Assessments and Recommendations for the Implementation of Advance Directives in Oncology

NCT ID: NCT02634632

Last Updated: 2015-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Legitimized by the Leonetti law of April 22, 2005, advance directives (AD) appear in various places of care that alongside the end of life, and even tend to be generalized to all areas related to health care in general. In this context, a prospective study to assess how the patient will seize the AD and identify the different problems writing these AD will be conducted. From this study, it will establish recommendations for the implementation of AD in the Multidisciplinary Oncology Department and Therapeutic Innovations service and in oncology in general. They will be asked patients if they choose to write their AD, complete and sign the AD pre-written in the book or not to draft their AD. The choice of the patients, but also the reasons they associate thereto and, where appropriate, their AD written will be collected. The patient will also inform its demographic and socio the case report (clinical data) should be completed by the investigator. During the first part of research, the use of AD by patients and will be assessed and analyzed in connection with the characteristics of these patients (history of the disease, course of care, socio-demographic) and the reasons they set out to explain their choice. For those who write their AD, they will, in a second step, subject to thematic content analysis to identify the main aspects that the subject convened to consider its end of life.This research therefore lead to the definition of the contours of a user device AD in oncology in general. This study was qualified biomedical research because of the sensitive nature of the study population and bring the patient to personal preoccupations when filling the questionnaire on the choice of directing advance directives and their contents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Having a Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Subjects with cancer

choose to write advance directives

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Choosing to write advance directives

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Choosing to write advance directives

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject both sexes
* Subject whose age is between 18 and 85 years
* Subject with cancer
* Subjects for which French is the native language, about having read, understood and signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject minors or subjects aged over 85 years
* Subject not including the French
* Subject with neurological or psychiatric disorders prohibiting their understanding of the study
* Subject private freedom following a judicial or administrative decision
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Marseille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

DESALBRES Urielle, Director

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0491382747

Email: [email protected]

DHORNE Jean, Manager

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0491381475

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

DESALBRES Urielle, Director

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-A00692-47

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RCAPHM15_0141

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id