Neurofeedback in Patients With Frontal Brain Lesions

NCT ID: NCT02957695

Last Updated: 2017-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this randomized double-blind controlled study we would like to test the benefit of neurofeedback for the recovery of patients with frontal brain injury during an early stage of neurorehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim of the study: Patients with a frontal brain lesion often suffer from deficits in brain functions like attention, concentration, planning, impulse control and emotional stability. In this study the investigators would like to test, whether neurofeedback as a non-medication option can help to improve these cognitive functions. Neurofeedback is a method for optimization and stabilization of the brain activity. The brain continuously gets computer-based information about its state. This information is used by the brain for self-regulation. Because neurofeedback is a process based on learning, the positive effects can be integrated into the daily life and seem to persist also after the training stopped. From the literature, several studies have shown promising results of neurofeedback therapy in patients with brain injuries, but no study so far fulfills the scientific criteria which proves a benefit. Methods: The selection of potential study participants is made by the senior or chief physician. Totally, we include 20 patients with a newly acquired frontal brain lesion. 10 patients receive normal neurofeedback training and 10 patients receive a placebo-neurofeedback in a randomized, double blinded manner. In total, 20 neurofeedback sessions are conducted. At the beginning, after 10 sessions and at the end of the intervention time, a neuropsychological assessment is performed to test the main cognitive functions of the frontal brain. Data analysis: The performance in the neuropsychological testing is the primary outcome. We expect that all participants will gain performance during the course of the study due to natural brain recovery, so that we will focus on the difference of the improvements between the two groups (neurofeedback and placebo-group).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Lesion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Control Intervention: Placebo-Neurofeedback, 20 sessions

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo-Neurofeedback

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Intervention used for the control-group consists of a sham-neurofeedback, which is based on a previous eeg-recording and doesn't respond to the actual brain activity. The fact, that it is not a real neurofeedback, cannot be recognized by the patient nor the trainer because the eeg recording is not visible and the program reacts to muscle contractions (where feedback reactions would be expected) but not to brain activity.

Intervention group

Experimental Intervention: Active-Neurofeedback, 20 sessions

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active-Neurofeedback

Intervention Type DEVICE

The neurofeedback-method used in our study is called "infra-low frequency neurofeedback Training", developed by S. and S. Othmer. NeuroAmpII® is the device and Cygnet® the corresponding Software used for this method, both are approved as an active medicinal device (CE-marked) in the European Union and in USA (www.eeginfo.com). The device and the Software are produced by the Company BEE Medic GmbH, Kirchberg, CH.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo-Neurofeedback

The Intervention used for the control-group consists of a sham-neurofeedback, which is based on a previous eeg-recording and doesn't respond to the actual brain activity. The fact, that it is not a real neurofeedback, cannot be recognized by the patient nor the trainer because the eeg recording is not visible and the program reacts to muscle contractions (where feedback reactions would be expected) but not to brain activity.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Active-Neurofeedback

The neurofeedback-method used in our study is called "infra-low frequency neurofeedback Training", developed by S. and S. Othmer. NeuroAmpII® is the device and Cygnet® the corresponding Software used for this method, both are approved as an active medicinal device (CE-marked) in the European Union and in USA (www.eeginfo.com). The device and the Software are produced by the Company BEE Medic GmbH, Kirchberg, CH.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Middle to severe frontal or frontotemporal brain injury due to accident, bleeding or ischemia, assessed by the Initial Glascow-Coma-Scale from 3 to 12.
* Time between the injury and inclusion into the study should be 1-6 months
* The participants must be able to perform simple neuropsychologic tests including sufficient vigilance and motor function for pressing a button.
* There is no age limitation. The patients who are hospitalized in the REHAB for a initial rehabilitation have a minimum age of 18 years.
* signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* therapy-resistant symptomatic epilepsy
* severe cognitive deficits, which do not allow understanding of the required neuropsychological tests, e.g. sensory aphasia.
* preexisting dementia
* progressive cerebral diseases e.g. multiple sclerosis, brain tumor
* schizophrenia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rehab Basel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

PD Dr. med. Margret Hund-Georgiadis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

PD Dr. med. Margret Hund-Georgiadis

PD Dr. med.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Margret Hund-Georgiadis, MD, PD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

REHAB Basel, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rehab Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Benke T, Karner E, Delazer M. FAB-D: German version of the Frontal Assessment Battery. J Neurol. 2013 Aug;260(8):2066-72. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-6929-8. Epub 2013 May 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23649609 (View on PubMed)

Gevensleben H, Holl B, Albrecht B, Vogel C, Schlamp D, Kratz O, Studer P, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, Heinrich H. Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;50(7):780-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02033.x. Epub 2009 Jan 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19207632 (View on PubMed)

Levesque J, Beauregard M, Mensour B. Effect of neurofeedback training on the neural substrates of selective attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Feb 20;394(3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.100. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16343769 (View on PubMed)

May G, Benson R, Balon R, Boutros N. Neurofeedback and traumatic brain injury: a literature review. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;25(4):289-96.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24199220 (View on PubMed)

Steiner NJ, Sheldrick RC, Gotthelf D, Perrin EC. Computer-based attention training in the schools for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a preliminary trial. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Jul;50(7):615-22. doi: 10.1177/0009922810397887. Epub 2011 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21561933 (View on PubMed)

Wangler S, Gevensleben H, Albrecht B, Studer P, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, Heinrich H. Neurofeedback in children with ADHD: specific event-related potential findings of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 May;122(5):942-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.036. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20843737 (View on PubMed)

Annaheim C, Hug K, Stumm C, Messerli M, Simon Y, Hund-Georgiadis M. Neurofeedback in patients with frontal brain lesions: A randomized, controlled double-blind trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;16:979723. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.979723. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36188178 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EKNZ 2015-105

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neurofeedback in Clinical High Risk
NCT06492343 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Tapfinger Psychomotor Target
NCT02574026 COMPLETED PHASE1