Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-11-07
2022-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
NCT02198768
Study of Re-operation Rate After Introduction of Evidence Based Algorithm for the Treatment of Ankle Fractures
NCT03107767
Bracing After Ankle Fracture
NCT07163091
Operative Treatment of Ankle Fractures
NCT04437355
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Surgery for Ankle Fractures
NCT05389436
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome following ankle fractures.
Method:
All operated or non-operated ankle fractures in a period of one year from three different hospitals will be included. The following data will be recorded:
Civil registration number, age, rupture of the syndesmosis, use of alcohol, smoking, diabetes, characteristics of the ankle fracture (AO classification), type of treatment and complications.
Study participants will at time of diagnosis and 6, 12, 52 and 104 weeks following the injury received a questionaire with Manchester foot and ankle questionnaire (MOXFQ), Self-reported foot and ankle questionnaire (SEFAS), Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).
Which of the questionaire that should be used in the study will be determined when the questionaires have been compared in a different study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
questionaire
a questionaire is sent to each participans
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients who do not speak or understand danish
* mental disable patients
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kolding Sygehus
OTHER
Sygehus Lillebaelt
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
per hviid gundtoft
Principal Investigator, Senior House Officer, PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amager Hvidovre Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Sygehus Lillebaelt
Kolding, , Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ver2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.