Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Secondary Dystonia in Children and Young Adults

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-03

Study Completion Date

2019-07-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dystonia is a movement disorder seen in both children and adults that is characterized by "sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal, often repetitive, movements, postures, or both." Secondary dystonia is far more common in pediatric populations than primary dystonia, and far more recalcitrant to standard pharmacologic and surgical treatments including Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). There exists a large unmet need to develop new therapeutics, treatment strategies, and outcome measures for pediatric secondary dystonia.

The investigators are proposing to investigate the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus (Vop) of the thalamus as a new target for DBS in secondary dystonia. Prior to the development of DBS, the main surgical treatment of dystonia was thalamotomy. Although there were many different targets in the thalamus, often done in staged procedures, the most common and successful targeted nuclei was the Vop, which is traditionally thought to be the pallidal receiving area. Previous lesioning of Vop produced improvements in dystonia but intolerable side effects, especially when implanted bilaterally. However, given that secondary dystonia patients were often reported to have superior results to primary dystonia it is reasonable to believe that if the side effects can be modulated, that targeting of the Vop nucleus with DBS could be a viable alternative to Globus Pallidus interna (GPi). Given that Deep Brain Stimulation is a treatment that is inherently adjustable, it is conceivable that settings on the Deep Brain Stimulation could be adjusted to allow for clinical benefit with minimal side effects. Indeed, there have been several scattered successful case reports attesting to this possibility.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Dystonia

NCT00773604

Dystonia

COMPLETED NA

Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Movement Disorders

NCT02119611

Parkinson's Disease

RECRUITING NA

The Motor Network in Parkinson's Disease and Dystonia: Mechanisms of Therapy

NCT03582891

Parkinson Disease Dystonia

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Stimulation of the Dentate Nucleus of the Cerebellum for the Treatment of Refractory Spasticity With or Without Dystonia

NCT07231302

Ataxia - Other Dystonia Disorder Tremor, Essential +2 more

COMPLETED

Deep Brain Stimulation in Treating Patients With Dystonia

NCT00004421

Dystonia

COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dystonia is a movement disorder seen in both children and adults that is characterized by "sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal, often repetitive, movements, postures, or both." Secondary dystonia has evolved to refer to dystonia resulting from damage to the nervous system or degenerative disease processes. While primary dystonia is generally thought to arise from genetic causes, secondary dystonias have a variety of causes including perinatal injuries (cerebral palsy), central nervous system infections, traumatic brain injuries, and many different metabolic, neurodegenerative, and mitochondrial conditions. Secondary dystonia is far more common in pediatric populations than primary dystonia, and far more recalcitrant to standard pharmacologic and surgical treatments including Deep Brain Stimulation. Given that most treatments for dystonia are developed for primary dystonia and then applied to secondary dystonia, it is not surprising that this effectiveness gap exists. Thus, there exists a large unmet need to develop new therapeutics, treatment strategies, and outcome measures for pediatric secondary dystonia.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is one such therapeutic intervention that has potential to improve secondary dystonia. DBS is a surgical treatment for several different movement disorders that evolved from functional stereotactic neurosurgery techniques initially used to lesion specific deep brain structures. While Essential Tremor and Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease have predictable and consistent response rates to DBS in carefully selected patients, response rates of dystonia have been much more inconsistent. One predictor of success has been the presence of DYT-1 mutation, the most common known genetic cause of primary dystonia. Success rates in DYT-1 dystonia are consistently high with reductions in dystonia typically greater than 80%. However, the results in secondary dystonia have been much more modest and inconsistent. A recent meta-analysis found that on average, dystonia symptoms as measured by common rating scales improve 23% following DBS for dystonic cerebral palsy (the most common cause of secondary dystonia), however there are frequent cases of non-responders. Additionally, there have been very few examination, radiological or laboratory predictors of good response to DBS, except for genetic confirmation of DYT-119. However, across both primary and secondary dystonia, younger age at the time of surgery (less than 21 years old) and shorter duration of symptoms (less than 15 years) have been shown to be the most likely predictive factors for a good postoperative outcome. This has led many to suggest that DBS should be offered earlier in the course of intractable dystonia, prior to the development of permanent complications such as orthopedic contractures. Thus, we are setting an upper age limit of 25 to account for the concern that earlier implantation leads to improved outcomes. The lower age limit of 7 reflects the fact that the current humanitarian exemption for DBS for dystonia currently goes down to age 7. Thus, there exists a need to both improve patient selection as well as application of DBS for secondary dystonia in children.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dystonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DBS active

All participants will be enrolled in DBS placement and active stimulation. The following components will be used:

* Activa PC Primary Cell Neurostimulator - (Model 37601)
* Activa RC Rechargeable Neurostimulator - (Model 37612)
* Activa SC Single Cell Neurostimulator (Models 37602 and 37603)
* DBS Lead - (Model 3387)
* DBS Extension - (Models 37085/6)
* Patient Programmer - (Model 37642)
* Test Stimulator - (Model 3625)
* N'Vision Clinician Programmer - (Model 8840)
* N'Vision Software Application Card - (Model 8870)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL