Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) as a Treatment of Substance Use Disorders

NCT ID: NCT03114423

Last Updated: 2019-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-07

Study Completion Date

2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the established, therapeutic EMDR intervention for patients with substance use disorders (SUD). The EMDR method is an integrative and structured therapeutic method which assumes that memories which have been dysfunctionally stored can lead to harmful behavior. The EMDR protocol used for this clinical trials has been specifically developed for patients with SUD - the results should be compared with traditional therapy. For the assessment of the EMDR treatment some questionnaires are given at several times.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Substance use disorders (SUD) have been prominently described on a neuronal level as a chronic and relapsing brain disorder, which is associated with changes in emotion, motivation and cognition. Furthermore on a behavioral level, SUD have been found to be linked to an increased amount of attachment and personality pathology. More in general, SUD treatment has been demonstrated to be a complex phenomenon, with high relapse rates of 30-50% after (successful) treatment.

As emotion regulation is associated with a vast amount of parameters of mental health and psychological well-being such as more satisfied employment, healthier relationships, better academic performance, and physical health, the long-term abuse of drugs on the other hand plays a detrimental role in patients' emotions and mind-sets. Research suggests that individuals who cannot regulate their emotions in an adequate way in everyday life, experience more mental turbulences or confusions. In turn this deficit might lead to substance abuse as one kind of dysfunctional method to regulate inner tensions.

Specifically, an increased amount of impulsivity has been named as being predictive for addictive diseases. Accordingly, impulsivity was observed as being linked to a poorer SUD treatment outcome, especially by promoting relapse, as the emotion regulation is hindered and damaged in SUD patients. Thus the increase of capacities to moderate emotional strain becomes an important factor for the treatment of SUD. Accordingly, many SUD treatment approaches have developed specific techniques in order to address the deficient emotion regulation system. Furthermore a history of traumatic experiences may be essential for the therapeutic work, because individuals with SUD often present a history of trauma with comorbid rates of up to 75%. Consequentely, various findings suggest that traumatic experiences represent a high risk factor for the development of SUD.

The method of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an integrative and well structured psychotherapeutic treatment which has received approval as an efficacious evidence-based approach for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). EMDR, as a psychotherapeutic technique, accelerates the accessing and reprocessing of traumatic materials and supports the brain to release the nervous system from these traumatic experiences by means of normal handling of emotional information. Due to the fact that up to 40% of individuals with PTSD turn to substance abuse in their lifetime, EMDR is effective in the treatment of SUD especially in case of unsolved traumata, which are keeping up the vicious circle of SUD. Furthermore several studies suggest that EMDR is effective in addiction treatment by significantly reducing substance craving and thus also the rate of relapse, extending consecutive sobriety, as well as more than twice as many graduates in EMDR integrated programs. However, the evidence of the efficacy and effectiveness of EMDR on addiction treatment is still limited, because many findings are preliminary as being narratively or just case-study based or paying less attention to the role of emotions. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to further explore and determine the effectiveness of EMDR for the regulation of emotional processes in long-term addiction treatment.

This study is conceptualized as a randomized controlled trial with two groups: EMDR + TAU vs. TAU + sham intervention (TAU: Treatment As Usual; the sham intervention is a cognitive training). The groups are compared pre-treatment, post-treatment, and there are two follow-up points of assessment: one month after post-treatment and three months after post-treatment. There will be a total sample of 60 clinical SUD male participants, which will be investigated during their in-patient stay at a therapeutic community center (after an initial phase of acclimatization of six weeks). One half of the sample: 30 participants will receive EMDR + TAU (experimental group; EG), the other half receives TAU + sham intervention (control group; CG).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Psychotherapy Substance Use Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment As Usual + Treatment with EMDR

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMDR-Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

The EMDR-protocol from Hase (2008) was used

Treatment As Usual + Cognitive Training

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

For the training the COGPACK-program from Marker (2008) was used

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMDR-Therapy

The EMDR-protocol from Hase (2008) was used

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham Intervention

For the training the COGPACK-program from Marker (2008) was used

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male
* SUD diagnosis
* age between 18 and 60 years
* patient must be stationary for at least six weeks
* patient must be full contractual capability

Exclusion Criteria

* psychotic episode
* comorbid severe dissociative symptoms
* comorbid severe personality disorders
* organic conditional seizure disorders, and somatic disorders (e.g., severe cardiac arrhythmias).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Graz

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Center of Integrative Addiction Research, Austria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Human-Friedrich Unterrainer, PD DDr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Center of Integrative Addiction Research, Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Grüner Kreis, Verein zur Rehabilitation und Integration suchtkranker Menschen

Johnsdorf, Styria, Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rene Pilz, MSc MBA

Role: CONTACT

004331638581479

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Human-Friedrich Unterrainer, PD DDr.

