Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics to Optimize Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

NCT ID: NCT03076723

Last Updated: 2022-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-13

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine if the so called pulsatility curve, which describes the relationship between intracranial pressure (ICP) and ICP pulsatility, can be used to predict outcome of treatment, in the form of shunt surgery, in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and to guide the adjustment of shunt opening pressure after the surgery. The main hypotheses of the study are:

1. The pulsatility curve may be the best auxiliary test to predict shunt surgery outcome in INPH patients. With a "fixed" shunt opening pressure, the preoperatively assessed potential pulse amplitude reduction (determined by analysis of the pulsatility curve) predicts postoperative improvement in gait velocity and cognitive functions.
2. A postoperative pulsatility curve can be used to further optimize ICP pulsatility by guiding opening pressure adjustment. Shunt adjustment based on the pulsatility curve three months postoperatively will increase improvement, but not complications, compared to a shunt with "fixed" opening pressure.

Based on these hypotheses, three specific aims for the study have been defined:

1. To determine if improvement three month after surgery is associated with postoperative reduction in pulse amplitude.
2. To determine if a pulsatility curve obtained preoperatively can predict improvement in gait velocity and cognitive functions in INPH patients three months after surgery.
3. To compare outcome six months after surgery and complications rates between INPH patients with a "fixed" opening pressure versus those where the shunt has been adjusted based on the pulsatility curve, three months after the shunt insertion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fixed opening pressure

The shunt opening pressure is changed to the same setting as at surgery.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Simulated change in shunt opening pressure

Intervention Type OTHER

The shunt opening pressure is reset to the same setting.

Individual shunt opening pressure

The shunt opening pressure is adjusted (up one step, down one step or unchanged) according to an individual analysis of the pulsatility curve (as assessed after shunt surgery).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Change in shunt opening pressure

Intervention Type OTHER

An individually determined change in shunt opening pressure is compared to no change in opening pressure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Change in shunt opening pressure

An individually determined change in shunt opening pressure is compared to no change in opening pressure.

Intervention Type OTHER

Simulated change in shunt opening pressure

The shunt opening pressure is reset to the same setting.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Possible or probable INPH according to the INPH guidelines.
* Symptom duration ≥ 3 months
* Age ≥50 years
* Able to walk 10 meters with or without an assistant device.
* Decision to recommend shunt surgery based either on:

* Improvement after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap (i.e. positive tap test), or;
* Increased CSF outflow resistance, or;
* A combination of "typical" signs/symptoms + "typical" MRI findings;
* A combination of a-c.

Exclusion Criteria

* NPH due to hemorrhage, meningitis or stroke (secondary NPH).
* Symptom duration ≥ 5 years.
* Patients considered surgical risk.
* Baseline gait velocity \>1.1 m/sec (60 m/min) without assistant device
* Mini Mental State Exam score ≤ 20 points.
* Musculoskeletal condition precluding gait assessment.
* Severe hearing or visual impairment
* Medication in the form of warfarin or novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC)
* Insufficient pressure data below resting pressure during the CSF infusion investigation, i.e. no complete assessment of the pulsatility curve
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uppsala University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kuopio University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Malm, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Umeå University Hospital

Sara Qvarlander, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Umeå University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kuopio university hospital

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Turku university hospital

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Sahlgrenska university hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå university hospital

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

The Uppsala university hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMU-2016-CSFD-PC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.