A Comparison Between Scalp Nerve Block and Scalp Infiltration

NCT ID: NCT03073889

Last Updated: 2017-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Forty ASA I or II patients, scheduled for aneurysm clipping were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Those patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group B (Scalp nerve block before skin incision n=15), Group I (Scalp infiltration before incision n=15), respectively with 0.75% of ropivacaine, and Group C (the control group, n=15). Opioids were used to control haemodynamic responses.All patients received the same general anesthesia.

After intubation, in group B, scalp block was performed by blocking the nerves that innervate the scalp, including the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital and lesser occipital nerves, and skin along the incision was infiltrated with 0.75% ropivacaine (group I, n = 15), respectively. For group C, there is no treatment. All patients received the same general anesthesia. The depth of anaesthesia was adjusted to maintain a BIS of 40-60. Characteristics of patients were recorded. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded preoperatively, after induction, before skin incision, the moment of incision, after skin incision. Plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10, CRP were measured before surgery, skin incision,after the surgery. Postoperative pain scores (VAS) for 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours after recovery of consciousness were also recorded. Postoperative complications ( nausea, vomiting, infection, and other adverse events) were monitored after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For group B, the scalp block was performed bilaterally with 0.75% ropivacaine by the anesthesiologist. The supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves emerge from the orbit, and a needle was introduced above the eyebrow perpendicular to the skin with ropivacaine and was then gradually withdrawn with simultaneous injection of solutions throughout the entire. The zygomaticotemporal nerve emerge lateral to the orbit, equal to the position of pterion, this nerve was blocked with ropivacaine. The auriculotemporal nerve was blocked bilaterally anterior to the ear at the level of the tragus, the needle was introduced perpendicularly to the skin and infiltration was performed deep to the fascia and superficially as the needle was withdrawn. Care must be taken to avoid destroying superficial temporal artery. The greater, lesser, and third occipital nerves may be blocked using a needle, with infiltration along the superior nuchal line, approximately halfway between the occipital protuberance and the mastoid process.

For group I patients, neurosurgeons infiltrated the planned incision by a needle penetrated deeply to the skin with 0.75% ropivacaine throughout the entire thickness of the scalp.Neither scalp block nor local infiltration was performed in the control group (group C).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aneurysm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Block

Scalp nerve block with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine before skin incision, n=15

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Scalp Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A scalp nerve block involves regional anesthesia to the nerves that innervate the scalp, including the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, branches of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve; the zygomaticotemporal nerves, terminal branch of division two of the trigeminal nerve; the auriculotemporal nerves, terminal branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve; the greater and lesser occipital nerves. The scalp block is performed bilaterally with 10 solution of 0.75% ropivacaine.

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Infiltration

Scalp infiltration with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine before incision, n=15

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Scalp infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Scalp infiltration before incision. Neurosurgeons infiltrate the planned incision by a 22-gauge needle penetrated deeply to the skin at a 45°angle with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine throughout the entire thickness of the scalp.

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Control

the control group has no treatment, n=15

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Scalp Nerve Block

A scalp nerve block involves regional anesthesia to the nerves that innervate the scalp, including the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, branches of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve; the zygomaticotemporal nerves, terminal branch of division two of the trigeminal nerve; the auriculotemporal nerves, terminal branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve; the greater and lesser occipital nerves. The scalp block is performed bilaterally with 10 solution of 0.75% ropivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Scalp infiltration

Scalp infiltration before incision. Neurosurgeons infiltrate the planned incision by a 22-gauge needle penetrated deeply to the skin at a 45°angle with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine throughout the entire thickness of the scalp.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
* Glasgow coma score (GSC) of 15

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA physical status of more than II
* A ruptured cerebral aneurysm and subarachnoid haemorrhage
* A history of allergy to opiates or any other drug used in the study
* Impaired renal, hepatic, or pulmonary function
* Allergic reaction to local anesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Xi Yang

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xi Yang

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mian PENG

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Zhongnan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhongnan hospital

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xi YANG

Role: CONTACT

0086-18207195370

Rui DONG

Role: CONTACT

086-13026317016

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yuanzhen ZHANG

Role: primary

027-67812787

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leslie K, Troedel S. Does anaesthesia care affect the outcome following craniotomy? J Clin Neurosci. 2002 May;9(3):231-6. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0934. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12093125 (View on PubMed)

Quiney N, Cooper R, Stoneham M, Walters F. Pain after craniotomy. A time for reappraisal? Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Jun;10(3):295-9. doi: 10.1080/02688699650040179.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8799542 (View on PubMed)

Pakulski C, Nowicki R, Badowicz B, Bak P, Mikulski K, Wojnarska B. Effect of scalp infiltration with lidocaine on the circulatory response to craniotomy. Med Sci Monit. 2001 Jul-Aug;7(4):725-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11433201 (View on PubMed)

Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, Dorman BH. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8942596 (View on PubMed)

Yang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Peng M. A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0760-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31153358 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.