Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial - Hemodynamics (CREST-H)

NCT ID: NCT03121209

Last Updated: 2025-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

385 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-18

Study Completion Date

2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We aim to determine whether cognitive impairment attributable to cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is reversible with restoration of flow. To accomplish this aim CREST-H will add on to the NINDS-sponsored CREST-2 trial (parallel, outcome-blinded Phase 3 clinical trials for patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis which will compare carotid endarterectomy plus intensive medical management (IMM) versus IMM alone (n=1,240), and carotid artery stenting plus IMM versus IMM alone (n=1,240) to prevent stroke and death).

CREST-H addresses the intriguing question of whether cognitive impairment can be reversed when it arises from abnormal cerebral hemodynamic perfusion in a hemodynamically impaired subset of the CREST-2 -randomized patients. We will enroll 385 patients from CREST-2, all of whom receive cognitive assessments at baseline and yearly thereafter. We anticipate identifying 100 patients with hemodynamic impairment as measured by an inter-hemispheral MRI perfusion "time to peak" (TTP) delay on the side of stenosis. Among those who are found to be hemodynamically impaired and have baseline cognitive impairment, the cognitive batteries at baseline and at 1 year will determine if those with flow failure who are randomized to a revascularization arm in CREST-2 will have better cognitive outcomes than those in the medical-only arm compared with this treatment difference for those who have no flow failure.

We hypothesize that hemodynamically significant "asymptomatic" carotid disease may represent one of the few examples of treatable causes of cognitive impairment. If cognitive decline can be reversed in these patients, then we will have established a new indication for carotid revascularization independent of the risk of recurrent stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

CREST-H sites will be drawn from actively-enrolling CREST-2 centers. The additional information obtained in CREST-H in this protocol will be the MR or CT imaging, which will be done at baseline for all patients enrolled in CREST-H, and at 1 year for those with hemodynamic impairment at baseline. The protocol will recommend an unblinded investigator at each CREST-H site who will order and obtain the study-related MRI sequences, upload de-identified image files to the CREST-2 central imaging site at U Maryland, and maintain blinding of the hemodynamic imaging data for their site (see Blinding below). Image analysis will be done at UCLA (for perfusion studies) and at Mayo Rochester for structural scans -- silent infarcts, WMH and microbleeds. Data management and statistical analysis will be done at UAB, which serves this role for CREST-2.

Cognitive Assessment.

CREST-H will use existing CREST-2 cognitive assessment infrastructure -- the Survey Research Unit at University of Alabama Birmingham. Added to the current CREST-2 battery is the Oral Trail Making A \& B as an additional measure of executive function, which will be administered to every CREST-2 patient, regardless of their participation in CREST-H. Cognitive assessments in CREST-H must take place prior to revascularization or within two weeks after assignment to medical therapy alone. Testing in CREST-2 is repeated at 1 year, and every year thereafter up to 4 years. At each test interval, a composite (mean) Z-score is derived from published normative samples for each test outcome. The CREST-H primary outcome will be at 1 year in which the change in the composite Z-score from baseline will be calculated. Covariates will include age, education and depression. The test battery will be administered by a blinded assessor the same way for all CREST-2 and CREST-H enrolled patients. The cognitive domains being assessed in CREST-2/H are entirely consistent with those encompassed within the NINDS Common Data Elements (CDE).

Imaging protocol.

Multimodal MRI or CT perfusion imaging will be performed at baseline on every study subject.

Multimodal MRI, including routine parenchymal sequences and PWI utilizing dynamic susceptibility contrast technique, will be acquired at each participating CREST H site who have been approved for this imaging modality. CT perfusion, using iodinated contrast, will be used as an alternative PWI image for sites approved for this modality. Imaging will take place within 14 days after CREST-H enrollment and prior to any CREST 2 intervention for those randomized to CEA or CAS.

Standardized contrast agent injection protocol, appropriate preparation, and IV setup is used to ensure good scan quality. An antecubital vein IV catheter of 18-20 gauge is required. A test injection will be performed with approximately 10 ml of normal saline solution.

