Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
192 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-15
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving the Stewardship of Diagnostic Imaging Resources in Alberta Emergency Departments
NCT02410941
Learning Retention in Radiograph Interpretation
NCT03370900
Application of Mobile DR in the Diagnosis of Bone Trauma in High Cold Environment
NCT05440435
Effect of Snapshot Freeze on Cardiac CT Image Quality
NCT02618473
Flavoring Oral Contrast for MR Enterography
NCT02617576
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Physicians will be provided a semi-annual (every 6 months) report card outlining the number of CT scans, ultrasounds and plain x-rays they ordered per 100 patients for whom they were the primary provider. We will assume that the primary provider is the most frequent biller of primary care services. Participants will receive a link to the report card via email from the Newfoundland and Labrador Medical Association (NLMA) by a two-step process: The initial email gives a brief description of the report and contains a link which then redirects the clinician to a secure web page that displays the individual clinician diagnostic imaging utilization in a prior one year period compared to the aggregate of their peers in the same region. Physicians in the detailing groups will be contacted to arrange a single in-person session with one of their colleagues to discuss the detailing reports.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual QCNL report group
Physicians receive the usual Quality of Care Newfoundland and Labrador utilization report: This reports ranks the physician on a figure of their peers according to the total number of tests ordered in a one-year period.
Usual QCNL DI utilization report
See arm descriptions.
Usual QCNL report plus detailing.
This group receives the usual QCNL report described above. Shortly after the reports are sent, this group will be contacted at least three times to attempt to arrange a single in-person detailing session.
Usual QCNL DI utilization report
See arm descriptions.
Detailing
In-person detailing, usually with a small group of family physicians and a peer (physician) facilitator to discuss the topic over a 30-60 minute period.
New utilization report
This group will receive a new type of report that shows individual physician ordering per 100 patients compared to the mean of all physicians, adjusted for patient complexity (age, sex, comorbidity, education, income, rurality).
New DI utilization report
See arm descriptions.
New utilization report plus detailing
New type of report plus detailing as described above.
New DI utilization report
See arm descriptions.
Detailing
In-person detailing, usually with a small group of family physicians and a peer (physician) facilitator to discuss the topic over a 30-60 minute period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Usual QCNL DI utilization report
See arm descriptions.
New DI utilization report
See arm descriptions.
Detailing
In-person detailing, usually with a small group of family physicians and a peer (physician) facilitator to discuss the topic over a 30-60 minute period.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NL SUPPORT Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research
UNKNOWN
Memorial University of Newfoundland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kris Aubrey-Bassler
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kris Aubrey-Bassler, MD, CCFP(EM)
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Health Sciences Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mittal MK, Zorc JJ, Garcia-Espana JF, Shaw KN. An assessment of clinical performance measures for pediatric emergency physicians. Am J Med Qual. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):33-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860612443849. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
Jain S, Elon LK, Johnson BA, Frank G, Deguzman M. Physician practice variation in the pediatric emergency department and its impact on resource use and quality of care. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Dec;26(12):902-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181fe9108.
Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Beroes JM, Ewing BA, Shekelle PG. Electronic health record-based interventions for improving appropriate diagnostic imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 21;162(8):557-65. doi: 10.7326/M14-2600.
Jain S, Frank G, McCormick K, Wu B, Johnson BA. Impact of Physician Scorecards on Emergency Department Resource Use, Quality, and Efficiency. Pediatrics. 2015 Sep;136(3):e670-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2363. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
Schwappach DL, Blaudszun A, Conen D, Ebner H, Eichler K, Hochreutener MA. 'Emerge': Benchmarking of clinical performance and patients' experiences with emergency care in Switzerland. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec;15(6):473-85. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg078.
Campbell SM, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0807651.
Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 12;357(2):181-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr065990. No abstract available.
Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A; "Psychological Theory" Group. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
Klabunde CN, Harlan LC, Warren JL. Data sources for measuring comorbidity: a comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients. Med Care. 2006 Oct;44(10):921-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000223480.52713.b9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NLSUPPORT-Aubrey
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.