Alteration of Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters for Dystonia
NCT ID: NCT00971854
Last Updated: 2009-10-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-30
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Globus pallidus stimulation can be very effective therapy for dystonia. However not all patients are equally responsive and therapeutic outcomes can be frustratingly variable. The reason for this variability is unclear. Such variability in response may need to be met by tailoring stimulation to individual patients.
Another issue with deep brain stimulation is battery life. Eventually, batteries become depleted and need to be replaced. Such battery replacements require an operation, hospital stay and the risk of introducing infection. The high electrical energy that has been used to treat dystonia means that batteries are typically replaced every year or two.
The artificial electrical signals of deep brain stimulation are delivered with three parameters; frequency (Hertz - Hz), voltage (volts) and pulse width (microseconds). It has recently been reported that lower frequency stimulation, at 60Hz rather than 130Hz, can be used effectively to treat dystonia. Such 60Hz stimulation may be more effective for some patients than others. The lower energy demands of 60Hz stimulation would also greatly improve battery life (potentially doubling battery life).
The aim of this study is to assess if 60Hz stimulation is more effective in ameliorating the dystonia of patients who have responded poorly to 130Hz pallidal stimulation. The current status of the evidence is one of clinical equipoise (uncertainty) and therefore suits a double blinded randomised trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Dystonia
NCT00773604
Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Cervical Dystonia
NCT00132340
Novel Stimulation Patterns for the Treatment of Dystonia
NCT02468843
Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Movement Disorders
NCT02119611
Deep Brain Stimulation Effects in Dystonia
NCT04568681
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
60 Hz stimulation
Experimental reduced frequency pallidal stimulation
Alteration of deep brain stimulator settings
From 130Hz to 60Hz pallidal stimulation
130 Hz stimulation
Current standard pallidal stimulation setting
Alteration of deep brain stimulator settings
From 130Hz to 60Hz pallidal stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Alteration of deep brain stimulator settings
From 130Hz to 60Hz pallidal stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to understand study requirements - able to provide consent.
* Relevant dystonia rating scales: Cervical dystonia - severity subsection of the Toronto Western Hospital spasmodic torticollis rating scale; Generalised dystonia - severity section of the Burke Fahn Marsden rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oxford
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Oxford
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tipu Aziz, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgery
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R&D Study - 5898
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
09/H0603/11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.