Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-01
2026-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Septic Encephalopathy and Late Cognitive Dysfunction
NCT00772096
Pathogenesis and Cerebrovascular Manifestations of Septic Encephalopathy
NCT00410111
Cerebrovascular Autoregulation During Sepsis
NCT01029080
Value of Laboratory Biomarkers in Prediction of Outcome in Septic Patients
NCT06338124
Correlation of Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 With Sepsis-related Encephalopathy
NCT05451537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pathophysiology of SAE is a complex constellation of proposed mechanisms that include direct insult to brain tissue from circulating inflammatory mediators that are overexpressed in sepsis, disturbances in metabolic pathways, cellular hypoxia, disruption of the BBB integrity, alterations in neurotransmission, impairment of regulation of the brain perfusion. The consequence of this combination of neuroinflammatory and ischemic processes is neuronal degeneration and cell death (apoptosis).
It is difficult to diagnose SAE early, as sepsis is often a diagnosis of exclusion and can be occult in presentation. For example, emergency physicians may conduct diagnostic studies to evaluate for stroke, metabolic disturbance (i.e. hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, vitamin deficiency, medication reaction), toxicity, seizure or other acute neurologic condition. In addition, severe sepsis patients may be intubated and are often sedated, which poses a challenge to conducting a neurological assessment of their mental status. There may be changes in electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), or neuroimaging but these tests lack specificity and SAE remains a diagnosis of exclusion.
Injured neurons release neuron specific proteins that diffuse across the disrupted BBB into the blood and could have diagnostic relevance in diagnosing SAE. Neuron specific enolase (NSE) and S100 beta (S100B) are biomarkers currently used in the setting of SAE and have been studied clinically. There is a lack of human studies on other proteins such as GFAP, co-peptin, Tau, neurofilament light/ heavy chain, UCH-L1, SBDP, MBP, and secretoneurin that have been proposed as potential biomarkers of neurological outcome for other causes of acute brain dysfunction such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathies (HIE) and could potentially serve as candidate biomarkers to diagnose SAE.
Most studies lack a control cohort. The Investigator intends to sample sepsis patients that present to the emergency department but do not develop altered mental status within our study as well.
The Investigator therefore propose a prospective, observational study in which the study team will perform blood biomarker analysis from time of enrollment up to study day 3. This would be done by drawing blood at (0-30mins), and additional blood draws at hours 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72. The Investigator will then determine whether biomarker levels correlate with neurologic assessment in the Emergency Department (ED), degree of overall organ dysfunction, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and functional neurologic outcome at discharge and at 6 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sepsis with AMS
Patients presenting to the ED with suspected sepsis who develop altered mental status
Blood draws
Blood draws will be collected via venipuncture or IV at hours 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72 (7 draws total). Each draw would be up to 20 mL of blood (but no less than 10 mL).
Sepsis without AMS
Patients presenting to the ED with suspected sepsis without change in mental status
Blood draws
Blood draws will be collected via venipuncture or IV at hours 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72 (7 draws total). Each draw would be up to 20 mL of blood (but no less than 10 mL).
Control
Patients presenting to the ED with no suspicion of systemic inflammation that need hospitalization (control category)
Blood draws
Blood draws will be collected via venipuncture or IV at hours 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72 (7 draws total). Each draw would be up to 20 mL of blood (but no less than 10 mL).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood draws
Blood draws will be collected via venipuncture or IV at hours 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72 (7 draws total). Each draw would be up to 20 mL of blood (but no less than 10 mL).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ≥ 18 years old
* Presented to the emergency department at Shands
* Has not donated blood within the last 8 weeks
* Willing to participate and follow up at 6 months after discharge from the hospital
* Not anemic or have any other hematological disorders that requires transfusions
Meets two or more Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria:
* Temperature \>38°C or \<36°C
* Heart rate (HR) \> 90bpm
* Respiratory rate (RR) \> 20bpm or partial pressures of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) \<32mm mercury (HG)
* White Blood Cell (WBC) \>12,000/µL or \< 4,000/µL or \>10% immature/ bands Clinical suspicion of sepsis (blood cultures ordered/ antibiotics started) Altered mental status Enrolled within 6 hours of ED presentation
Cohort 2
* ≥ 18 years old
* Presented to the emergency department at Shands
* Has not donated blood within the last 8 weeks
* Willing to participate and follow up at 6 months after discharge from the hospital
