Theta Burst Stimulation as a Tool to Decrease Drinking in Treatment-seeking Alcohol Users
NCT ID: NCT04154111
Last Updated: 2025-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-26
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Developing Functional Connectivity-Guided TMS for Alcohol Use Disorder
NCT06415721
High-dose Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Alcohol Addiction
NCT05738174
Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder
NCT03829761
Influence of TMS on Attention Modulation
NCT05611502
Mitigating the Disinhibiting Effects of Alcohol With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT07188376
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the past 7 years, through the scaffolding of a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) P50 Center and a strong Brain Stimulation Research program, this multidisciplinary group of clinicians and neuroscientists has demonstrated) it is possible to differentially activate these circuits through TMS/Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) imaging TBS to the VMPFC decreases orbitofrontal cortex and ventral striatal/accumbens BOLD signal in heavy alcohol users TBS also decreases alcohol cue reactivity in this population and in AUD patients currently enrolled in intensive outpatient treatment, 10 days of TBS to the VMPFC is feasible, well-tolerated, increases 1 and 2 month retention rates, and attenuates limbic brain reactivity to alcohol cues after 1 month. While these studies provide a strong foundation for pursuing a larger multisite trial of TBS, the CNDS theory and other alcohol TMS studies suggests that the DLPLC may also be a fruitful treatment target. In a sham-controlled pilot study the study team recently compared the efficacy of VMPFC TBS to DLPFC TBS, and, to the study team's surprise demonstrated that a single session of DLPFC TBS had a greater effect on the brain response to alcohol cues than VMPFC TBS. To resolve this gap in understanding, the investigator proposes a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the relative efficacy of these 2 strategies as novel tools to improve AUD treatment outcomes (e.g. percent days abstinent up to 4 months after TMS treatment initiation). These outcomes will be measured with urine ethyl glucuronide (ETG) and blood carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) measurements. The study team will also evaluate the effect of these TBS treatments brain reactivity to alcohol cues. The investigator's long-term vision is that TBS would be used as an adjuvant to behavioral treatment, enabling individuals to maximize the likelihood of behavioral change.
180 treatment-seeking men and women recruited from the community at large, will be randomized to receive 15 visits of TMS (2x/day; 3x/week, 20-30 min intersession interval) of either real or sham TBS to the VMPFC or left DLPFC while they are enrolled in the proposed study. Randomization will occur after the participant has been consented and screened for eligibility and prior to the first treatment visit. Real/Sham TBS will be delivered three times per week for a total of 15 TMS visits. Quantitative ETG will be collected daily. Quantitative CDT will be collected monthly throughout the course of the study. Additional assessments and/or brain reactivity to alcohol cues will be measured at the following timepoints: baseline screening visit, MRI visit #1 (before TMS treatment visit 1), TMS treatment visits 1, 6, 11, and 15, MRI visit #2, and at the 3 monthly Follow Up visits. A saliva sample taken for genetic analysis of a specific Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) variant will be obtained on enrollment and used to also analyze across these measures and individual outcomes in response to TMS. Building on recent pilot data, the study team will test the hypotheses that for both Strategy 1 \& 2, real TBS will improve AUD treatment outcomes significantly more than sham. Analysis will be performed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) on change scores from baseline for each visit. The main independent variable in the ANOVA will be time (TMS visits 1, 6, 11, and 15), group (VMPFC vs. DLPFC TBS vs. sham) and their interaction.
Aim 1 (Strategy 1): Modulating the limbic system: VMPFC TBS. The study team will evaluate the effect of VMPFC TBS, relative to sham, on number of days abstinent (primary outcome) and heavy drinking days in 30 day intervals for 4 months. Participants will receive stimulation over the left frontal pole electroencephalogram (EEG)10-20 system: Frontal Pole 1 (FP1). This location has been used in previous studies in alcohol users which demonstrate VMPFC target engagement.
Aim 2 (Strategy 2): Modulating the executive system: DLPFC TBS. The study team will evaluate the effect of DLPFC TBS, relative to sham, on the parameters listed. TBS will be delivered over the left DLPFC EEG 10-20 system: Frontal 3 (F3) as this location has also been validated to reliable result in target engagement by this group.
Exploratory Aim- Baseline alcohol cue reactivity as a mediator of TBS clinical response. The study team will test the hypotheses that individuals with a higher ratio of (DLPFC-striatal)/(VMPFC-striatal) response to alcohol cues will be more likely to have a change in drinking after Strategy 2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Real TBS to the mPFC
Thirty sessions of real Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)
Real TBS to the vmPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; double blinded
Sham TBS to the mPFC
Thirty sessions of sham Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)
Sham TBS to the vmPFC
The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the skin beneath the coil.
Real TBS to the dlPFC
Thirty sessions of real Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
Real TBS to the dlPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system (double blinded).
Sham TBS to the dlPFC
Thirty sessions of sham Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
Sham TBS to the dlPFC
The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the skin beneath the coil.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Real TBS to the dlPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system (double blinded).
Sham TBS to the dlPFC
The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the skin beneath the coil.
Real TBS to the vmPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; double blinded
Sham TBS to the vmPFC
The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the skin beneath the coil.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Meets the DSM V criteria for having a current AUD, determined by DSM-V criteria, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V.
3. Has an AUDIT score above 8 (such that they are at least Medium Risk drinkers according to criteria).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Meets DSM V criteria for schizoaffective disorder. \[Note: The inclusion of subjects with affective and anxiety disorders is essential because of the marked frequency of the co-existence of mood and other anxiety disorders among patients with AUD at large.
3. Has current suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation.
4. Is currently taking or initiates a medication known to affect alcohol intake and/or craving (e.g., disulfiram. naltrexone, acamprosate, topiramate). \[Note: This exclusionary criterion is for scientific rather than safety or patient comfort reasons\].
5. Expects a change in their medical history in the next 6 months that would impair their participation in this study \[e.g. expected medical procedure, planned pregnancy, initiation of new medication\].
6. Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), planning to become pregnant, nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.
7. Suffers from chronic migraines (more than 50% of the days in a month).
8. Does not meet safety criteria for MRI and TMS
9. Is at elevated risk of seizure (i.e., has a history of seizures, is currently prescribed medications known to lower seizure threshold and has had a change in their medication).
10. Is currently enrolled in another form of treatment for alcohol use disorder (This is for scientific reasons to clarify the role of TMS as a treatment agent)
11. History of traumatic brain injury resulting in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, and/or having ever been informed he/she has an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
12. Not able to read and understand questionnaires, assessments, and the informed consent.
13. Clinical Intake Withdrawal Assessment (CIWA) \>5 (to prevent delivering TMS to individuals in withdrawal.
21 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
NIH
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Merideth A Addicott, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kinney KR, Kirse HA, Stewart NE, Ip EH, Saldana S, DeMaioNewton HE, Kimber M, Smith HR, Douglas HE, Kiraly DD, Hanlon CA, Addicott MA. Theta Burst Stimulation as a tool to decrease drinking in treatment-seeking alcohol users: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2025 Nov 10;26(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09093-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00061760
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.