Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2019-01-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is a pilot study to investigate whether Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) combined with best (drug) treatment as usual (TAU) leads to clinically significant pain relief in patients suffering from pain in the lower limbs due to SFN, defined as ≥30% pain reduction on a mean NRS during daytime, and/or ≥30% pain reduction on a mean NRS during night-time, and/or at least much improved or very much improved, on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for pain and sleep.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autofluorescent Flavoprotein Imaging of Intraepidermal Nerve Fibers: a Pilot Study
NCT02537951
Comparative Study in Patients With Refractory Chronic Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain and/or Back Neuropathic Pain.
NCT04852107
SCS for Patient With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy and Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT06480786
Safety and Tolerability Study of ST-503 for Refractory Pain Due to Peripheral Neuropathy (Small Fiber Predominant, SFN)
NCT06980948
Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain
NCT01486108
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
SFN can cause severe and chronic symptoms such as burning pain in particularly the extremities in combination with autonomic symptoms, with a significant impact on quality of life. Moreover, neuropathic pain disorders are associated with anxiety, depression and sleep disturbances, polypharmacy and significant healthcare resource use. Therefore, neuropathic pain has a significant impact on society due to the high socioeconomic costs. The treatment of SFN still largely relies on the agents generally used for neuropathic pain relief, particularly derived from diabetic painful neuropathic studies, such as antidepressants (amitriptyline, duloxetine), anti-epileptic agents (pregabalin, gabapentin), opioids and topical agents (lidocain and capsaicin), but have been disappointing in SFN (clinical observation in \> 400 patients treated). Therefore it is of major importance to develop new treatment options that can provide sufficient pain relief for the individual patient.
In 1965 Melzack and Wall introduced the gate theory of pain perception. This theory offered new perspectives in treating neuropathic pain. In the seventies SCS was introduced. It was thought that the stimulation of the large myelinated fibres modulates the transmission of pain signals, which run through small, non-myelinated fibres. The exact mechanism of SCS is still unknown. Nowadays SCS is used worldwide and the global sales are estimated for more than 35.000 systems annually. Recently, a prospective two-centre randomized controlled trial was performed to investigate the effect of SCS in painful diabetic polyneuropathy. SCS was successful in 59% of the patients, and the effect lasted for at least 2.5 years in most patients.
The current pilot study will focus on the potential effect of SCS in patients with SFN. The main study parameter will be the mean pain intensity as measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and/or a Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for pain and sleep measured on a 7-point Likert scale, after 12 months of treatment in patients with SFN and intractable neuropathic pain in the lower limbs. Besides the primary objective, the following secondary aims are investigated:
1. The effect of SCS on pain (at least 30% pain reduction, on mean daily, night, and maximum pain);
2. the effect of SCS on activity and participation;
3. the effect of SCS on and health related quality of life;
4. the effect of SCS on mood in SFN;
5. the effect of SCS on the reduction of pain medication.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal cord stimulation
implantation of spinal cord stimulator
Spinal cord stimulation
implantation of spinal cord stimulator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spinal cord stimulation
implantation of spinal cord stimulator
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 75 years, lucid,
* Mean pain intensity during daytime or night-time should be 5 or higher on the 11-points numeric rating scale (NRS),
* The pain intended to treat has been present for more than 12 months, as declared by patients to the best of their knowledge or after studying available medical records,
* Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects) with drugs from the following drug categories
* Tricyclic anti-depressant agent (e.g., Amitriptyline)
* Alpha 2-delta calcium channel agonist/Anti-epileptic drugs (e.g. Pregabalin (Lyrica) or Gabapentin (Neurontin)),
* Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g., Duloxetine (Cymbalta)),
* Tramadol or strong opioids.
* Patients will have to be treated or have been treated with at least 3 drugs from the above mentioned drug categories according to the EFNS guidelines for neuropathic pain \[34\]. Starting dosage is based on individual patient characteristics. Each drug has to be tried for at least 3 weeks and dose will have to be raised once, if possible. Drug treatment can be stopped due to insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable adverse events.
* Patients will have to be in steady state in medication use for at least 2 months prior to inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neuropathic pain prevalent in the upper limbs (UL) compared to the legs; UL NRS not exceeding 3)
* Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than SFN (NRS \> 3),
* Addiction: drugs, alcohol (5E / day) and/or specific medication
* Drugs: cocaine, heroin, marihuana,
* Alcohol: wine, beer, liquor,
* Medication: benzodiazepines.
* Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication problems),
* Blood clotting disorder or the use of oral anticoagulation that cannot be stopped for a period of 10 days around the implantation procedure.
* Immune deficiency (HIV-positive if known, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to \> prednisolone 10 mg, immunosuppressive medication, etc.)
* Known peripheral vascular disease, no palpable peripheral pulsations at the feet (inclusion is possible if pulsations are absent, but ankle/brachial index is between 0.7 and 1.2 in both feet)
* Life expectancy \< 1 year
* Pacemaker
* Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision
* Other clinically significant or unstable, or severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric/psychological condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or procedure or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
* Pregnancy
* Severe cardiac or pulmonary failure (\> NYHA classification II)
* Use of opioids (higher dose than an equivalent of 30 mg morphine a day)
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Catharina G. Faber
Professor, MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL53831.06.15/ METC152054
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SFN-SCS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.