Efficacy of Scalp Block in Managing Post Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Headache in Critically Ill Patients. A Single Centre Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT07307508

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-22

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating neurological disorder associated with significant mortality and morbidity rates, arising not just from the hemorrhage itself but also because of the catastrophic multisystem sequelae that can accompany the condition.

Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm accounts for up to 85% of instances of SAH, occurring in approximately 3 to 25 people per 100,000 annually in most populations. Treatment of aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) includes prevention of re-bleeding, evacuation of space-occupying hematomas, management of hydrocephalus, and prevention of secondary cerebral insult. Severe headache is the predominant characteristic symptom of aSAH, developing almost instantaneously at ictus in 50% of cases and continuing into the first days. Its severity has a variety of physiological and psychological effects on the patient. Scalp blocks have been suggested to alleviate this headache in case series. However, there is no strong evidence supporting this intervention. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of scalp blocks on headache reduction in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of an aneurysm (coiling or flow diversion) with aneurysmal subarachnoid bleeding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite its high prevalence, associated morbidity, and effects on the quality of life of aSAH-associated headache, epidemiological studies of its timing, severity, characteristics, and usual treatments are lacking. A prospective study in 2013 has shown that headache was the second-leading cause of 30-day hospital readmission after SAH. Long-term follow-up data indicate that headaches may persist after SAH for 2 to 9 years. Persistent headache leads to poor quality of life, increased therapy costs, delayed return to work, and increased incidence of depression.

Although there is evidence indicating that headaches related to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) result in hospital readmissions and cause long-term suffering, there is a lack of data guiding the management of headaches in the critical care setting. Current national and international guidelines from the American Heart Association and the Neurocritical Care Society do not offer evidence-based recommendations for managing headaches. Furthermore, the exact mechanism of headache pain after subarachnoid hemorrhage remains elusive. Some researchers have postulated that this pain may be caused by hemolysis's inflammatory byproducts, resulting in meningeal irritation in the subarachnoid space. Additionally, central pain sensitization mediated by N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors may cause hyperalgesia after SAH. The lack of a definitive mechanism makes selecting Pharmacotherapeutics is a significant challenge. Innovative, opioid-sparing treatment strategies for managing SAH-associated headaches are warranted based on the need to monitor neurological examinations, avoid over-sedation, and alleviate discomfort in SAH patients with headaches. Opioids, often in escalating doses, remain the mainstay of therapy, in addition to other medications such as paracetamol, ketorolac, and dihydrocodeine. However, major limitations of this approach include depressed consciousness and respiratory drive, nausea, ileus, urinary retention, hypotension, and the high potential for tolerance and addiction. Headache management often remains suboptimal despite steady consumption of analgesics. Despite these obvious drawbacks, providers continue to rely on opioid therapy.

Review articles typically mention headaches after SAH without making specific Recommendations for managing the headache after the initial episode. However, a recent study evaluating Pterygopalatine Fossa Blockade (PPF) as a novel, narcotic-sparing treatment for headache in seven patients with SAH showed that the worst pain recorded in the 24 hours before the block was significantly higher than in the period four hours after the block (9.1 vs 3.1; p 0.0156), and in the period eight hours after the block (9.1 vs 2.8; = p 0.0313). The only complication was minor oozing from the needle insertion sites, which subsided completely with gauze pressure within 1 minute. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of scalp blocks in reducing headaches associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of the aneurysm (coiling or flow diversion). To our knowledge, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine the role of scalp block in alleviating headaches associated with aSAH.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) Headache Disorders

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Headache Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Cerebral Aneurysm SAH-associated headache Scalp Block Levobupivacaine Opioid Consumption Neurocritical Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study involves a two-arm, randomized, parallel assignment. Recruited patients in the intervention group will receive a scalp block using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine, while the control group will not receive any scalp block. The scalp block will be performed using an aseptic technique by a privileged anesthesiologist or intensivist after the endovascular coiling, while the patient is under general anesthesia, before extubation. All patients enrolled in the study will be blinded to the group randomization. However, the investigators will not be blinded to group assignments.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
All patients enrolled in the study will be blinded to the group randomization. However, the investigators will not be blinded to group assignments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention arm (Scalp Block with Levobupivacaine)

Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive a scalp block using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine after endovascular intervention and before extubation. In addition to conventional pain managment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Levobupivacaine Scalp block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Scalp block will be administered using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine In addition to conventional analgesic therapy. It will be performed using an aseptic technique by a privileged anesthesiologist or intensivist after the endovascular coiling, while the patient is under general anesthesia, before extubation. The scalp block will be administered using anatomical landmarks over the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.

Control arm

Patients in the control group will receive no scalp block. Only conventional pain management will be given

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional analgesic therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

The control group will recieve conventional therapy comprising regular intravenous paracetamol 1 gram every 6 hours intravenously plus fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Levobupivacaine Scalp block

Scalp block will be administered using 20 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine In addition to conventional analgesic therapy. It will be performed using an aseptic technique by a privileged anesthesiologist or intensivist after the endovascular coiling, while the patient is under general anesthesia, before extubation. The scalp block will be administered using anatomical landmarks over the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional analgesic therapy

The control group will recieve conventional therapy comprising regular intravenous paracetamol 1 gram every 6 hours intravenously plus fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adults \> 18 years who are admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) with a confirmed diagnosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, undergoing endovascular treatment of the aneurysm (coiling/flow diversion).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with aSAH undergoing surgical craniotomy and aneurysmal clipping.
2. Non-aneurysmal subarachnoid or other intracranial hemorrhage forms (e.g., Intracerebral hemorrhage).
3. SICU admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13 or lower.
4. WFNS Score 4 / 5 or requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hrs.
5. Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics.
6. Admission to ICU \> 7 days after hemorrhage.
7. Patients with a documented bleeding disorder.
8. Patients with a history of chronic headache disorder or migraine.
9. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hamad Medical Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sohel Mohamed Ahmed, Consultant

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hamad Medical Corporation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamad Medical Corporation

Doha, , Qatar

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Qatar

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sohel Mohamed Ahmed, Consultant

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +97450586481

Email: [email protected]

Abdelrahman Balal, Clinical Fellow

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +97455993382

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sohel Gamal, Consultant

Role: primary

Abdelrahman Balal, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MRC-01-23-789

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MRC-01-23-789

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id