Bilateral Pallidal Stimulation in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease-LATESTIM

NCT ID: NCT02823158

Last Updated: 2019-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for advanced complicated Parkinson's disease (PD). Several controlled randomized studies have given proof of an advantage for operated patients as compared to medically treated patients in terms of motor outcome, activities of daily living and health status. However these studies have addressed mostly stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). GPi stimulation has not been compared to best medical treatment (BMT) in a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with complicated PD who are not good candidates for STN stimulation. The investigators aim assessing GPi-DBS in patients with PD who have contraindications for STN-DBS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The indication and excellent therapeutic effects of STN stimulation have been sufficiently proven in advanced PD, and the contraindications for this treatment are rather well established. Also, the observation that patients fulfilling the "STN-profile" but who had been operated for pallidal DBS and lost part of the treatment's benefit over time, improved when stimulated later in the STN (instead of the GPi) shows that patients qualifying for STN-DBS do not have as good a result with GPi-DBS.

GPi stimulation may be used in patients who do not qualify for STN stimulation. Especially postural instability, age over 70 years, and mild to moderate cognitive deficits are commonly considered to be exclusion criteria for STN stimulation but not for GPi stimulation. Therefore, the investigators propose a prospective randomized controlled trial of GPi stimulation in patients with PD and motor complications who have relative or absolute contraindications for STN stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Central Nervous System Disease Basal Ganglia Disease Movement Disorders Neurodegenerative Disorders Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GPi DBS and best medical treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of Globus Pallidus internus (GPi) and Best medical treatment (BMT)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in the GPi group will be implanted with DBS-electrodes within 6 weeks after randomisation. The stimulation parameters and the medical treatment are adjusted for optimal control of motor and non-motor signs and symptoms according to published guidelines using a specified algorithm. The stimulation parameters are recorded at the beginning and at the end of each post-surgical assessment.

Best medical treatment is applied in combination with GPi-DBS.

Best medical treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive optimized medical treatment according to published evidence based guidelines.

Best medical treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Best medical treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive optimized medical treatment according to published evidence based guidelines.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of Globus Pallidus internus (GPi) and Best medical treatment (BMT)

Patients in the GPi group will be implanted with DBS-electrodes within 6 weeks after randomisation. The stimulation parameters and the medical treatment are adjusted for optimal control of motor and non-motor signs and symptoms according to published guidelines using a specified algorithm. The stimulation parameters are recorded at the beginning and at the end of each post-surgical assessment.

Best medical treatment is applied in combination with GPi-DBS.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Best medical treatment

Patients will receive optimized medical treatment according to published evidence based guidelines.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bilateral pallidal stimulation Deep brain stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Parkinson's disease according to the UKBB criteria, with the exception that familial forms of otherwise typical parkinsonian syndromes may also be included
* motor complications of dopaminergic medication (dyskinesia or motor fluctuations or both) that are at least moderately bothersome to the patient \[on a scale of 5 possible levels: not at all / mildly / moderately / severely / extremely bothersome\]

Exclusion Criteria

* Mattis dementia rating scale \<130 points
* postural instability of \>1 in the item of MDS-UPDRS III \[item #12\] "on" medication
* less than 30% improvement of axial score in the acute levodopa challenge test \[axial score =sum of items 3.1, 3.9, 3.10, 3.12, 3.13 of the MDS UPDRS III\]

* age \> 70 years
* Mattis dementia rating scale \<134 points
* gait freezing "on" medication
* dysarthria of \> 2 in the item of the MDS-UPDRS III \[item #3.1\]
* less than 50% improvement of axial score in the acute levodopa challenge test \[axial score = sum of items 3.1, 3.9, 3.10, 3.12, 3.13 of the MDS UPDRS III\]
* Starkstein apathy score of ≥14
* Complete baseline PDQ-39-SI and patient diary available
* written informed consent


* Age \> 85 years
* surgical or medical contraindications
* abnormalities on brain MRI that preclude the implantation of electrodes into the GPi
* contraindication for 3T MRI (baseline imaging)
* severe medical illness that is likely to hamper the benefit of DBS
* severe personality disorder that may interfere with optimization of DBS
* dementia according to DSM-V and MMSE \< 20
* ongoing psychosis (except pseudohallucinations)
* ongoing major depression (BDI-II \> 23) or depression of any severity with suicidal ideation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Schüpbach, PD Dr. med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inselspital University Hospital Bern

Ines Debove, Dr. med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inselspital University Hospital Bern

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inselspital University Hospital Bern

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-000334

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.