Oocyte Recipient's Decision in the Number of Embryos to be Transferred
NCT ID: NCT03185715
Last Updated: 2017-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2017-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single Embryo Transfer vs. Double Embryo Transfer in an Oocyte Donation Programme
NCT01228474
Single Human Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproduction Programs
NCT01471951
Deferred Embryo Transfer in an In Vitro Program With Single Embryo Transfer Policy
NCT05721495
Single Embryo Transfer Versus Double Embryo Transfer
NCT00814398
Does Transfer of Poor-quality Embryos With Good-quality Embryos Improve Pregnancy Outcome in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI?
NCT03113097
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Counseling policy embryo transfer
All recipients completed a validated self-report questionnaire on the preference on the number of embryos to be transferred and the relevance for the decision-making process attributed to certain factors. The questionnaire also included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, medical-reproductive background and cycle's results and risks perception. All recipients received oral and written counselling. After counselling, during the treatment, the recipients completed a second questionnaire in order to check if their decision had changed.
Oral and written counselling
Recipients were informed about success rates of SET and DET and also about the possible risks of DET. All the information was given orally and written.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral and written counselling
Recipients were informed about success rates of SET and DET and also about the possible risks of DET. All the information was given orally and written.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sufficient knowledge of Spanish to fill out questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria
* Having had previous oocyte or embryo donation cycles.
* Insufficient knowledge of Spanish.
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundacion Dexeus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elisabet Clua Obrado
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elisabet Clua, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fundacion Dexeus
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Land JA, Evers JL. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod. 2003 Feb;18(2):455-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg081.
van Peperstraten AM, Nelen WL, Hermens RP, Jansen L, Scheenjes E, Braat DD, Grol RP, Kremer JA. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals. Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):2036-42. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den156. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
Ryan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):354-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 9.
Hope N, Rombauts L. Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):489-95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.080. Epub 2009 May 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SMD-2014-121
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.