Deferred Embryo Transfer in an In Vitro Program With Single Embryo Transfer Policy
NCT ID: NCT05721495
Last Updated: 2023-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2022-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objectives:
To assess the results of IVF / ICSI cycles with single embryo transfer, in terms of both pregnancy and live birth rates, comparing a group of patients in which an elective delayed cryotransfer of an embryo without fresh transfer is performed (experimental group ), with patients in whom a fresh embryo is transferred electively.
Methodology:
A prospective randomized clinical trial with two arms in parallel, not blinded, including 138 couples using an IVF / ICSI cycle at the Reproduction Unit of the Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves de Granada. The inclusion criteria classify them as having a good reproductive prognosis, and the patients will follow an ovulation treatment protocol with GnRH agonists or antagonists. Couples will undergo an IVF / ICSI cycle, randomly assigned to:
* Group I (experimental): fresh transfer is not performed, the best quality embryo is cryopreserved. Elective transfer in a later cycle of the cryopreserved embryo.
* Group II (control): fresh transfer of the best quality embryo.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single Embryo Transfer Versus Double Embryo Transfer
NCT00814398
Single Human Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproduction Programs
NCT01471951
Vitrification and Slow Freezing for Cryopreservation of Blastocyst
NCT02068924
Comparison of Thawing Embryos in Advance and on the Day of Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in FET Cycle
NCT04455191
Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer in IVF Patients With Few Embryos
NCT06746129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Group I (experimental): fresh transfer is not performed, the best quality embryo is cryopreserved. Elective transfer in a later cycle of the cryopreserved embryo.
* Group II (control): fresh transfer of the best quality embryo.
Subjects of study:
Patients who come to the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital to perform a first or second cycle of IVF / ICSI. Couples will be selected according to inclusion criteria that classify them as good reproductive prognosis (which is consistent with the usual eSET practice).
Couples will be able to participate in the study for only one cycle. Each couple will be interviewed to explain the characteristics of the study and will be given an Information Sheet. Written informed consent must be obtained from each couple. The person outside the research team who is guarding the randomization list will assign the corresponding treatment group.
Before starting the study, ethical approval was processed by the Ethics Committee through the Ethics Portal for Biomedical Research of Andalusia.
For the objective of assesing the null hypothesis that includes the equality of live birth rates in the group of women who undergo an elective deferred transfer of a single embryo and the group who undergo elective transfer of a fresh embryo, a power of 80% has been established to detect statistically significant differences by means of a bilateral Chi-square test for two independent samples, taking into account that the level of significance is 5%, and assuming that the proportion in the group of women who undergo a fresh transfer is 50.9%, the proportion in the group of women who receive the deferred elective transfer is 78%, and that the proportion of women with respect to the total is 50%, it will be necessary to include 48 women in each group, with the objetive to obtain 96 experimental units in the study. Taking into account that the expected dropout rate is three out of ten women, it will be necessary to include 69 women per group. The 138 women will be assigned to one of the groups using a random procedure, following a sequence of random numbers generated by specific software (Epidat, Epidemiological Data Analysis Program Tabulated. Version 3.1).
