Novel Treatment Option for Neuropathic Pain

NCT ID: NCT02490436

Last Updated: 2016-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the EGFR-inhibitor cetuximab is better than placebo for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuralgia Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A: active drug first

Cetuximab in treatment period 1, placebo in treatment period 2, and open-label cetuximab in treatment period 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cetuximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

B: placebo first

Placebo in treatment period 1, cetuximab in treatment period 2, and open-label cetuximab in treatment period 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cetuximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cetuximab

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Randomized cross-over between cetuximab and placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Erbitux

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent and anticipated compliance.
* Pain defined as "definite" neuropathic pain, according to the Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain guidelines or defined as "probable" NP, according to the guidelines, if the confirmatory test was a positive diagnostic test. Complex regional pain syndrome can be included despite lack of an offending lesion, as long as the "Budapest criteria" are fulfilled
* Neuropathic Pain associated with compressive nerve states (including failed surgery) or CRPS (according to the "Budapest criteria")
* PainDETECT score of at least 13 with average pain intensity of at least 6 /10 over the last four weeks. In addition, a painDETECT pattern indicating that the underlying neuropathic pain is constantly present.
* Worst pain intensity higher than 6 for five of seven days during the screening phase, according to Brif Pain Inventory.
* The patient should be able to distinguish between the neuropathic pain and other pain conditions, including elements of nociceptive pain caused by the same disease process.
* Neuropathic pain duration of between six and thirty months, deemed chronic and likely to be irreversible by clinical history and findings.
* No new or increased neuropathic pain treatment for the last four weeks.
* Standard medical treatments for the patients' underlying condition or neuropathic pain must have been considered or tried and must, according to the opinion of the referring or a consulted pain specialist, be judged to be inappropriate or of insufficient potential efficacy.
* Referring physician agreement to follow up the patient after study completion according to the best possible and available pain treatment and care.
* Women of childbearing potential and men must use an acceptable method of contraception throughout the study, and for 30 days after the last study drug administration.
* Negative pregnancy test within 7 days before each treatment period where appropriate.
* White blood cell count ≥ 3 × 109 with neutrophils ≥ 1.5 × 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L and hemoglobin ≥ 6.21 mmol/L (10 g/dL). Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of reference range and AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of reference range within the last 28 days before inclusion.
* Aged 18 or above

Exclusion Criteria

* Neuropathic pain origin in the central nervous system.
* Phantom limb pain or a significant component of nociceptive pain.
* Ascending distal small fiber peripheral neuropathy.
* Patients primarily experiencing pain 'attacks', i.e. pattern of neuropathic pain depicted in picture 3 of the painDETECT.
* Other pain state that may interfere with evaluation of the studied neuropathic pain condition.
* Any underlying medical or psychiatric condition, clinical disorder or laboratory finding, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study objectives.
* Uncontrolled or unstable diabetes.
* Severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure NYHA III or IV), unstable angina pectoris, history of myocardial infarction within the last twelve months, significant arrhythmias
* Severe cerebrovascular disease during the six months prior to inclusion.
* Active and ongoing eye and skin disorders or newly diagnosed gastric ulcer that may interfere with the study treatment.
* History of allergic reaction to any of the study treatment components, red meat or tick bites.
* Previous treatment with any EGFR-pathway inhibitor.
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
* Participation in another clinical trial within the past 90 days.
* Use of any investigational agent within 90 days prior to day 1 of study drug.
* Known drug abuse/alcohol abuse, legal incapacity or limited legal capacity or any other reason that, in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from participating.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sorlandet Hospital HF

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Kersten, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Center for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Cancer Treatment, Sorlandet Hospital HF

Kristiansand, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kersten C, Cameron MG, Bailey AG, Fallon MT, Laird BJ, Paterson V, Mitchell R, Fleetwood-Walker SM, Daly F, Mjaland S. Relief of Neuropathic Pain Through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition: A Randomized Proof-of-Concept Trial. Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2495-2505. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz101.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31106835 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-001195-21

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015/618/REK sør-øst D

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SFK3 / 062202_281

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id