differences in the primary outcome (quality of decision support scores) will be analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
decision support
Decision support skills building Intervention
Decision support skills
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decision support skills building Intervention
Decision support skills
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* are members of a regulated health profession
* care for palliative cancer patients, and/or
* cancer patients with advanced disease, and
* work at least 4 shifts per month,
* in a clinical area where end of life care discussions are likely to be undertaken, and
* are proficient in written and spoken English.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Annette O'Connor, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Elizabeths Health Care Agency
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Carefor Nursing Services
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
SCOHS Regional Palliative Care Community Services
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Community Care Access Center's (CCAC)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Murray MA, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Wilson KG. Efficacy of a training intervention on the quality of practitioners' decision support for patients deciding about place of care at the end of life: A randomized control trial: Study protocol. BMC Palliat Care. 2008 Apr 30;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-7-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-01-07-09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.