Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Directed Oxygen Therapy

NCT ID: NCT02999932

Last Updated: 2023-07-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1706 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigators hypothesized that a relative low SpO2 directed oxygen therapy would reduced the mortality in patients staying longer than 72 hours in ICUs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In fear of harmful effect of hypoxia, oxygen therapy is commonly used, especially in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, hyperoxia can be harmful too. Examples are myocardial infarction (MI) patients and patients resuscitated to return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest. In Air Versus Oxygen in Myocardial Infarction (AVOID) trial, Meyhoff and colleagues proved hyperoxia caused more cardiac injury in patients with ST-elevation MI but without hypoxia. Kilgannon and colleagues found that arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest were associated with increased in-hospital mortality, and a pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 94-98% was recommended.

Recently, Panwar and colleagues found that compared to liberal oxygen strategy (SpO2 ≥96%), conservative oxygen strategy (SpO2 of 88%-92%) was feasible in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Girardis and colleagues found control oxygen therapy (targeting SpO2 of 94%-98% or PaO2 of 70-100mmHg) resulted lower ICU mortality than conventional oxygen therapy (SpO2 ≥97%) in the randomized clinical trial called Oxygen-ICU. However, the Oxygen-ICU trial was single-centered, early-terminated with only 480 patients included and led to an unplanned interim analysis. In this larger multicenter trial, investigators hypothesized that a relative low SpO2 directed oxygen therapy was safe and would reduced the 28-day mortality in patients staying longer than 72 hours in ICUs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low SpO2 group

SpO2 90-95%, with FiO2 as low as possible.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SpO2 directed oxygen therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Oxygen therapy was administered to achieve targeted SpO2.

High SpO2 group

SpO2 96-100%, with FiO2 no lower than 30%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SpO2 directed oxygen therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Oxygen therapy was administered to achieve targeted SpO2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SpO2 directed oxygen therapy

Oxygen therapy was administered to achieve targeted SpO2.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged 18 years or older and admitted into ICU, with expected stay in ICU more than 72 hours or longer.

Exclusion Criteria

* under 18 years old, expected stay in ICU less than 72 hours, unconsented inclusion, ICU readmission, patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstruction disease, patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100mmHg and PEEP ≥10cmH2O), decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment, physician forgetting to screen during 12 hours after admission, pregnancy, patients with acute myocardial infarction, paraquat poisoning and patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or planned to be on ECMO.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wu Jieping Medical Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xiaobo Yang, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shiying Yuan, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of critical care medicine,Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to ZhengZhou University

Luoyang, Henan, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine,Xinyang Central Hospital

Xinyang, Henan, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital

Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine,Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University

Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, Renmin Hospital of Shiyan City

Shiyan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, Taihe Hospital

Shiyan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Intensive Care Unit, Hubei Cancer Hospital

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine

Xiangyang, Hubei, China

Site Status

Department of critical care medicine, XiangYang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science

Xiangyang, Hubei, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WuhanUHICU201701

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

On-Demand Oxygen Delivery System Study
NCT02962570 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA