Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Modeling on Time to Palliative Care Review in an Inpatient Hospital Population

NCT ID: NCT03976297

Last Updated: 2020-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2231 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-19

Study Completion Date

2020-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigators are testing whether machine learning prediction models integrated into a health care model will accurately identify participants who may benefit from a comprehensive review by a palliative care specialist, and decrease time to receiving a palliative care consult in an inpatient setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The need for timely palliative care is crucial. Aging patient populations are becoming more complex, often needing care from multiple specialties. There has been a growing mismatch between clinical care and patient preferences particularly with regards to services near end-of-life. Research has shown that that most people prefer to die at home despite the majority dying outside of the home (nursing home or hospital). Given the current model of care and incentives palliative care is considered the care of last resort after all attempts at cure have been exhausted. This delay can lead to sub-optimal symptom management for pain and lower quality of life. As the demand for palliative care increases, policy initiatives and referral triage tools to that lead to quality palliative care services are needed.

In 2018 the Mayo Clinic developed a fully integrated information technology (IT) solution focusing on the identification of patients who may benefit from early palliative care review. The tool, known as Control Tower, pulls disparate data sources centered on a machine learning algorithm which predicts the need for palliative care in hospital. This algorithm was put into production as of December 2018 into a silent mode. The algorithm along with other key patient indicators are integrated into a graphical user interface (GUI) which allows a human operator to review the algorithm predictions and subsequently record the operator's assessment. The tool is expected to enhance risk assessment and create a healthcare model in which palliative care can pro-actively and effectively screen for patient need. Anticipated benefits of the approach include improved symptom control and patient satisfaction as well as a measurable impact on inpatient hospital mortality.

The overall objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and implementation of the Control Tower palliative care algorithm into hospital practice by creating a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial in 16 inpatient units. By creating an algorithm that automatically screens and monitors patient health status during inpatient hospitalization, the investigators hypothesize that participants will receive needed palliative care earlier than under the usual course of care. In addition to testing clinical effectiveness study members will also collect data for process measures to assess the algorithm and healthcare performance after translation of the prediction algorithm from a research domain to a practice setting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Palliative Care

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Machine learning Artificial Intelligence Pragmatic Clinical Trial Healthcare Delivery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Tower Intervention

For participants in the intervention arm, the results of the prediction model will be presented through a GUI interface hereby known as the Control Tower. Participants receive scores from Control Tower (0-100; higher score indicating increased need) for palliative care and are subsequently ranked from highest to lowest. Red (7 or greater) is considered high risk. The intervention will include a Control Tower operator who will interact with the inpatient palliative care consult service. The operator will monitor the Control Tower during weekday normal business hours and select daily a cohort of participants in the intervention units with the highest need of palliative care review. The final list of participants will then be sent to palliative care. The palliative care team who is on service will also assess the need for each participants, and those participants which they agree could benefit they will approach the attending clinical team to suggest a palliative care referral.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Control Tower

Intervention Type OTHER

A workstation and software tool that extracts medical data from Mayo's data mart and electronic health record, and processes it through a prediction model that determines whether a patient is suited for a palliative care consult.

Standard of Care

For participants who are not in an intervention period they will receive the standard of care commensurate with their clinical unit. This is feasible given that this is a pragmatic clinical trial where the investigators can easily control the communication between the control tower operator and palliative care team to prevent any contamination between clusters. In addition to the usual source of care control the investigators intentionally have calibrated the prediction model and the Control Tower review to match the average capacity of the palliative care service, knowing that that the team will still receive palliative care consults through the traditional pathway i.e. the attending care team consulting palliative care directly.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Control Tower

A workstation and software tool that extracts medical data from Mayo's data mart and electronic health record, and processes it through a prediction model that determines whether a patient is suited for a palliative care consult.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admitted to Mayo Clinic St. Mary's Hospital and Methodist Hospital during August 19, 2019 - August 19, 2020.
* Once a day Monday through Friday, the CT operator selects 12 patients from all of the nursing units that are participating in the trial (whether or not they are currently in the intervention group) with palliative scores of at least 7 (out of 100), i.e., those that are high risk and displayed as red in the CT GUI (unless they are already being seen by palliative care.)

Exclusion Criteria

* Once the CT operator identifies 12 appropriate patients or once they reaches the end of the high-risk patients (score of 7 or higher) they stop.


* We will exclude all patients who do not provide research authorization to review their medical records for general research studies in accordance with Minnesota Statute 144.335.
* We will exclude patients under the age of 18 years of age.
* We will exclude patients previously seen by Palliative care during the index hospital visit (i.e., green icon within CT user interface regardless of score)
* We will exclude patient who no longer have an active encounter (patients who have died or patients who have transferred to another facility are excluded) at the time of the review
* We will exclude patients currently enrolled with the Hospice service at Mayo
* We will exclude patients currently enrolled in the Palliative Homebound program (an alternative healthcare model at Mayo)
* We will exclude patients who are about to be discharged in the next 24 hours through indication of note
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jon Ebbert

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jon O Ebbert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wilson PM, Philpot LM, Ramar P, Storlie CB, Strand J, Morgan AA, Asai SW, Ebbert JO, Herasevich VD, Soleimani J, Pickering BW. Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 16;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34530871 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-002315

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id