Methodology The patients must follow an ovulation stimulation treatment, in order to achieve multiple follicular development. A so-called "long analog" GnRH agonist protocol will be used. This consists of administering from day 22 of the cycle 0.1 mg / day of GnRH analog (Decapeptyl 0.1; Lasa, Barcelona, Spain) until the day on which the administration of gonadotropin is started, in which the dose is reduced at 50% until the day of hCG. After 10-14 days of administration of the agonist, the pituitary restraint is checked by means of ovarian vaginal ultrasound (absence of follicles and cysts) and serum estradiol determination (\<50 pg / mL). If this medical hypophysectomy is confirmed, 300 IU of recombinant FSH (FSHr) is administered per day (Gonal F, Serono, Madrid, Spain) for two days, and 150 IU of FSHr from the 3rd to the 7th day. On this day, ultrasound monitoring of follicular development and serum estradiol determination are performed in order to once again adjust the dose of rFSH to each patient. Once the follicular response is adequate (more than 3 ovarian follicles greater than 18 mm in diameter), ovulation is triggered using 6,500 IU of hCG (Ovitrelle, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
IVF / ICSI and embryo culture will then be performed. To perform sperm microinsemination (ICSI) it is necessary to remove the cumulus and radiated crown from the oocyte. To decumulate, the crown-oocyte cluster complex is submerged in a solution with 80 IU / mL of hyaluronidase (HYASE, IVF Science Scandinavia, Gothenburg, Sweden) for 10-20 seconds, aspirating the complex several times using a pasteur pipette. The microinsemination technique is performed under an inverted microscope with Eppendorf and Narishigue micromanipulators and microinjectors. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is performed in a five-well plate, depositing 0.5 mL of IVF medium (Vitrolife, Sweden) and 0.5 mL of Ovoil (Vitrolife, Sweden) in each well. Five cumulus are left per well and 100,000 sperm / mL are added. In both cases, the oocytes are cultured in a Thermo-Fisher incubator, within a morphokinetic platform (PrimoVision) that takes photographs of them every 5-10 minutes. The following days are evaluated for classification, choosing the one with the best implantation potential according to the division times measured by morphokinetics and the morphological criteria of the Spanish Association for the Study of Reproduction Biology (ASEBIR) reviewed in 2015.
The embryo transfer will be carried out in group 2 on the third day choosing the best embryo according to the previous criteria. In group 1, the embryos will be cryopreserved by vitrification, selecting the best one for delayed transfer. The commercial vitrification media (Medicult Vitrification, Denmark) and the storage device will be Cryoleaf (McGill Cryoleaf, Medicult, Denmark). All cryopreserved embryos will be stored in liquid nitrogen at -196ÂșC in storage cylinders (Air Liquide, France). The day before cryotransfer the embryo is devitrified, using the thawing kit (Medicult Warming, Denmark). At the end, the embryo is washed in G2 medium (Vitrolife), leaving it in culture until the next day, after evaluating the embryo quality and cryosurvival (percentage of lysed cells). The woman's endometrium is prepared by treatment with estradiol valerate and progesterone. On the day of cryotransfer, embryo quality is assessed again, with emphasis on embryo division. Cryotransfer is performed using the same technique as transfer.
Study limitations The project has been carried out taking into account the resources available in the Human Reproduction Unit of the University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, and therefore there do not seem to be any limitations in this regard.
The study could be completed by performing a preimplantation genetic diagnosis to determine if there are embryonic genetic alterations prior to intrauterine transfer, but this technique is not yet performed in our Unit. Likewise, blastocyst transfer can increase pregnancy rates, but by increasing the cancellation rate of embryo transfer, so it is not routinely performed in our Unit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Freeze all strategy embryo transfer
Three days after fecundation, the best embryo is criopreserved. It is transferred in a posterior cicle
freeze all strategy embryo transfer
criopreservation of all viable embryos in order to transfere the best one in a posterior cycle
Fresh embryo transfer strategy
Two or three days after fecundation, the best embryo is transferred.
fresh embryo transfer strategy
transfer of the best embryo two or three days after the fecundation technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
freeze all strategy embryo transfer
criopreservation of all viable embryos in order to transfere the best one in a posterior cycle
fresh embryo transfer strategy
transfer of the best embryo two or three days after the fecundation technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* AMH \> 0.5 ng/mL
* FIV/ICSI cycle: first or second
Exclusion Criteria
* endometriosis
* miscarriage \>1
* REM \< 1 million spz
18 Years
37 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Junta de Andalucia
OTHER_GOV
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ana Clavero Gilabert
Medical Clinical laboratory especialist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ana Clavero-Gilabert, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
HU Virgen de las Nieves
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PI-0353-2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.