* Not anemic or have any other hematological disorders that requires transfusions
Meets two or more SIRS criteria:
* Temperature \>38°C or \<36°C
* HR \> 90bpm
* RR \> 20bpm or PaCO 2 \<32mmHG
* WBC \>12,000/µL or \< 4,000/µL or \>10% immature/ bands Clinical suspicion of sepsis (blood cultures ordered/ antibiotics started) No altered mental status Enrolled within 6 hours of ED presentation
Cohort 3 (control)
* Does not meet SIRS criteria
* No clinical suspicion of sepsis (no cultures/ antibiotics ordered)
* Not altered
* Patient has admission orders
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject has neurodegenerative disease or other neurological disorder (dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorder, or brain tumours)
* History of neurosurgery within the last 30 days
* Acute brain injury within the last 30 days (ischemic/ haemorrhagic stroke, traumatic brain injury)
* Subject is anemic OR donated blood within the last 8 weeks OR has a hematological disorder that requires transfusions
* Subject has history of liver failure OR renal failure
* Pregnant or lactating female
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie-Carmelle Elie, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chaudhry N, Duggal AK. Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy. Adv Med. 2014;2014:762320. doi: 10.1155/2014/762320. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Bello JH, Park M. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy as a differential diagnosis with motor deficit plus altered mental status. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007 Apr;62(2):199-202. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322007000200017. No abstract available.
Sprung CL, Peduzzi PN, Shatney CH, Schein RM, Wilson MF, Sheagren JN, Hinshaw LB. Impact of encephalopathy on mortality in the sepsis syndrome. The Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1990 Aug;18(8):801-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199008000-00001.
Shankar-Hari M, Rubenfeld GD. Understanding Long-Term Outcomes Following Sepsis: Implications and Challenges. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 Nov;18(11):37. doi: 10.1007/s11908-016-0544-7.
Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1787-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1553.
Papadopoulos MC, Davies DC, Moss RF, Tighe D, Bennett ED. Pathophysiology of septic encephalopathy: a review. Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3019-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00057.
Consales G, De Gaudio AR. Sepsis associated encephalopathy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Jan-Feb;71(1-2):39-52. English, Italian.
Jacob A, Brorson JR, Alexander JJ. Septic encephalopathy: inflammation in man and mouse. Neurochem Int. 2011 Mar;58(4):472-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
Davies DC. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in septic encephalopathy and brain tumours. J Anat. 2002 Jun;200(6):639-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00065.x.
Polito A, Eischwald F, Maho AL, Polito A, Azabou E, Annane D, Chretien F, Stevens RD, Carlier R, Sharshar T. Pattern of brain injury in the acute setting of human septic shock. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 18;17(5):R204. doi: 10.1186/cc12899.
Zhang QH, Sheng ZY, Yao YM. Septic encephalopathy: when cytokines interact with acetylcholine in the brain. Mil Med Res. 2014 Sep 1;1:20. doi: 10.1186/2054-9369-1-20. eCollection 2014.
Szatmari S, Vegh T, Csomos A, Hallay J, Takacs I, Molnar C, Fulesdi B. Impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in sepsis-associated encephalopathy studied by acetazolamide test. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R50. doi: 10.1186/cc8939. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
Sharshar T, Annane D, de la Grandmaison GL, Brouland JP, Hopkinson NS, Francoise G. The neuropathology of septic shock. Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan;14(1):21-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00494.x.
Bozza FA, D'Avila JC, Ritter C, Sonneville R, Sharshar T, Dal-Pizzol F. Bioenergetics, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of septic encephalopathy. Shock. 2013 May;39 Suppl 1:10-6. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31828fade1.
Hirota K. Involvement of hypoxia-inducible factors in the dysregulation of oxygen homeostasis in sepsis. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2015;15(1):29-40. doi: 10.2174/1871529x15666150108115553.
Shehabi Y, Riker RR, Bokesch PM, Wisemandle W, Shintani A, Ely EW; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Delirium duration and mortality in lightly sedated, mechanically ventilated intensive care patients. Crit Care Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2311-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f85759.
Iacobone E, Bailly-Salin J, Polito A, Friedman D, Stevens RD, Sharshar T. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy and its differential diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S331-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6ed58.
Sonneville R, Verdonk F, Rauturier C, Klein IF, Wolff M, Annane D, Chretien F, Sharshar T. Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis. Ann Intensive Care. 2013 May 29;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-15.
Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB201700135
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.