Initial Evaluation of the Cellie Coping Kit for Children With Injury

NCT ID: NCT03153696

Last Updated: 2020-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility (fidelity, acceptability, implementation, cost) of the Cellie Coping Kit for Children with Injury as well as to determine the intervention's efficacy (mechanisms of action and health outcomes).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this study is to assess the Cellie Coping Kit for Injury intervention feasibility and initial efficacy.

Aim 1: Intervention Feasibility Assess intervention feasibility (implementation, cost, fidelity).

Aim 2: Intervention Efficacy (Mechanisms of Action and Health Outcomes): Conduct initial efficacy evaluation of the Cellie Intervention on mechanisms of action (adherence and coping behaviors) and health outcomes (physical recovery, HRQOL, emotional health).

Hypotheses: At 6-week follow-up (T2), compared to a Treatment as Usual (TAU) control group, parents in the intervention group will report greater adherence to medical discharge instructions (H2.1) and encourage their child to use a higher number of adaptive coping strategies (cognitive, active, support seeking; H2.2); children in the intervention group will generate a greater number of adaptive coping strategies (H2.3).

Hypotheses: At a 12-week follow-up (T3), compared to TAU, children in the intervention group will report better HRQOL and emotional health (H2.4); parents in the intervention group will report better child HRQOL and child emotional health (H2.5). Objective injury recovery scores will be higher for the intervention group (H2.6).

Method: 80 children with injury and one parent per child will participate in a pilot RCT with a wait-list control design. Participants will complete baseline assessments of targeted study variables prior to randomization (40 to the intervention; 40 to usual care) and then repeat measures 6 (T2), 12 (T3), and 18 weeks (T4) later. Those in the immediate intervention condition will initiate the intervention following the T1 assessment. Those in the wait-list condition will initiate the intervention following the T3 assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cellie Intervention

The Cellie Coping Kit intervention is grounded in empirical evidence regarding injury recovery. By utilizing parents as coaches, the Cellie Coping intervention can be initiated in the hospital and continued as the child recovers at home. The intervention's portable, engaging design and active partnership with parents as consistently available coaches, allows families to use the intervention anywhere (i.e., home, hospital, during procedures) ensuring the child is supported at the time the injury-related stressor arises. The Cellie Coping Intervention consists of 1) a stuffed toy to promote engagement, 2) caregiver book, and 3) coping cards. Skills are presented in a way usable by most parents and children without medical team support. In this condition, children and parents will be introduced to the Cellie Intervention immediately following the completion of the T1 measures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cellie Coping Kit Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The Cellie Coping Kit intervention is grounded in empirical evidence regarding injury recovery. By utilizing parents as coaches, the Cellie Coping intervention can be initiated in the hospital and continued as the child recovers at home. The intervention's portable, engaging design and active partnership with parents as consistently available coaches, allows families to use the intervention anywhere (i.e., home, hospital, during procedures) ensuring the child is supported at the time the injury-related stressor arises. The Cellie Coping Intervention consists of 1) a stuffed toy to promote engagement, 2) caregiver book, and 3) coping cards. Skills are presented in a way usable by most parents and children without medical team support.

Cellie Wait-list Control

The Cellie Coping Kit intervention is grounded in empirical evidence regarding injury recovery. By utilizing parents as coaches, the Cellie Coping intervention can be initiated in the hospital and continued as the child recovers at home. The intervention's portable, engaging design and active partnership with parents as consistently available coaches, allows families to use the intervention anywhere (i.e., home, hospital, during procedures) ensuring the child is supported at the time the injury-related stressor arises. The Cellie Coping Intervention consists of 1) a stuffed toy to promote engagement, 2) caregiver book, and 3) coping cards. Skills are presented in a way usable by most parents and children without medical team support. In this condition, children and parents will be introduced to the Cellie Intervention via phone and mail following the completion of the T3 measures.

Group Type OTHER

Cellie Coping Kit Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The Cellie Coping Kit intervention is grounded in empirical evidence regarding injury recovery. By utilizing parents as coaches, the Cellie Coping intervention can be initiated in the hospital and continued as the child recovers at home. The intervention's portable, engaging design and active partnership with parents as consistently available coaches, allows families to use the intervention anywhere (i.e., home, hospital, during procedures) ensuring the child is supported at the time the injury-related stressor arises. The Cellie Coping Intervention consists of 1) a stuffed toy to promote engagement, 2) caregiver book, and 3) coping cards. Skills are presented in a way usable by most parents and children without medical team support.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cellie Coping Kit Intervention

The Cellie Coping Kit intervention is grounded in empirical evidence regarding injury recovery. By utilizing parents as coaches, the Cellie Coping intervention can be initiated in the hospital and continued as the child recovers at home. The intervention's portable, engaging design and active partnership with parents as consistently available coaches, allows families to use the intervention anywhere (i.e., home, hospital, during procedures) ensuring the child is supported at the time the injury-related stressor arises. The Cellie Coping Intervention consists of 1) a stuffed toy to promote engagement, 2) caregiver book, and 3) coping cards. Skills are presented in a way usable by most parents and children without medical team support.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* child has incurred an injury within the last month requiring medical attention
* one caregiver per child willing to participate
* sufficient English language skills to understand intervention and assessment materials
* access to internet or telephone for follow-up assessments

Exclusion Criteria

* injury resulting from family violence
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Meghan Marsac

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Meghan Marsac

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meghan Marsac, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kentucky

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marsac ML, Sprang G, Guller L, Kohser KL, Draus JM Jr, Kassam-Adams N. A parent-led intervention to promote recovery following pediatric injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Feb 18;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3207-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30777113 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-0187-P1G

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.