LIA in Hip Arthroscopy Patients

NCT ID: NCT03070054

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigator's are conducting a randomized, blinded study to determine if the extra-capsular local infiltration analgesic (LIA) administration of 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine can improve the postoperative pain management of hip arthroscopy patients. Participants will be randomly assigned to the LIA group or non-LIA group prior to surgery. Participants, anesthesiologists and PACU nurses will be blinded to group assignment, however the surgeon administering the LIA will be unblinded.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hip arthroscopy is a growing field in orthopedic medicine that has gained momentum in recent years as a treatment for an array of hip pathologies including labral tears, chondral injuries, loose bodies, hip instability, femoroacetabular impingement, extraarticular lesions, synovial abnormalities, ruptured ligamentum teres, osteonecrosis, and mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis. With this increased rate of hip arthroscopy has come an interest in adequate postoperative pain management.

There are a number of strategies to improve post-operative orthopedic pain management. One common technique is the femoral block, during which a patient receives an ultrasound-guided injection of local analgesia administered in close proximity to the nerve. In the hip arthroscopy setting, postoperative femoral nerve blocks have been shown to significantly decrease pain, reduce opioid related symptoms like nausea, and have higher pain satisfaction scores than patients using only morphine. However, this option can be costly as it is a separate procedure billed by the anesthesiologist. Regional nerve blocks also carry the risk of residual parasthesia and permanent nerve damage, however rare.

One way to circumvent these limitations is through local infiltration analgesia (LIA), a technique that has been described for post-operative pain management in orthopedic modalities like total knee arthroscopy (TKA) and total hip arthroscopy (THA). Injection of analgesic directly to the surgical site can easily be incorporated as a brief step in the surgical procedure at a minimal cost to the patient. In THA and TKA, LIA has resulted in promising decreases in pain and opioid consumption. However, interpretation of these results in the context of hip arthroscopy has been confounded by the fundamental differences between THA/TKA and hip arthroscopy, the array of different strategies used in LIA (eg. continuous infiltration via a catheter vs. a single shot), and a lack of placebo or control group, and the specific location of injection.

In the setting of hip arthroscopy, a previous group tested intra-portal injections with mixed results. LIA targeting the highly innervated hip capsule, which is cut to access the joint during arthroscopy, may be more efficacious at limiting postoperative pain. LIA injection into the hip capsule can occur under direct visualization after capsular repair. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the outcomes of this extracapsular LIA technique in the hip arthroscopy setting.

Documented risks involved with LIA are limited to the continuous infiltration via catheter. This approach has the risk of infection at the catheter site as well as cartilage damage. Our proposed technique avoids use of catheters and associated infection. The proposed single dose of 0.25% 20mL bupivacaine epinephrine a fraction of the dosages used in previous LIA studies to avoid chondral damage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Participants, anesthesiologists and PACU nurses will be blinded to group assignment, however the surgeon administering the LIA will be unblinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

non-LIA group prior to surgery

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Treatment

Extra-capsular local infiltration analgesic (LIA) administration of 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Extra-capsular local infiltration analgesic (LIA) administration of 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine

Extra-capsular local infiltration analgesic (LIA) administration of 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcaine, Sensorcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult (\>18 years) patients who have elected for hip arthroscopy surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are undergoing bilateral hip arthroscopy in a single surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen Aoki, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Utah Orthopaedic Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

90371

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.