MRI image acquisition DWI/ADC (b=0, 1000 s/mm2 applied in each of three principal gradient directions), FLAIR, high-resolution T1, and GRE sequences will be acquired on 1.5-3.0 T scanners equipped with echo-planar imaging capability, using standard clinical protocols at participating CREST-H sites Total scanning time will be approximately 40 minutes. PWI acquisition protocol will be standardized across all CREST-H sites, using sequential T2\*-weighted (gradient echo) EPI time sequence scanning. A modified 2-phase contrast injection scheme will be used to perform CEMRA and DSC perfusion imaging, without need for additional contrast.

CT perfusion imaging will follow the protocol outlined in the updated Imaging MOP for CREST-H. The CT perfusion study is identical to the clinical CTP protocol used for acute stroke imaging in most institutions.

Perfusion imaging analysis.

PWI source images will be sent to the core laboratory at UCLA and processed with the OleaSphere software platform, using deconvolution of tissue and arterial signals in an expedited manner, yielding standardized data regardless of the acquisition system at each site. Hemodynamic impairment is defined as TTP \>1.25 sec in the middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery territories of the ipsilateral hemisphere to the carotid lesion compared with the same territory in the opposite hemisphere. Longitudinal analyses will investigate the change in the TTP \>1.25 sec lesion at 1 year comparing the revascularization versus the medical only arm. Continuous values for this volumetric change will be used to calculate the correlation between degree of cognitive change and degree of perfusion change. The continuous Tmax variable, as well as standard perfusion parameters of CBV, CBF Tmax, and MTT will be analyzed on the serial imaging studies in each case with MR imaging. Co-registered, voxel-based changes in serial perfusion values will also be explored with multiparametric (e.g. CBV, CBF, Tmax, MTT) values.

Image de-identification and blinding.

All MR or CT image files will be de-identified under the supervision of an unblinded Investigator (UI) at each institution and uploaded to the CREST-2 Imaging Core site at U Maryland. In order to assure that the PWI scan information from CREST-H does not compromise the integrity of the parent trial, the results of the perfusion scan will be blinded to the investigator team.

Image transfer.

Participating sites will utilize the same file transfer protocol (ftp) to transfer images to U Maryland for CREST-H as is already established for CREST-2. The images will be stored in a HIPAA-compliant, firewall protected server within the U Maryland archival system. A CREST-2 dedicated ftp linkage between the VIC at U Maryland and UCLA; and the VIC at U Maryland and Mayo-Rochester will be utilized to make each perfusion image file available for download by UCLA (Liebeskind lab) and each structural image (DWI, FLAIR, GRE) by Mayo-Rochester (Huston lab).

MRI structural analysis.

Structural MRI analysis at Mayo-Rochester will utilize NIH NINDS Common Data Elements developed for the CREST-2 grant. The following definitions apply:

1. silent infarct --- non-confluent hyperintense lesion \>1mm on FLAIR sequence on 1-year MRI not present on baseline FLAIR MRI.
2. Cerebral microbleed - hypointense 1-2mm non-confluent lesion on baseline GRE sequence.
3. WMH volume -- White matter hyperintensity volume refers to confluent periventricular high intensity lesions on FLAIR imaging, and will be derived using an automated T2 WMH quantification at the Huston lab.

Data from image analysis (TTP delay, WMHV, silent infarct count, microbleed count) performed at UCLA and Mayo-Rochester will be entered electronically on CREST-H data forms via the CREST-2 SDCC website at UAB, where it will be stored on a separate webpage linked to the rest of the CREST-2 data, including baseline and yearly cognitive assessments. The electronic data entry system (eDES) for CREST-2 is a mature system, successfully reviewed by FDA audit in other studies, providing standard approaches for entry-confirmation-locking of data forms, and supporting range and validity checking for data provided.

. Analysis.

Specific Aim 1. To determine whether cognition can be improved by revascularization among a subset of CREST-2 patients with hemodynamic impairment at baseline.

The primary hypothesis is to assess if the magnitude of the treatment differences (revascularization versus medical management alone) differs between those with flow failure compared to those without flow failure using the Z-scored cognitive outcomes (C0, C(1). That is, the primary hypothesis is an interaction hypothesis that will be assessed using linear regression, specifically: (C1 - C0) = β0 + β1T + β2F + β3TF + β4C0 + (other covariates), where C1 is the cognitive z-score at year 1, C0 the cognitive z-score at baseline, T the treatment indicator variable, F the flow failure indicator variable, and βi the regression parameters to be estimated. The parameter of interest for the primary hypothesis is then β3 that would assess if the magnitude of treatment difference in the change in cognitive score between baseline and 1-year is similar for those with versus without flow failure.

