A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients

NCT ID: NCT02935803

Last Updated: 2016-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An increasing number of specific procedures have been described for the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and concomitant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The investigators introduced an alternative operative method for POP-Q II-III repair and anti-incontinence with the trans vaginal mesh (TVM) anterior edge fixed to the periurethral tissues at the level of mid-urethra. The efficacy and short- and long-term complication profile, of this new surgical technique as compared with those of non-modified TVM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prospective randomized double blind study comprised 152 women who presented for the correction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in conjunction with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse stage II-III (POP-Q II-III) at the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Szeged, Hungary, between June of 2016 and June 2017. After a block randomization method, the patients will divide into two arms, the study group which consist of 76 patients will undergo modified trans vaginal mesh operation (TVM), the rest 76 patients as a control group will undergo a traditional TVM operation. Inclusion criteria in the study is coexisting SUI and POP Q St II-III and signature of the informed consent. The exclusion criteria are as follows: urge, mixed or neurogenic incontinence, occult SUI, previous mesh operations, anti-depressive medical therapy, cancer of the pelvic organs, urinary infections, any sign of voiding difficulties. The transobturator TVM operation (Sergent et al.) has been modofied by inserting a stabilizing suture, which fixing the anterior edge of the mesh to the para-urethral tissues at the level of the mid-urethra with two non-resolvable anchoring stitches thereby promoting the proper elevation and closure of the urethra. The hypothesis is the stabilizing suture treat the coexisting SUI as well. In all cases, urodynamic examinations were carried out before the surgery and urodynamic examinations comprising uroflowmetry, cystography and Valsalva leak point pressure tests and pelvic floor ultrasonography will be performed to determine the coexisting SUI. The efficacy of the POP repair is taken as a significant (\>1 cm) improvement at points Aa, Ba, C and D according to the POP-Q system (International Continence Society) during the follow-up. The anti-incontinence efficacy is classified as no further SUI diagnosed by urodynamic examination and pelvic floor sonography. All patients will fill two validated Hungarian language questionnaires as "A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire" (PISQ-12) and "Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory" PFDI. After a one-year application phase all patients will be followed for 36 months. During follow- up phase repeated urodynamic studies, pelvic floor sonography urine culturing will be done after 3, 12, 24 and 36 months. The evaluation of the POP-Q system and Bonney's cough test and the PISQ-12 and PFDI questionnaires will be performed at every regular check-ups

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Prolapse Urinary Stress Incontinence Side Effects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Modified TVM operation

Modified Trans-vaginal Mesh operation (mTVM): polypropylene monofilament meshes produced by Aspide® fixed up to the mid urethra by a resolvable suture. 76 participants will be involved.

Group Type OTHER

Trans-vaginal Mesh operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Modified the transobturator TVM operation reported by Sergent et al. by inserting a stabilizing suture, which fixing the anterior edge of the mesh to the paraurethral tissues at the level of the mid-urethra with two non-resolvable anchoring stitches thereby promoting the proper elevation and closure of the urethra

Control group

76 Participants as control group undergo a traditional Trans-vaginal Mesh operation (TVM) with polypropylene monofilament meshes produced by Aspide® . (Sergent et al.)

Group Type OTHER

Trans-vaginal Mesh operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Modified the transobturator TVM operation reported by Sergent et al. by inserting a stabilizing suture, which fixing the anterior edge of the mesh to the paraurethral tissues at the level of the mid-urethra with two non-resolvable anchoring stitches thereby promoting the proper elevation and closure of the urethra

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trans-vaginal Mesh operation

Modified the transobturator TVM operation reported by Sergent et al. by inserting a stabilizing suture, which fixing the anterior edge of the mesh to the paraurethral tissues at the level of the mid-urethra with two non-resolvable anchoring stitches thereby promoting the proper elevation and closure of the urethra

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Coexisting SUI and POP Q St II-III and signature of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Urge, mixed or neurogenic incontinency, occult SUI, previous mesh operations, antidepressive medical therapy, cancer of the pelvic organs, urinary infections, any sign of voiding difficulties
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Szeged University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zoltan Fekete

assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zoltan Fekete, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Szeged University

Gábor Németh, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Szeged University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univ. of Szeged. Dep. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hungary

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zoltán Fekete, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

36209724158

Gábor Németh, M.D., PhD

Role: CONTACT

3662545499

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fekete Zoltan, M.D.

Role: primary

209724158

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood GC. Urinary incontinence in women: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):324-31. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000267220.48987.17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18238969 (View on PubMed)

Kirss F, Lang K, Toompere K, Veerus P. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among Estonian postmenopausal women. Springerplus. 2013 Oct 17;2:524. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-524. eCollection 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24171152 (View on PubMed)

Akkus Y, Pinar G. Evaluation of the prevalence, type, severity, and risk factors of urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life among women in Turkey. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):887-93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2904-5. Epub 2015 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26638154 (View on PubMed)

Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Rahimi S, Negro R, Vergara D, Martignago R, Pellegrino M, Cavallotti C. Age-related pelvic floor modifications and prolapse risk factors in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):204-12. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181b0c2ae.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19629013 (View on PubMed)

Molander U, Milsom I, Ekelund P, Mellstrom D. An epidemiological study of urinary incontinence and related urogenital symptoms in elderly women. Maturitas. 1990 Apr;12(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(90)90060-j.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2333037 (View on PubMed)

Lau HH, Huang WC, Cheng YW, Wang H, Su TH. Changes in urodynamic measurements and bladder neck position after single-incision trans-vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1629-35. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2753-2. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26156205 (View on PubMed)

Sergent F, Gay-Crosier G, Bisson V, Resch B, Verspyck E, Marpeau L. Ineffectiveness of associating a suburethral tape to a transobturator mesh for cystocele correction on concomitant stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2009 Oct;74(4):765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.038. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19643459 (View on PubMed)

Fekete Z, Suranyi A, Renes L, Nemeth G, Kozinszky Z. Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29282115 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.aspide.com/en/gynecological-urological-surgery/p/surgimesh-prolapse

Surge-Mesh Prolapse by Aspide is used for both TVM method

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TVM/mTVM 55/2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.