Quartet Lead With Defibrillator Multisite Algorithmic Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves outcomes and symptoms in selected patients with heart failure. However, around one third of suitable patients do not demonstrate benefit following device implantation when assessed by echocardiography (heart scanning). This group has poorer outcomes.

Response rate can be enhanced by altering timing delays between the pacing leads, but some patients still fail to improve.

Quadripolar left ventricular leads are now widely used in CRT. The lead's four poles increase the number of conformations available to the programmer, allowing multiple vectors to be programmed simultaneously or sequentially. This allows programming to avoid, for example, a patch of scar and find an area that will respond better to pacing. This technique is known as multi-site pacing. CRT is often implanted along with a defibrillator lead in the right ventricle, known as CRT-D. The defibrillator lead offers further combinations for pacing.

Goal of Research To evaluate an algorithm for assessing different multi-site pacing combinations in optimisation of CRT

Outline The investigators will recruit 24 consecutive patients undergoing CRT-D implantation for conventional indications at our hospital. At baseline, patients will undergo echocardiography, exercise testing and assessments of functional ability and quality of life. The device will be implanted as standard. Optimisation will be performed with an algorithm using different vector combinations and assessing the heart's efficiency through echocardiography and invasive pressure monitoring. The pacemaker will be programmed with standard settings. After twelve weeks, the baseline investigations and optimisation algorithm will be repeated and the device programmed according to the maximum efficiency. After a further 12 weeks, the same parameters will be measured to look for improved response to CRT.

Potential Benefit To increase the response rate to cardiac resynchronisation therapy and improve reliability of the technique

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Promote Q Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) and Quartet Left Ventricular Heart Lead Study

NCT00990665

Heart Failure

COMPLETED NA

RethinQ Study - Evaluating Pacing in Heart Failure Patients

NCT00132977

Heart Failure

COMPLETED PHASE3

QuickOpt Chronic Study

NCT01172067

Heart Failure

COMPLETED NA

Quadripolar Pacing Post Approval Study

NCT01555619

Heart Failure

COMPLETED

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Dyspnea and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)

NCT00700700

Congestive Heart Failure

TERMINATED PHASE4

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Design: This is an open-label, single centre, prospective, cohort study to assess the effect of algorithmic, echocardiography-guided optimisation of CRT-D following implantation of a left ventricular quadripolar lead.

Introduction and background:

There is now considerable evidence that cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves outcomes and symptoms in patients with heart failure. However, around a third of patients do not demonstrate any haemodynamic or functional benefit following device implantation. Earlier studies have used a cut-off of 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume to define response to CRT.

Failure to respond to CRT is felt to be multifactorial. Issues include:

* Anatomical limitations in terms of lead placement (the lead must be placed within a branch of the coronary sinus vein and therefore targeting to the site of maximum contraction delay can be difficult)
* Presence of areas of scar tissue, which are resistant to being paced
* Phrenic nerve stimulation with some pacing sites. The phrenic nerve runs close to the heart and may be stimulated by the pacemaker, with the effect that the patient's diaphragm is stimulated and they experience persistent hiccups.
* High pacing thresholds, which means that increased power from the pacemaker must be used to create a successful pacing stimulus (capture) and that in some instances, capture may not be achieved. This can be due to scar or to poor contact with the heart tissue.

Previous work has demonstrated that response can be improved in some patients by optimisation of inter- and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony and atrio-ventricular delay. However, this optimisation is limited by the fixed location of the leads after implantation, with pacing possible from the lead tip only. Multi-site pacing (MSP) with a quadripolar left ventricular lead has been introduced to increase the number of conformations available to the programmer and is especially useful in reducing phrenic nerve capture. Additionally, multiple vectors can be programmed sequentially or simultaneously, allowing for incorporation of a greater number of myocardial segments. Quadripolar left ventricular leads are now being routinely used in many hospitals. They offer new opportunities for optimising CRT-D (resynchronisation-defibrillator) devices by altering the pacing vectors between the four different poles on the lead and the two defibrillator coils to give hundreds of possible pacing combinations.

Several recent studies have been published looking at the effect of multi-site pacing on effectiveness of CRT therapy. Generally these employ limited vector combinations, but have already demonstrated beneficial effects on haemodynamics and echocardiographic measures of heart function. The evaluation of an algorithm that examines many more vector combinations, including in combination with the right ventricular defibrillator coils, has not been performed. The researchers propose to investigate this method of optimisation.

A gold standard for optimisation of CRT has yet to be defined. Methods employed predominantly include invasive haemodynamic measurement and echocardiography. The ideal method would have low inter-observer variability, high ease of use and rapid sampling rate to allow adjustments to be made and evaluated quickly. USCOM, a continuous-wave Doppler method of continually assessing cardiac output, has been successfully used in optimisation of CRT and has gained a patent, however has so far been used to optimise atrio-ventricular delay only. This method may prove a more accurate, rapid and convenient way to rapidly assess response to changes in pacemaker parameters. The investigators plan to evaluate these three methods of assessment and correlate with each other and with cardiovascular outcomes.

Hypothesis:

Use of an algorithm in optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy systems containing quadripolar left ventricular leads and dual coil right ventricular leads will increase response rate to this therapy.

Study structure:

Patients will be recruited consecutively amongst those undergoing implantation of a CRT-D device. At baseline, they will undergo assessment of functional capacity and echocardiographic parameters as well as invasive left ventricular pressure monitoring. The device will be implanted under normal laboratory conditions, aiming for a postero-lateral or lateral cardiac vein left ventricular lead position. Algorithmic echocardiography-guided optimisation of the devices will be conducted at the time of device implantation. Further assessment will be conducted simultaneously with haemodynamic left ventricular pressure monitoring and Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitoring (USCOM) during device optimisation. The devices will then be programmed with standard CRT parameters. Subjects will be seen at 12 weeks for echocardiographic and functional assessment, following which algorithmic optimisation will be repeated with haemodynamic and echocardiographic monitoring concurrently. Further assessment will be performed at 24 weeks as per baseline, following which the study will end.

Study population: 24 men and women, 18 years and older, who are able to attend follow-up assessment 12 and 24 weeks after implantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure, Systolic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Main patient cohort

Algorithmic Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation; Patients requiring CRT-D enrolled to receive algorithmic CRT optimisation at their device implantation. They will then be programmed to standard CRT settings for 12 weeks. Assessments will be performed and they will again undergo CRT optimisation using the specified algorithm. This time, they will be programmed to the settings giving maximal cardiac output on echocardiography, as assessed by LVOT VTI. After a further 12 weeks, they will again undergo assessment and the study will terminate.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Algorithmic Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of a computer algorithm to run through multiple combinations of pacing options in patients who have a Cardiac resynchronisation pacemaker with defibrillator where a quadripolar lead has been implanted. These quadripolar leads offer extra options for pacing locations across the heart, as well as for different combinations and sequences of pacing stimuli.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Algorithmic Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation

Use of a computer algorithm to run through multiple combinations of pacing options in patients who have a Cardiac resynchronisation pacemaker with defibrillator where a quadripolar lead has been implanted. These quadripolar leads offer extra options for pacing locations across the heart, as well as for different combinations and sequences of pacing stimuli.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Successful implantation of CRT-D device with quadripolar left ventricular lead and dual coil right ventricular lead.

Exclusion Criteria

* failed device implantation
* inability to complete the follow-up process
* inability to provide full written consent. Patients unable to perform cardiopulmonary exercise testing will be excluded from this assessment only and will be able to complete the remaining assessments.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No