A RCT of a Combination of Analgesics for Pain Management in Children With a Suspected Fracture
NCT ID: NCT02985177
Last Updated: 2022-11-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE4
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-31
2021-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators believe that the combination of different dosage of intranasal fentanyl with ibuprofen will lead to better pain treatment by providing a consistent and adequate level of analgesia throughout the entire ED visit, including prior to physician exam and during painful radiologic procedures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oral Analgesic Utilization for CHildhood Musculoskeletal Injuries
NCT02064894
Combined Analgesia to Control Pain in Children Seen in Emergency Department (ED) for a Trauma of a Limb
NCT01189773
Non-Steroidal or Opioid Analgesia Use for Children With Musculoskeletal Injuries
NCT03767933
Analgesic Efficacy of Morphine Alone or Combined With Paracetamol and/or Ibuprofen for Long-bones Fractures in Children
NCT02477007
Acute Pediatric Fracture Analgesia Study
NCT00520442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods. Design: This study is a single-blind, two-arm, three-centre RCT of a combination of analgesics for pain management of children presenting to the ED with a suspected fracture will be performed. Settings: Children will be recruited in the following EDs: CHU Sainte-Justine (Montreal, QC), Stollery Children's Hospital (Edmonton, AB), and Children's Hospital of the London Health Sciences Centre (London, ON). Sample. Inclusion criteria: Will be include children: (a) with a pain score \>49 mm on VAS at triage, (b) between the ages of 7 and 17 years, (c) presenting to the ED with a suspected fracture of the upper or lower limb, and (d) who can communicate in either French or English. Exclusion criteria: Will be exclude children with (a) known allergy to fentanyl or ibuprofen, (b) triage nurse suspicion of child abuse, (c) inability to self-report pain, (d) chronic pain that necessitates daily analgesic use, (e) NSAID or opioid analgesic use within the three hours prior to ED presentation, (f) trauma to \>1 limb, (g) known hepatic or renal disease/dysfunction, (h) known bleeding disorder, (i) neuro-cognitive disability that precludes assent and/or participating in the study, (j) known history of obstructive sleep apnea (k) a suspected fracture of the nose, or (l) significant head injury, as determined by the clinical team/triage nurse.
Allocation and Randomization: A biostatistician, independent to our study team, will generate the randomization scheme that will consist of a computer-generated random listing of the treatment using a 1:1 allocation scheme. Randomization will be stratified by center using block-randomization (with permuted block sizes). Enrolled children will be allocated to (a) INF 1.0 mcg/kg (up to a maximum of 100 mcg) via intranasal atomization + oral IBU 10 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 600 mg) OR (b) INF 2.0 mcg/kg (up to a maximum of 100 mcg) via intranasal atomization + oral IBU 10 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 600 mg.
Sample Size: Accounting for a 10% attrition rate, we determined that enrollment of 172 participants would provide at least 90 % power to detect a 10 mm absolute difference in mean pain scores between groups at 15 minutes post-medication administration (T-15), at an alpha level of 5 %.
Primary efficacy outcome: Mean difference in pain scores between groups at 15 minutes post-medication administration (T-15) using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes: (a) Mean differences in pain scores between groups at 30 min (T-30), 60 min (T-60), 90 min (T-90), 120 min (T-120) after medication administration, during the medical examination (T-ME), and during radiographic procedure (T-XR), (b) the proportion of children administered a rescue analgesic in the 60 minutes following administration of study medication, (c) the proportion of children with adverse events at T-15, T-30, T-60, T-90, T-120, T-ME and T-XR, (d) the proportion of children with serious adverse events at T-15, T-30, T-60, T-90, T-120, T-ME and T-XR, (e) the proportion of children in each group with an RSS score \> 3 (f) satisfaction of children and parents regarding pain management (T-120).
Relevance: In response to the persistent problem of inadequate and delayed analgesia, the investigators believe that a combination of rapidly acting (INF) and longer-acting (oral ibuprofen) medications will address both the delay in the time to effective analgesia and overall under-treatment of suspected fracture pain. The team anticipate that an RCT demonstrating the efficacy of a combination of fast and long-acting analgesics will significantly improve the treatment for children with a suspected fracture in the ED. The investigators hypothesize that use of INF2.0 and oral IBU will provide rapid pain relief that is sustained for the duration of the ED visit. Promotion of adequate acute pain treatment of children presenting to the ED will prevent the known short and long-term effects of inadequately treated pain in children previously demonstrated by our team, including unpleasant memories, stress and anxiety upon future visits to healthcare and compromised functional outcomes such as missed school.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
INF2.0 + IBU
The participant will receive a dose of intranasal fentanyl (2.0 mcg/kg) AND a dose of oral ibuprofen (10 mg/kg).
INF2.0 + IBU
Analgesics
INF1.0 + IBU
The participant will receive a dose of intranasal (1.0 mcg/kg) AND a dose of oral ibuprofen (10 mg/kg).
INF1.0 + IBU
Analgesics
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
INF2.0 + IBU
Analgesics
INF1.0 + IBU
Analgesics
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* between the ages of 7 and 17 years
* presenting to the ED with a suspected fracture of the upper of lower limb
* who can communicate in either French or English
Exclusion Criteria
* triage nurse suspicion of child abuse
* inability to self-report pain
* chronic pain that necessitates daily analgesic use
* NSAID or opioid use within the three hours prior to ED presentation
* trauma to \>1 limb
* known hepatic or renal disease/dysfunction
* known bleeding disorder
* neuro-cognitive disability that precludes assent and/or participating in the study
* known history of obstructive sleep apnea
* a suspected fracture of the nose
* significant head injury, as determined by the clinical team/triage nurse.
7 Years
17 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Justine's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sylvie Le May
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Le May Sylvie, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Justine's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stollery Children's Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Children's Hospital London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
99
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.