Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2017-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neurofeedback Training's Efficiency for Attentionnal Performances
NCT05924659
Effect of Amygdala Neurofeedback on Depressive Symptoms and Processing Biases
NCT02079610
Investigating Electroencephalographic Predictors of Default Mode Network Anticorrelation in Healthy Adults
NCT05592600
Neurofeedback Using TMS as an Assessment Tool
NCT01993316
Role of the Brain in Processing Visually Presented Objects
NCT00357695
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Control Intervention: Placebo-Neurofeedback, 20 sessions
Placebo-Neurofeedback
The Intervention used for the control-group consists of a sham-neurofeedback, which is based on a previous eeg-recording and doesn't respond to the actual brain activity. The fact, that it is not a real neurofeedback, cannot be recognized by the patient nor the trainer because the eeg recording is not visible and the program reacts to muscle contractions (where feedback reactions would be expected) but not to brain activity.
Intervention group
Experimental Intervention: Active-Neurofeedback, 20 sessions
Active-Neurofeedback
The neurofeedback-method used in our study is called "infra-low frequency neurofeedback Training", developed by S. and S. Othmer. NeuroAmpII® is the device and Cygnet® the corresponding Software used for this method, both are approved as an active medicinal device (CE-marked) in the European Union and in USA (www.eeginfo.com). The device and the Software are produced by the Company BEE Medic GmbH, Kirchberg, CH.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Placebo-Neurofeedback
The Intervention used for the control-group consists of a sham-neurofeedback, which is based on a previous eeg-recording and doesn't respond to the actual brain activity. The fact, that it is not a real neurofeedback, cannot be recognized by the patient nor the trainer because the eeg recording is not visible and the program reacts to muscle contractions (where feedback reactions would be expected) but not to brain activity.
Active-Neurofeedback
The neurofeedback-method used in our study is called "infra-low frequency neurofeedback Training", developed by S. and S. Othmer. NeuroAmpII® is the device and Cygnet® the corresponding Software used for this method, both are approved as an active medicinal device (CE-marked) in the European Union and in USA (www.eeginfo.com). The device and the Software are produced by the Company BEE Medic GmbH, Kirchberg, CH.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Time between the injury and inclusion into the study should be 1-6 months
* The participants must be able to perform simple neuropsychologic tests including sufficient vigilance and motor function for pressing a button.
* There is no age limitation. The patients who are hospitalized in the REHAB for a initial rehabilitation have a minimum age of 18 years.
* signed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* severe cognitive deficits, which do not allow understanding of the required neuropsychological tests, e.g. sensory aphasia.
* preexisting dementia
* progressive cerebral diseases e.g. multiple sclerosis, brain tumor
* schizophrenia
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rehab Basel
OTHER
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
OTHER
PD Dr. med. Margret Hund-Georgiadis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
PD Dr. med. Margret Hund-Georgiadis
PD Dr. med.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Margret Hund-Georgiadis, MD, PD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
REHAB Basel, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rehab Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benke T, Karner E, Delazer M. FAB-D: German version of the Frontal Assessment Battery. J Neurol. 2013 Aug;260(8):2066-72. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-6929-8. Epub 2013 May 7.
Gevensleben H, Holl B, Albrecht B, Vogel C, Schlamp D, Kratz O, Studer P, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, Heinrich H. Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;50(7):780-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02033.x. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
Levesque J, Beauregard M, Mensour B. Effect of neurofeedback training on the neural substrates of selective attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Feb 20;394(3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.100. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
May G, Benson R, Balon R, Boutros N. Neurofeedback and traumatic brain injury: a literature review. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;25(4):289-96.
Steiner NJ, Sheldrick RC, Gotthelf D, Perrin EC. Computer-based attention training in the schools for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a preliminary trial. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Jul;50(7):615-22. doi: 10.1177/0009922810397887. Epub 2011 May 10.
Wangler S, Gevensleben H, Albrecht B, Studer P, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, Heinrich H. Neurofeedback in children with ADHD: specific event-related potential findings of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 May;122(5):942-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.036. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Annaheim C, Hug K, Stumm C, Messerli M, Simon Y, Hund-Georgiadis M. Neurofeedback in patients with frontal brain lesions: A randomized, controlled double-blind trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;16:979723. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.979723. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EKNZ 2015-105
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.