Dehydr8 and Deactiv8

NCT ID: NCT03179072

Last Updated: 2020-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-19

Study Completion Date

2020-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Managing fluid status is a complex but fundamental part of the clinical care of people receiving haemodialysis (HD). Day-to-day fluid management is usually based on the concept of 'target weight' - the weight used to determine how much fluid should be removed during each dialysis session. However, the focus of this approach is usually on avoiding fluid overload (hypervolaemia), since this is associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular and pulmonary events, in addition to increased morbidity and morbidity. As a consequence, a significant proportion of people on maintenance HD spend a great deal of time in a dehydrated state. Although dehydration is known to be associated with a number of unwanted consequences (e.g. headaches, severe fatigue, impaired cognitive and physiological function), there has been little research focusing on the impact dehydration has on the physical and psychosocial well-being of this patient group. Considering the short life expectancy of individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) reliant on maintenance HD, particularly those who are unable to receive a renal transplant, we should be focused on improving their function and quality of life (QoL).

Key issues that need addressing prior to developing interventions in this cohort are 1) investigating the best and alternative measures to assess hydration status and 2) documenting the biopsychosocial impact of typical target weight driven HD in a well-designed study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) represents the final common pathway for all progressive renal disease. As of December 2014, 58,968 people in the UK were receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT), of which almost half were receiving maintenance haemodialysis (HD; UK Renal Registry Report (2014)). The Wessex Kidney Centre cares for \~1,600 patients receiving RRT, of which \>700 receive HD. The median age of our cohort is 66.7 years, similar to that of all incident UK-based patients in 2014 (64.5 years). The RRT recipient population is however growing and, increasingly, patients are more elderly with comorbidities. These individuals are unlikely to receive transplantation and will therefore depend on dialysis indefinitely. Optimising their quality of life (QoL) should be a priority.

Currently, a standard HD prescription includes a specific volume of ultrafiltration, set to achieve a clinically derived estimate of 'target weight'. Acutely, hypervolaemia (fluid overload) can be life threatening, whilst chronically it is associated with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk. Accordingly, target weight is typically prescribed to allow for interdialytic weight gains. The sequential reduction of target weight to achieve the lowest possible target weight (dry weight probing), thought to improve blood pressure (BP) control, left ventricular mass index and long-term outcomes, is favoured by many nephrologists. However, this results in dehydration and is associated with increased intradialytic symptoms, including intradialytic hypotension, which itself brings an increased risk of cardiac death. Local data from the Wessex Kidney Centre suggests that patients experiencing a greater drop in systolic BP pre- to post-dialysis are more likely to experience symptomatic hypotension during dialysis. Intradialytic BP variability is also detrimental to long-term outcomes. Achieving ideal hydration is therefore important for not only reducing symptomatology, but also improving BP control and cardiovascular health in these patients. Poor cardiovascular health contributes to the reduced physical function characterising this group, which along with physical (in)activity is associated with a poorer prognosis in this patient group. Furthermore, increased rates of depression and cardiovascular disease have been associated with poor physical function in this group.

There is, however, little research documenting how dehydration impacts individuals undergoing dialysis. Specifically, few studies have assessed the link between (de)hydration and frailty, although better physical function has been associated with a higher pre-dialysis BP, which may simply reflect better hydration. Experience from the Wessex Kidney Centre suggests that dehydrated dialysis patients suffer from increasing intradialytic symptomatology and a prolonged dialysis recovery time, during which they complain of prolonged fatigue. However, no studies have documented whether improving the hydration of dialysis patients improves not only their intra- and interdialytic symptomatology, but also their physiological/cognitive function, fatigue, physical (in)activity and, ultimately, QoL. Establishing the relationships between dehydration and these outcomes is essential, since hydration status can be easily and rapidly adjusted. One reason there is limited research in this area is that hydration status of individuals undergoing dialysis is difficult to objectively assess, which itself warrants further investigation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The participant must meet ALL of the following criteria to be considered eligible for the study:

* Male or female \> 18 years of age with ESRD and on maintenance HD for \> 3 months
* Haemoglobin \> 10 mg/dL
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
* Participant can understand and cooperate with the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria

The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following criteria apply:

* Haemoglobin ≤ 10 mg/dL
* Unable to understand or cooperate with the study protocol
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Swansea University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bangor University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Portsmouth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Zoe Saynor

Senior Lecturer in Physical Activity, Exercise and Health

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Alexandra Hospital

Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZS001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.