Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-07-19
2020-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Key issues that need addressing prior to developing interventions in this cohort are 1) investigating the best and alternative measures to assess hydration status and 2) documenting the biopsychosocial impact of typical target weight driven HD in a well-designed study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fluid Restriction and Quality of Life on Dialysis
NCT05264220
Combining Bioimpedance and Blood Volume Measurements in Haemodialysis
NCT03851185
pH, Hypoxia and Haemodialysis
NCT04501159
Blood Volume Analysis and Related Outcomes in Hemodialysis
NCT01679249
Can Dietitians Reduce Interdialytic Weight Gain in at Risk Hemodialysis Patients Through Tailored Education on Dietary Sodium and Fluid Intake?
NCT02130089
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, a standard HD prescription includes a specific volume of ultrafiltration, set to achieve a clinically derived estimate of 'target weight'. Acutely, hypervolaemia (fluid overload) can be life threatening, whilst chronically it is associated with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk. Accordingly, target weight is typically prescribed to allow for interdialytic weight gains. The sequential reduction of target weight to achieve the lowest possible target weight (dry weight probing), thought to improve blood pressure (BP) control, left ventricular mass index and long-term outcomes, is favoured by many nephrologists. However, this results in dehydration and is associated with increased intradialytic symptoms, including intradialytic hypotension, which itself brings an increased risk of cardiac death. Local data from the Wessex Kidney Centre suggests that patients experiencing a greater drop in systolic BP pre- to post-dialysis are more likely to experience symptomatic hypotension during dialysis. Intradialytic BP variability is also detrimental to long-term outcomes. Achieving ideal hydration is therefore important for not only reducing symptomatology, but also improving BP control and cardiovascular health in these patients. Poor cardiovascular health contributes to the reduced physical function characterising this group, which along with physical (in)activity is associated with a poorer prognosis in this patient group. Furthermore, increased rates of depression and cardiovascular disease have been associated with poor physical function in this group.
There is, however, little research documenting how dehydration impacts individuals undergoing dialysis. Specifically, few studies have assessed the link between (de)hydration and frailty, although better physical function has been associated with a higher pre-dialysis BP, which may simply reflect better hydration. Experience from the Wessex Kidney Centre suggests that dehydrated dialysis patients suffer from increasing intradialytic symptomatology and a prolonged dialysis recovery time, during which they complain of prolonged fatigue. However, no studies have documented whether improving the hydration of dialysis patients improves not only their intra- and interdialytic symptomatology, but also their physiological/cognitive function, fatigue, physical (in)activity and, ultimately, QoL. Establishing the relationships between dehydration and these outcomes is essential, since hydration status can be easily and rapidly adjusted. One reason there is limited research in this area is that hydration status of individuals undergoing dialysis is difficult to objectively assess, which itself warrants further investigation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female \> 18 years of age with ESRD and on maintenance HD for \> 3 months
* Haemoglobin \> 10 mg/dL
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
* Participant can understand and cooperate with the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* Haemoglobin ≤ 10 mg/dL
* Unable to understand or cooperate with the study protocol
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Swansea University
OTHER
Bangor University
OTHER
University of Portsmouth
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Zoe Saynor
Senior Lecturer in Physical Activity, Exercise and Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.