Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children With Acute Abdominal Pain
NCT ID: NCT06160778
Last Updated: 2024-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
495 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-27
2029-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ketorolac for Moderate to Severe Abdominal Pain in Children
NCT04528563
Comparison of Ketorolac at Three Doses in Children With Acute Pain
NCT05641363
Morphine PK Subgroup Analysis
NCT01322191
The Pharmacokinetics of Ketorolac Tromethamine Administered Intranasally (IN) for Postoperative Pain in Children Aged 12 Through 17 Years
NCT01363076
Morphine or Ketamine for Analgesia
NCT06835504
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if administering intravenous (IV) ketorolac is non inferior to IV morphine in reducing mean pain scores in children with suspected appendicitis.
Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be non-inferior to IV morphine
Specific Aim 2: To determine between group differences in rates of AEs. Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be associated with less AEs than IV morphine.
Design: A randomized quadruple blind (participant, clinician, outcome assessor, investigator) parallel group double-dummy trial in 4 Canadian pediatric EDs. Eligible patients will be 6-17 years with 5-days of moderate-severe pain (vNRS ≥5 ) being investigated for suspected appendicitis, with intravenous (IV) access, will be randomized to either:
1. IV ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg up to 30 mg (intervention) + IV morphine placebo (normal saline), or
2. IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg up to 5 mg (active control) + IV ketorolac placebo (normal saline).
Primary outcome: Between-group mean difference in pain on the vNRS at 60 minutes following administration.
Safety outcome: Proportion of children experiencing AEs related to study drug administration.
Secondary Outcomes: Between-group differences: (1) pain relief as measured on vNRS at 30, 90 and 120 minutes and at 6-8 hours; (2) proportion who achieves a 2-point vNRS (minimal important difference) pain score reduction at 60 and 120 minutes; (3) proportion of patients who change their baseline pain category (vNRS: mild 0-3, moderate 4-6, severe ≥7) at each time point; (4) time to effective analgesia as measured by the time when vNRS of \<3 is achieved (5) proportion of patients requiring additional analgesia; (6) total opioids administered (i.e., morphine equivalent mg/kg within 8 hours of treatment); (7) frequency of specific types of AEs (e.g., dizziness); (8) frequency of delayed appendicitis diagnosis; and (9) Ramsay Sedation Score at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.
Sample size:With a non-inferiority margin of 1.0 (50% of the minimal important difference), 600 participants would give a power of 0.9 (1- β) to establish non-inferiority of ketorolac vs. morphine (significance level α = 0.05).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ketorolac Tromethamine
Ketorolac tromethamine, an NSAID belonging to a group of non-opioid analgesics that inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes with strong analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. It is the only non-opioid parenteral non-sedating analgesic available in Canada for use to treat acute pain in the emergency department.
Ketorolac Tromethamine
Intravenous ketorolac given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.
normal saline
Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as morphine) given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
Morphine Sulfate
An intravenous opioid that is commonly used as part of usual care for treament of pain in patients with acute abdominal pain and suspected appendicitis.
Morphine Sulfate
Intravenous morphine given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
Normal saline
Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as ketorolac) given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketorolac Tromethamine
Intravenous ketorolac given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.
Morphine Sulfate
Intravenous morphine given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
normal saline
Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as morphine) given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
Normal saline
Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as ketorolac) given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Abdominal pain ≤5 days duration
3. Acute abdominal pain that is being investigated (suspected) by the clinical team for appendicitis
4. Patient with IV cannula in situ or ordered
5. Currently experiencing moderate to severe abdominal pain at rest or with movement: self-reported pain score ≥5 using the verbal Numerical Rating Scale
Exclusion Criteria
2. NSAID use within 3 hours and/or opioid use within 1 to 2 hours (1 hour post-IV or intra-nasal fentanyl and 2 hours post IV morphine).
3. Children who need immediate resuscitation, are hemodynamically unstable as deemed by the clinical team or have a Canadian Triage Assessment Score of 1
4. Significant caregiver and/or child cognitive impairment precluding the ability to complete study questions.
5. Chronic pain requiring daily analgesic use: confounding as response to analgesics maybe altered.
6. History of severe undiagnosed gastrointestinal bleeding requiring medical intervention, peptic or duodenal ulcer disease or inflammatory bowel disease, coagulation disorders, prior cerebrovascular bleeding, known arterio-vascular malformations. History of minor gastrointestinal bleeding from conditions such as resolved fissures, polyps or allergic colitis will not exclude patients from participating.
7. History of chronic and active interstitial kidney disease
8. History of chronic and active hepatocellular disease: ketorolac is metabolized by the liver.
9. Known or suspected pregnancy at the time of enrollment or breastfeeding females
10. Known hypersensitivity to NSAIDs or opioids.
11. Absence of a parent/guardian for children who are \<16 years of age if they are not a mature minor.
12. Inability to obtain consent due to a language barrier and the absence of language translator in person or by a phone translation service available in the ED.
6 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Eltorki, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alberta Children's Hospital Emergency Department
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-0952
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.