Manual vs Automated Anesthesia : Impact On The Incidence Of POCD
NCT ID: NCT03148730
Last Updated: 2020-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-10
2017-11-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Automated control of anesthetic depth (minimal episodes of overly deep or light anesthesia) and hemodynamics (via improved volume administration) can decrease the occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing moderate to high risk surgery (Better MOCA test in the postoperative period compared to the manual group \[+ two points in average\])
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery During Perioperative Period
NCT07314762
Automated Administration of Intravenous Compared With Inhalatory Anesthesia on the Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium
NCT03705728
Optimized Anesthesia to Reduce Postoperative Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly
NCT02698982
Anaesthetic Depth and Short Term Delirium Post Cardiac Surgery Intervention
NCT05877326
Rate of Postoperative Delirium and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03715244
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite steady improvements in surgical safety throughout recent years, the application of perioperative therapies still has the potential to be improved, especially regarding compliance to evidence-based recommendations.2, 3 Specifically, simply being surrounded by established monitors does not ensure that proper therapies are delivered most effectively or consistently to all patients - there must also be appropriate and timely interventions. Concordantly, large variations in patient care still exist and have been correlated with large variations in patient outcomes.4 Looking at the safety record that automation has achieved in fields ranging from manufacturing to commercial flight, medical researchers have developed devices utilizing self-contained feedback technologies (CLS) in an attempt to decrease the variability in treatment delivery with the ultimate goal of improving patient care. This development has flourished within anesthesiology, mainly via physiological closed-loop controlled devices. These systems are able to automatically adjust a therapeutic intervention based on continuous feedback from various physiological sensors.5 The best described systems have been closed-loop delivery of anesthetics, analgesics,6-11 volatile agents, insulin, and most recently, fluids 5, 12-14 and vasopressors.15-17 Overall, these systems have been shown to improve the consistency of intervention when compared to manual administration.10, 18, 19 Additionally, computer-assistance for clinical care will allow anesthesia providers to increase their accuracy and consistency, improve their awareness, and allow them to instead focus on more complex tasks.
Over the past years, members of our group have developed a dual closed-loop controller allowing the automated titration of propofol and remifentanil guided by the bispectral index (BIS).11, 20-22 The investigators also have created an adaptative closed-loop system for fluid titration using goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) strategies guided by a minimally invasive cardiac output monitor.5 The investigator has previously demonstrated the superiority of a controller versus human-guided anesthesia in maintaining a target of BIS between 40 and 60 while limiting the incidence of overly deep anesthesia, which is often associated with the occurrence of a cognitive dysfunction in the elderly 23 Very recently, the principal investigator submitted research evaluating the simultaneous use of 2 closed-loop system (anesthesia, analgesia and fluid management) in a pilot study of high risk vascular patients.
Objectives: The main objective of this prospective randomized single-blinded controlled study is to compare manual versus automated administration of anesthesia, analgesia, fluid and ventilation with regard to the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients undergoing high risk surgery. POCD will be assessed by a psychiatrist and/or a psychologist preoperatively, on postoperative day 3-10 (depending on the type of surgery) and at 3-months postoperatively. Additionally, quality of life and quality of recovery will also be self-assessed before surgery, before hospital discharge and at 3 month post-surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
manual group
This group will have a standard of care anesthesia. All the drugs, fluid and adjustement of ventilation settings will be done manually by the supervising anesthesiologist using the same drugs and fluids as the closed-loop group
No interventions assigned to this group
automated closed-loop group
This group will have a fully automated anesthesia, analgesia , ventilation and fluid management using 3 indenpendent closed-loop systems same drugs used in both groups ( propofol and remifentanil, Plasmalyte and /or Voluven)
closed-loop group
Use of 3 indenpendent closed-loop systems to deliver the propofol, remifentanil, fluid and to adjust ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
closed-loop group
Use of 3 indenpendent closed-loop systems to deliver the propofol, remifentanil, fluid and to adjust ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA score I-III
* Scheduled for non cardiac surgery under total intravenous anesthesia
* Self sufficient (living at home or in non medical institution)
* MOCA test preop \> 23/30
* No Stroke, alzeihmer, Parkinson disease
* Written informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* MOCA test \< 23/30
* Visual or hearing deficiency
* Atrial fibrillation, or other Contra indication to the use of dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness.
* Chronic renal failure ( creatinin level maximum at 2 mg/ml; no dialysis)
* Large liver resection : our center has a strict fluid /CVP fluid restriction in place
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasme University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alexandre Joosten, MD PhD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexandre Joosten, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasme
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasme
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P2015/539 / B406201526591
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.