Role: primary

0043 699 18195 990

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abel, N. J., & O'Brien, J. M. (2010). EMDR Treatment of Comorbid PTSD and Alcohol Dependence: A Case Example. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 4(2), 50-59. http://doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.4.2.50.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Abler, B., & Kessler, H. (2009). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Eine Deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und John. Diagnostica, 55(3), 144-152. http://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.144.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):217-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20015584 (View on PubMed)

Ursano RJ, Bell C, Eth S, Friedman M, Norwood A, Pfefferbaum B, Pynoos JD, Zatzick DF, Benedek DM, McIntyre JS, Charles SC, Altshuler K, Cook I, Cross CD, Mellman L, Moench LA, Norquist G, Twemlow SW, Woods S, Yager J; Work Group on ASD and PTSD; Steering Committee on Practice Guidelines. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;161(11 Suppl):3-31. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15617511 (View on PubMed)

Brown, S. H., Gilman, S. G., Goodman, E. G., Adler-Tapia, R., & Freng, S. (2015). Integrated Trauma Treatment in Drug Court: Combining EMDR Therapy and Seeking Safety. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 9(3), 123-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.9.3.123

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ersche KD, Sahakian BJ. The neuropsychology of amphetamine and opiate dependence: implications for treatment. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007 Sep;17(3):317-36. doi: 10.1007/s11065-007-9033-y. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17690986 (View on PubMed)

Flores, J. P., 2004. Addiction as an Attachment Disorder. Maryland: Jason Aronson Inc. Publishers. Franke, G. H. (2000). Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Göttingen: Beltz.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hase, M., Schallmayer, S., & Sack, M. (2008). EMDR Reprocessing of the Addiction Memory: Pretreatment, Posttreatment, and 1-Month Follow-Up. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2(3), 170-179. http://doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.2.3.170.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Homer BD, Solomon TM, Moeller RW, Mascia A, DeRaleau L, Halkitis PN. Methamphetamine abuse and impairment of social functioning: a review of the underlying neurophysiological causes and behavioral implications. Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):301-10. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.301.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18298273 (View on PubMed)

Jacobsen LK, Southwick SM, Kosten TR. Substance use disorders in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;158(8):1184-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.8.1184.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11481147 (View on PubMed)

Klinitzke G, Romppel M, Hauser W, Brahler E, Glaesmer H. [The German Version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): psychometric characteristics in a representative sample of the general population]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2012 Feb;62(2):47-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295495. Epub 2011 Dec 27. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22203470 (View on PubMed)

Lee, C. W., Taylor, G., & Drummond, P. D. (2006). The active ingredient in EMDR: Is it traditional exposure or dual focus of attention? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13(2), 97-107. http://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.479.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Loree AM, Lundahl LH, Ledgerwood DM. Impulsivity as a predictor of treatment outcome in substance use disorders: review and synthesis. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015 Mar;34(2):119-34. doi: 10.1111/dar.12132. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24684591 (View on PubMed)

Marich J. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in addiction continuing care: a phenomenological study of women in recovery. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;24(3):498-507. doi: 10.1037/a0018574.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20853935 (View on PubMed)

Marissen MA, Franken IH, Blanken P, van den Brink W, Hendriks VM. Cue exposure therapy for the treatment of opiate addiction: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(2):97-105. doi: 10.1159/000097968.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17230050 (View on PubMed)

Meysami-Bonab, S., Abolghasemi, A., Sheikhian, M., Barahmand, U., & Rasooliazad, M. (2012). The Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy on the Emotion Regulation and Emotion Recognition of Addicted Individuals. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(10), 33-37.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Moos RH, Moos BS. Rates and predictors of relapse after natural and treated remission from alcohol use disorders. Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):212-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01310.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16445550 (View on PubMed)

Ouimette P, Coolhart D, Funderburk JS, Wade M, Brown PJ. Precipitants of first substance use in recently abstinent substance use disorder patients with PTSD. Addict Behav. 2007 Aug;32(8):1719-27. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.020. Epub 2006 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17188816 (View on PubMed)

Parker, J. D. A., Taylor, R. N., Eastabrook, J. M., Schell, S. L., & Wood, L. M. (2008). Problem gambling in adolescence: Relationships with internet misuse, gaming abuse and emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(2), 174-180. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.018

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Schmidt S, Strauss B, Hoger D, Brahler E. [The Adult Attachment Scale (AAS) - psychometric evaluation and normation of the German version]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2004 Sep-Oct;54(9-10):375-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-815000. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15343479 (View on PubMed)

Schulz, H., Lang, K., Nübling, R., & Koch, U. (2003). Psychometrische Überprüfung einer Kurzform des Fragebogens zur Psychotherapiemotivation - FPTM-23. Diagnostica, 49(2), 83-93. http://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.83

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Solomon, R., & Shapiro, F. (2008). EMDR and the adaptive information processing model: Potential mechanisms of change. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2(4), 315-325. http://doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.2.4.315

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Swendsen J, Conway KP, Degenhardt L, Glantz M, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Sampson N, Kessler RC. Mental disorders as risk factors for substance use, abuse and dependence: results from the 10-year follow-up of the National Comorbidity Survey. Addiction. 2010 Jun;105(6):1117-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02902.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20331554 (View on PubMed)

Torchalla I, Nosen L, Rostam H, Allen P. Integrated treatment programs for individuals with concurrent substance use disorders and trauma experiences: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Jan;42(1):65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22035700 (View on PubMed)

Trinidad, D. R., Unger, J. B., Chou, C. P., & Anderson Johnson, C. (2004). The protective association of emotional intelligence with psychosocial smoking risk factors for adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 945-954. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00163-6

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Verdejo-Garcia A, Lawrence AJ, Clark L. Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):777-810. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003. Epub 2008 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18295884 (View on PubMed)

Verdejo-Garcia A, Lopez-Torrecillas F, Gimenez CO, Perez-Garcia M. Clinical implications and methodological challenges in the study of the neuropsychological correlates of cannabis, stimulant, and opioid abuse. Neuropsychol Rev. 2004 Mar;14(1):1-41. doi: 10.1023/b:nerv.0000026647.71528.83.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15260137 (View on PubMed)

Xie H, McHugo GJ, Fox MB, Drake RE. Substance abuse relapse in a ten-year prospective follow-up of clients with mental and substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Oct;56(10):1282-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1282.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16215196 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMDR_1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.