Secondary Aims: To determine if the number of silent infarcts and white matter hyperintensity volume at 1 year is different between the revascularization and the medical-only arms.

For the secondary aims we will calculate the number of new silent cerebral infarctions occurring over the first year, and the change in the WMH volume. The approach for analysis of the number of new silent infarcts will depend on the average number and distribution of the number of new infarcts. The analytic approach will be linear regression if the number of new infarcts is large (considered more likely the case), or Poisson Regression if the number is smaller (considered less likely the case). The analysis of the change in WMH will use a linear regression approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Phase 3 prospective blinded outcome randomized clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
single blind by outcomes assessor

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Revascularization Arm (CEA or CAS)

These patients will have been randomized (via the parent trial, CREST-2) to receive intensive medical management as well as either Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA--if they are in the parent study Surgical trial) or Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS--if they are in the parent study Stenting trial).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Revascularization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in this arm are randomized to CEA/CAS plus IMM

Intensive Medical Management (IMM) Arm

These patients will have been randomized (via the parent trial, CREST-2) to receive medical management only, which includes aspirin. high dose cholesterol lowering agent to a target LDL\<70, intensive blood pressure management to target \<130/80, smoking cessation, and diabetic control.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in this arm are randomized to intensive medical management (IMM) alone

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Revascularization

Patients in this arm are randomized to CEA/CAS plus IMM

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intensive Medical Management (IMM) alone

Patients in this arm are randomized to intensive medical management (IMM) alone

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Enrolled and randomized into CREST-2 (parent study)
* age 35-86

Exclusion Criteria

* unable to undergo MRI (e.g. metal in body, pacemaker)
* known allergy gadolinium contrast dye
* pre-existing diagnosis of dementia
* contralateral ICA stenosis \>70% by MRA, CTA or Doppler ultrasound
* history of severe head trauma
* major depression
* education less than 8 years
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

86 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Maryland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Randolph S. Marshall, MD

Professor of Neurology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Randolph S Marshall, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Columbia University

Ronald M Lazar, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

E Sander Connolly, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Columbia University

David S Liebeskind, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of California, Los Angeles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville Hospital/ Heart Center Research Alabama

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center/ Barrow

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Central Arkansas Veteran's Healthcare System

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of California at Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

University of California San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco VA Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Hospital

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Florida Health at Shands

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Miami Hospital

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Mercy Health Riverside

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Health System

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland VA

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Adventist HealthCare/White Oak Medical Center

Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Michigan Vascular Center/McLaren-Flint

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Ltd./ North Memorial Medical Center

Golden Valley, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mercy Hospital St Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

SUNY Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Novant Health Forsythe

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio Health Research Institute

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

UPMC Altoona

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UPMC Presbyterian University Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The Miriam Hospital/ Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Central Heart Institute

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Tennova Healthcare/ Turkey Creek Medical Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Medical Center

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia Health System

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Inova Fairfax Health Care

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Overlake Hospital Medical Center

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medicine-Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

VA Puget Sound Health Care System

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Gundersen Clinic, Ltd

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Boniface Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Liebeskind DS, Connolly ES, Howard G, Lal BK, Huston J 3rd, Meschia JF, Brott TG. Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis - Hemodynamics (CREST-H): Study design and rationale. Int J Stroke. 2018 Dec;13(9):985-991. doi: 10.1177/1747493018790088. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30132751 (View on PubMed)

Marshall RS, Liebeskind DS, Iii JH, Edwards LJ, Howard G, Meschia JF, Brott TG, Lal BK, Heck D, Lanzino G, Sangha N, Kashyap VS, Morales CD, Cotton-Samuel D, Rivera AM, Brickman AM, Lazar RM. Cortical Thinning in High-Grade Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. J Stroke. 2023 Jan;25(1):92-100. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.02285. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36592969 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01NS097876-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

AAAR5617

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Endovascular Therapy for Low NIHSS Ischemic Strokes
NCT04167527 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3