Robotic and Conventional Hand Therapy After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03020576

Last Updated: 2018-01-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Weakness is a major cause of disability in stroke survivors. Rehabilitation techniques are often not effective in restoring full function of the upper limb. Specifically, many individuals remain with weakness in the hand, preventing its return to full use.

Robotic therapies have been developed as exercise tools for stroke survivors. Devices, such as the InMotion2, have been shown to be useful in restoring some motor function in the upper limb. However, most existing devices designed to be used with the upper limb have primarily been developed to treat the shoulder, elbow and wrist. They have not specifically addressed hand function.

Tyromotion, Inc. has developed the Amadeo, which is primarily intended to provide rehabilitation for patients with neurological or orthopedic deficits in hand function. Initial clinical testing has demonstrated the practicality of using this device in a population of stroke survivors, although further research is needed to better understand the usefulness of the Amadeo device as compared with conventional rehabilitation methods. The purpose of this study was to compare results of training with the Amadeo device or training with conventional therapies.

A total of 28 subjects from two separate sites participated in the study and underwent baseline testing of upper limb motor and sensory performance and function. Subjects were then assigned to one of two treatment groups with a 50:50 chance of being in either group. One group underwent training with the Amadeo device and the other group underwent training with conventional therapy. All training sessions were 60 minutes in duration, three days/week for eight weeks (24 total sessions). Subjects were reassessed on completion of the training program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Therapy

Participants randomized to this arm will receive conventional based therapy to their affected upper limb dose matched with the Robotic Therapy group. These interventions are aimed at increasing range of motion, strength and function at the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

This arm involves treatment using conventional methods designed to promote range of motion, strength, coordination and function at the level of the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Robotic Therapy

Participants randomized to this arm will receive robotic based therapy using the Amadeo Hand Robot device to improve range of motion, strength, and coordination to the wrist and hand.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Amadeo Hand Robot Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

This is a robotic device designed to offer rehabilitation to remediate weakness and limitations of range of motion of the hand and fingers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Amadeo Hand Robot Device

This is a robotic device designed to offer rehabilitation to remediate weakness and limitations of range of motion of the hand and fingers.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Therapy

This arm involves treatment using conventional methods designed to promote range of motion, strength, coordination and function at the level of the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* history of stroke (\>3 months from time of ictus)
* paresis or plegia of the upper extremity.

Exclusion Criteria

* severe spasticity (defined on the Ashworth Scale with a score of 4-5)
* severe pain despite conventional pain therapy of the paretic upper extremity
* swelling, infection, fracture or ulcers of the paretic extremity
* arthritis of the hand joints
* pregnant
* botulinum toxin- therapy to the upper extremity within 3 months prior to study entry
* severe contractions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University Innsbruck

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joel Stein

Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine Chair

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joel Stein, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Raimund Helbok, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Innsbruck Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Innsbruck Medical University

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAI0093

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robots for Stroke Survivors
NCT00272259 TERMINATED PHASE1