Study of Re-operation Rate After Introduction of Evidence Based Algorithm for the Treatment of Ankle Fractures

NCT ID: NCT03107767

Last Updated: 2017-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is a high incidence of re-operations after surgery for ankle fractures. According to the Danish Fracture Database (DFDB) the re-operation rate, excluding hardware removal, is almost 10%.

We are conducting a study on the efficacy of an evidence based algorithm for the treatment of ankle fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment of ankle fractures is complex and includes assessment of fracture pattern, severity of soft-tissue involvement and general health- and functional status of the patients. Historically most fractures, undisplaced as well as displaced, were treated non-operatively with acceptable results but in recent years there is an increasing trend towards operative management of unstable fractures. Techniques for operative management of ankle fractures are varied and assessment of instability is mainly based on classic x-ray classification systems such as Lauge-Hansen or the AO that are difficult to reproduce\[6\].

We hypothesize that a standardized and evidence based approach to ankle fracture management will lead to a decrease in re-operation rate.

The aim of this study is to standardize the management of ankle fractures in our department, by introducing an algorithm based on best evidence present. We want to investigate:

1. The effect of this algorithm on the re-operation rate of surgically treated ankle fractures in a two-year prospective observational setup with a minimum of one-year of follow-up.
2. The need for surgery and functional outcome of patients with isolated lateral malleolus fractures in which the treatment is dictated by ankle stability assessed on weight bearing radiographs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Fractures Surgery Syndesmotic Injuries Posterior Malleolus Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

A prospective cohort, following the introduction of an evidence based algorithm, will be compared to a matched historical cohort from the previous years.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prospective Cohort

The prospective cohort following introduction of the evidence based algorithm for ankle fractures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PRO-malleol algorithm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

An evidence based algorithm for ankle fractures

Historical Cohort

Patients treated before introduction of algorithm. Matched to prospective cohort for comparison

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PRO-malleol algorithm

An evidence based algorithm for ankle fractures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients treated for ankle fractures at our institution during the study period are asked to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Not speaking danish Not followed up at our institution Not mentally capable of filling out questionnaire
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hvidovre University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter Toft Tengberg

Consultant, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hvidovre University Hospital

Hvidovre, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Peter T Tengberg, MD

Role: primary

+4561663676

Peter T Tengberg, MD

Role: backup

+4522971007

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO-Malleol study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.