Pain Reduction for Limb Injuries in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Intranasal Fentanyl or Intranasal Ketamine vs Oral Morphine

NCT ID: NCT06464146

Last Updated: 2025-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-26

Study Completion Date

2028-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if IN fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg) or IN ketamine (1 mg/kg) is more effective at 30 minutes than oral morphine (0.5 mg/kg) in reduction of moderate and severe pain associated with limb injuries in patients 2-17 years of age presenting to the ED.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In children with moderate to severe pain due to musculoskeletal injuries, the first-line analgesic therapy in pediatric emergency departments (ED) is oral or intravenous morphine. Due to the delay or discomfort associated with establishing IV access, oral forms are preferred in French ED. Unfortunately, oral morphine alone or with ibuprofen or paracetamol, none regimen is optimal for relieving pain in children with traumatic limb injuries. However, the use of intranasal course is a safe route that can provide rapid and almost immediate analgesia. Intranasal administration is easy, non-invasive and usually well tolerated by children. In the last years, drugs with analgesic and sedative properties is increasing, particularly on fentanyl, ketamine, which can be also administered by the IN route. There are currently no studies, neither published nor ongoing, which compare IN fentanyl or IN ketamine to a standard oral morphine for children with acute moderate to severe pain with limb injuries presenting to the ED. The main hypothesis is that the efficacy of the analgesia 30 minutes after the administration will be higher with IN Fentanyl or with IN Ketamine, when compared to oral morphine.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Limb Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Morphine

Oral morphine (0.5mg/kg) and IN placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

oral morphine (0.5 mg / kg)

NaCl 0,9 %

Intervention Type DRUG

Injectable solution used as Placebo of Oral morphine or IN fentanyl/ ketamine.

IN Fentanyl

placebo of oral morphine and IN fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IN fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

IN fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg)

NaCl 0,9 %

Intervention Type DRUG

Injectable solution used as Placebo of Oral morphine or IN fentanyl/ ketamine.

IN Ketamin

placebo of oral morphine and IN ketamine (1 mg/kg)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IN ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

IN ketamine (1 mg/kg)

NaCl 0,9 %

Intervention Type DRUG

Injectable solution used as Placebo of Oral morphine or IN fentanyl/ ketamine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Morphine

oral morphine (0.5 mg / kg)

Intervention Type DRUG

IN fentanyl

IN fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg)

Intervention Type DRUG

IN ketamine

IN ketamine (1 mg/kg)

Intervention Type DRUG

NaCl 0,9 %

Injectable solution used as Placebo of Oral morphine or IN fentanyl/ ketamine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Child aged 2 years to 17 years and 11 months
* With 10 kg ≤ Weight ≤ 100 kg
* Presenting to ED with a traumatic pain and suspected fracture(s) based on an acute deformity AND experiencing pain and/or functional impotence in the injured limb(s)
* Within the first 12 hours after the injury
* VAS pain score at ED arrival ≥ 60/100 (if child ≥ 7 years) or Evendol pain score at ED arrival ≥ 7/15 (if child \< 7 years)
* Affiliated to health insurance
* At least one signed parental informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Received narcotic pain medication prior to arrival
* Contraindication to morphine, mentioned in SmPC
* Hypersensitivity to ketamine or fentanyl or to excipients (sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide), or to other opioids.
* Contraindication to fentanyl or ketamine, mentioned in SmPC
* GCS \<15
* Evidence of significant femur, head, chest, abdominal, or spine injury
* Open fracture
* Nasal trauma or complete nasal obstruction
* Active epistaxis
* Nasal or sinus surgery within 6 months before inclusion
* History of high blood pressure, known coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, acute glaucoma, increased intracranial pressure, major psychiatric disorder, hepatocellular insufficiency
* Active or history of psychiatric disorder
* Known pregnancy or suspicion of being pregnant
* Breastfeeding
* Non-French speaking parent and / or child.
* Participation to another interventional clinical research
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hélène CHAPPUY, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ambroise Paré Hospital

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Roger Salengro Hospital

Lille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Timone Hospital

Marseille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Mère-Enfant Hospital

Nantes, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Hopital Necker Enfants malades

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hélène CHAPPUY, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+33 1 44 49 41 26

Nelly BRIAND, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0144381862

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marlène MICHELON JOUNEAUX, MD, PhD

Role: primary

01 49 09 57 00

Melany LIBER, MD, PhD

Role: primary

03 20 44 46 64 ext. +33

Aurélie MORAND, MD, PHD

Role: primary

04 91 38 96 99 ext. +33

Adeline BOUCHERON

Role: primary

02 44 76 84 79 ext. +33

Hélène CHAPPUY, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+33 1 44 49 41 26 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-506803-25

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

APHP211044

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.