A Media Communication Intervention to Increase Engagement in Advance Care Planning Among Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT04208009
Last Updated: 2021-04-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-01
2021-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Advance Care Planning: Promoting Effective and Aligned Communication in the Elderly
NCT03609177
Videos for Advance Care Planning in Young Adults
NCT04149704
Using Videos in Advance Care Planning for Patients With Advanced Cancer
NCT01241929
Using Video Images to Improve Advance Care Planning in Patients With Cancer
NCT00970125
UC Health Care Planning Study
NCT04012749
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The proposed intervention will address these limitations of prior interventions by developing a communication tool designed to engage cancer patients in ACP using a novel, empirically grounded communication tool animated videos. Prior research highlights the use of animated videos more effectively delivering medical information than written instructional materials, which have been traditionally used in previously developed ACP interventions. One prior study using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that animated videos were one of the most effective mediums for improving knowledge around patients' informed consent for medical procedures, being significantly higher than the use of text or no materials. Most notably, animated messages have been shown to significantly improve attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening among those with low health literacy as well as recall of information such that participants' recall of information matched those with high health literacy. Patients with low health literacy represent a disadvantaged group in regard to ACP as they have the lowest rates of advance directive completion (12% vs. 49.5% of those with adequate literacy).9 In summary, the use of animated videos to communicate the essential pieces of information around ACP and completion of advance directives holds great promise for improving patient knowledge and engagement in ACP among cancer patients, including those with low health literacy.
In the proposed study, a series of animated videos will be developed which will discuss: 1) what ACP is; 2) why patients should complete ACP now; 3) the importance of communicating wishes to loved ones, health care proxies, and medical team members; and 4) how to communicate these wishes and complete advance directives. These topics were selected based on Dr. Shen's preliminary data and prior research10 highlighting that the greatest barriers to engaging in ACP include: 1) lack of knowledge or awareness, 2) not viewing ACP as relevant to one's current situation, and 3) concerns around designating a health care proxy and communicating one's wishes. This study has three specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To identify usability and acceptability and obtain feedback for modifications of preliminary animated video content explaining ACP and advance directives using qualitative interviews with cancer patients.
Specific Aim 2: To develop animated videos on specific components of ACP (description of ACP; importance of engaging in ACP now; importance of communicating ACP to loved ones, health care proxies, and providers; and how to communicate wishes and complete advance directives) and evaluate the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the intervention.
Specific Aim 3: To evaluate patients' perceived ability to use the animated videos and their knowledge of and confidence in completing advance directives after viewing the videos.
First, this study will recruit n=15 patients with solid or liquid tumor cancer from oncology clinics at Weill Cornell Medicine to assess animated videos through initial sketches of content (called storyboards) using semi-structured interviews. Second, this study will develop and finalize the animated videos and field-test the intervention in an open trial among a new sample of cancer patients (n=30) to determine the feasibility, usability, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the intervention. We will assess outcomes at baseline and post-intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Advance care planning animated videos
This arm consists of viewing four advance care planning videos: 1) Description of ACP; 2) Explanation of the importance of engaging in ACP now; 3) Communicating wishes to one's loved ones and family members; and 4) Communicating wishes to one's doctor.
Advance care planning animated videos
Four advance care planning videos: 1) Description of ACP; 2) Explanation of the importance of engaging in ACP now; 3) Communicating wishes to one's loved ones and family members; and 4) Communicating wishes to one's doctor.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Advance care planning animated videos
Four advance care planning videos: 1) Description of ACP; 2) Explanation of the importance of engaging in ACP now; 3) Communicating wishes to one's loved ones and family members; and 4) Communicating wishes to one's doctor.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of cancer
* English fluency
Exclusion Criteria
21 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Megan Shen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-04020251
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.