Safety and Performance Study of the ARGOS-IO System in Patients Undergoing Boston Keratoprosthesis Implantation
NCT ID: NCT02945176
Last Updated: 2025-02-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2017-06-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ARGOS-IO system in patients undergoing concomitant implantation of a BKPro and an ARGOS-IO sensor over the 12 month period beginning at implantation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Safety and Performance of the ARGOS-IO Intraocular Pressure Sensor System in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
NCT03651336
Performance and Safety of the ARGOS-SC Suprachoroidal Pressure Sensor in Patients With Glaucoma Undergoing Non-penetrating Glaucoma Surgery
NCT03756662
Safety and Performance Study of the ARGOS-IO (Intraocular) System in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
NCT02434692
Long-term Safety and Performance of the ARGOS-SC Suprachoroidal Pressure Sensor System in Patients With Glaucoma Underwent Non-penetrating Glaucoma Surgery
NCT04773106
The Role of Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients Undergoing a Boston Keratoprosthesis
NCT04232982
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ARGOS-IO system
The ARGOS-IO system is a non-European Community (CE) marked investigational medical device composed of the implant and its accessories.
Implant: ARGOS-IO pressure sensor implant for sulcus placement or transcleral fixation
Accessories: MESOGRAPH reading device, Implant Injector
ARGOS-IO system
This study will enroll a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 15 patients. It is anticipated to be large enough to provide an initial estimate of common safety events and assessment of performance. Any adverse event (AE), serious adverse event (SAE), ADE (adverse device event) and SADE (serious adverse device event) will be listed. Incidence will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval (Pearson-Clopper, two-sided). The Bland-Altman method will be used to assess the limits of agreement between the IOP measurements ARGOS-IO and surgical manometry. When appropriate, two-sided 95% confidence intervals, for these limits will be calculated accounting for repeated measurements based on the method proposed by Zou (2011). Other secondary performance endpoints will be analyzed by descriptive and explorative statistical methods.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ARGOS-IO system
This study will enroll a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 15 patients. It is anticipated to be large enough to provide an initial estimate of common safety events and assessment of performance. Any adverse event (AE), serious adverse event (SAE), ADE (adverse device event) and SADE (serious adverse device event) will be listed. Incidence will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval (Pearson-Clopper, two-sided). The Bland-Altman method will be used to assess the limits of agreement between the IOP measurements ARGOS-IO and surgical manometry. When appropriate, two-sided 95% confidence intervals, for these limits will be calculated accounting for repeated measurements based on the method proposed by Zou (2011). Other secondary performance endpoints will be analyzed by descriptive and explorative statistical methods.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Keratoprosthesis surgery indicated, defined as having a severely opaque and vascularized cornea AND either a verifiable history of two or more prior failed corneal transplant procedures or a medical condition such as alkali burns or autoimmune disease that makes the success of a traditional corneal transplant procedure unlikely. Potential study subjects will be solicited for participation in the clinical trial only after they have consented to the keratoprosthesis operation.
3. Axial length \> 21 mm
4. Ability and willingness to attend all scheduled visits and comply with all study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
2. Current retinal detachment
3. Connective tissue diseases
4. History or evidence of severe inflammatory eye diseases (i.e. uveitis, retinitis, scleritis) in one or both eyes within 6 months prior to ARGOS-IO implantation
5. History of ocular or periocular malignancy
6. History of extensive keloid formation
7. Any known intolerance or hypersensitivity to topical anesthetics, mydriatics, or silicone (component of the device)
8. Presence of another active medical eye implant and/or other active medical implants in the head/neck region
9. Signs of current infection, including fever and current treatment with antibiotics
10. Severe generalized disease that results in a life expectancy shorter than a year
11. Any clinical evidence that the investigator feels would place the subject at increased risk with the placement of the device
12. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
13. Participation in any study involving an investigational drug or device within the past 30 days or ongoing participation in a study with an investigational drug or device
14. Intraoperative complication that would preclude implantation of the study device
15. Subject and/or an immediate family member is an employee of the investigational site directly affiliated with this study, the sponsor or the contract research organization.
Previous or concurrent enrollment of the contralateral eye in this clinical study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Implandata Ophthalmic Products GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Neuhann, Prof. MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MVZ Prof. Neuhann
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität zu Köln
Cologne, , Germany
MVZ Prof. Neuhann
Munich, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis Surgery Using the Eyemate-IO Sensor: Dynamics in the First Year
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIV-14-09-012725
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ARGOS-KP01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.