Questionnaire for Metabolic Screening

NCT ID: NCT03048864

Last Updated: 2022-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-27

Study Completion Date

2023-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if kidney stone patients who should have received metabolic tests (urine collection over 24-hours that determines the composition of urine) based on Canadian Urologic Association (CUA) guidelines did in fact receive them, and if these results were explained to them by their doctor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the project is to determine whether metabolic workups are administered to Canadian kidney stone patients in accordance to CUA (Canadian Urologic Association) guidelines. Additionally, the study will look to evaluate whether the results of metabolic tests were sufficiently explained to patients by their doctors, and also whether or not patients would follow dietary or treatment plans to possibly prevent kidney stones based on these metabolic workups.

HYPOTHESIS:

The investigators hypothesize that the implementation of metabolic tests based on CUA guidelines is sub-optimal and that when they are prescribed, doctors do not adequately explain these results to patients. The investigators also hypothesize that patients would follow dietary and treatment plants to prevent recurrent stone formation based on these metabolic results - if they are prescribed to the patient.

JUSTIFICATION:

The investigators believe that implementation of metabolic workups is sub-optimal. The investigators would like to confirm this so that, in the future, metabolic workups can be promoted as an appropriate tool for identifying metabolic abnormalities that contribute to stone disease. If metabolic workups are administered and explained adequately to patients then further diet or treatment plans can significantly reduce recurrence of stones in stone patients.

OBJECTIVES:

1. Determine if metabolic workups were administered when they should have been according to CUA guidelines.
2. For patients who received metabolic workups, determine if the results from metabolic workups were explained to patients, and if so was it done adequately (did the patient understand the explanation)
3. Determine patient compliance regarding dietary and treatment plans based on metabolic workups

RESEARCH DESIGN:

This is a survey based study (one time completion) given to patients pre-ESWL. The surveys will be analyzed by research staff to determine the study objectives.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metabolic Evaluation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* at least 19 years of age, with at least 1 stone episode, ability to consent

Exclusion Criteria

* inability to provide informed consent, under 19 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Université de Montréal

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McGill University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dalhousie University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alberta

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of British Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ben Chew, MD

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nhaeem Bhojani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Université de Montréal

Ben H Chew, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of British Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nhaeem Bhojani, MD

Role: CONTACT

514-861-0213

Thomas J Grgic, BSc

Role: CONTACT

604 875 4111 ext. 62421

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Thomas J Grgic, BSc

Role: primary

6048754111 ext. 62421

Jonathan Lim, BSc

Role: backup

6048754111 ext. 62421

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H16-03324

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.