Efficacy of Scalp Block in Managing Post Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Headache in Critically Ill Patients. A Single Centre Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT07307508
Last Updated: 2025-12-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-22
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm accounts for up to 85% of instances of SAH, occurring in approximately 3 to 25 people per 100,000 annually in most populations. Treatment of aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) includes prevention of re-bleeding, evacuation of space-occupying hematomas, management of hydrocephalus, and prevention of secondary cerebral insult. Severe headache is the predominant characteristic symptom of aSAH, developing almost instantaneously at ictus in 50% of cases and continuing into the first days. Its severity has a variety of physiological and psychological effects on the patient. Scalp blocks have been suggested to alleviate this headache in case series. However, there is no strong evidence supporting this intervention. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of scalp blocks on headache reduction in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of an aneurysm (coiling or flow diversion) with aneurysmal subarachnoid bleeding.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although there is evidence indicating that headaches related to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) result in hospital readmissions and cause long-term suffering, there is a lack of data guiding the management of headaches in the critical care setting. Current national and international guidelines from the American Heart Association and the Neurocritical Care Society do not offer evidence-based recommendations for managing headaches. Furthermore, the exact mechanism of headache pain after subarachnoid hemorrhage remains elusive. Some researchers have postulated that this pain may be caused by hemolysis's inflammatory byproducts, resulting in meningeal irritation in the subarachnoid space. Additionally, central pain sensitization mediated by N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors may cause hyperalgesia after SAH. The lack of a definitive mechanism makes selecting Pharmacotherapeutics is a significant challenge. Innovative, opioid-sparing treatment strategies for managing SAH-associated headaches are warranted based on the need to monitor neurological examinations, avoid over-sedation, and alleviate discomfort in SAH patients with headaches. Opioids, often in escalating doses, remain the mainstay of therapy, in addition to other medications such as paracetamol, ketorolac, and dihydrocodeine. However, major limitations of this approach include depressed consciousness and respiratory drive, nausea, ileus, urinary retention, hypotension, and the high potential for tolerance and addiction. Headache management often remains suboptimal despite steady consumption of analgesics. Despite these obvious drawbacks, providers continue to rely on opioid therapy.
Review articles typically mention headaches after SAH without making specific Recommendations for managing the headache after the initial episode. However, a recent study evaluating Pterygopalatine Fossa Blockade (PPF) as a novel, narcotic-sparing treatment for headache in seven patients with SAH showed that the worst pain recorded in the 24 hours before the block was significantly higher than in the period four hours after the block (9.1 vs 3.1; p 0.0156), and in the period eight hours after the block (9.1 vs 2.8; = p 0.0313). The only complication was minor oozing from the needle insertion sites, which subsided completely with gauze pressure within 1 minute. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of scalp blocks in reducing headaches associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of the aneurysm (coiling or flow diversion). To our knowledge, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine the role of scalp block in alleviating headaches associated with aSAH.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm (Scalp Block with Levobupivacaine)
Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive a scalp block using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine after endovascular intervention and before extubation. In addition to conventional pain managment
Levobupivacaine Scalp block
Scalp block will be administered using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine In addition to conventional analgesic therapy. It will be performed using an aseptic technique by a privileged anesthesiologist or intensivist after the endovascular coiling, while the patient is under general anesthesia, before extubation. The scalp block will be administered using anatomical landmarks over the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.
Control arm
Patients in the control group will receive no scalp block. Only conventional pain management will be given
Conventional analgesic therapy
The control group will recieve conventional therapy comprising regular intravenous paracetamol 1 gram every 6 hours intravenously plus fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levobupivacaine Scalp block
Scalp block will be administered using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine In addition to conventional analgesic therapy. It will be performed using an aseptic technique by a privileged anesthesiologist or intensivist after the endovascular coiling, while the patient is under general anesthesia, before extubation. The scalp block will be administered using anatomical landmarks over the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.
Conventional analgesic therapy
The control group will recieve conventional therapy comprising regular intravenous paracetamol 1 gram every 6 hours intravenously plus fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Non-aneurysmal subarachnoid or other intracranial hemorrhage forms (e.g., Intracerebral hemorrhage).
3. SICU admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13 or lower.
4. WFNS Score 4 / 5 or requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hrs.
5. Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics.
6. Admission to ICU \> 7 days after hemorrhage.
7. Patients with a documented bleeding disorder.
8. Patients with a history of chronic headache disorder or migraine.
9. Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamad Medical Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sohel Mohamed Ahmed, Consultant
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamad Medical Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamad Medical Corporation
Doha, , Qatar
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Sohel Gamal, Consultant
Role: primary
Abdelrahman Balal, MD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRC-01-23-789
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MRC-01-23-789
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id