Use of Interventional MRI for Implantation of Deep Brain Stimulator Electrodes
NCT ID: NCT00792532
Last Updated: 2019-12-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
8 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2003-07-31
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goal of this project is to gather observational data on the iMRI DBS implantation technique and clinical outcomes. This already FDA-approved implantation technique for DBS will take place entirely within the Phillips 1.5T and a Siemens 3T open magnet MRI machine. Prior to study initiation, instrumentation and MR protocols were tested using a phantom head. In the proposed project, subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus DBS implantations will be performed bilaterally in patients with Parkinson's disease or dystonia. Patients will be under general anesthesia. Targeting and lead verification are performed with imaging alone, without physiologic mapping. Data is to be gathered on the following: operative time, degree of benefit with bilateral implantation (changes in standard rating scales of motor disability), DBS voltage requirements, complications), and electrode location by MR. These measures will be compared with our historical controls, previously entered into our research database, in which electrodes were placed by the standard methods. We expect that the use of near real time MR will improve the speed and accuracy of DBS implantation, and eliminate the need for invasive physiological monitoring.
All of the study participants will be getting iMRI DBS implantation as a part of their standard of care and agree to have additional study data collected
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
iMRI
interventional MRI for implantation of DBS electrodes
DBS implantation will be performed entirely within a Phillips 3T MRI scanner
DBS electrodes
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
interventional MRI for implantation of DBS electrodes
DBS implantation will be performed entirely within a Phillips 3T MRI scanner
DBS electrodes
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Approximately 5 years' duration, relative to the date of surgery, since diagnosis of PD.
3. Age \>20 inclusive, on date of surgery.
4. The subject is ambulatory in their best on time (not wheelchair bound).
5. The subject is medically able to undergo the surgery as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations and any other evaluations that are part of the standard practice at the institution in which the subject is to undergo surgery (e.g., subjects will have normal coagulation tests and normal platelet levels).
6. The subject is expected to be able to comply with and understand the required visit schedule and all required tests and procedures.
7. Signed IRB-approved informed consent is obtained before any study-specific procedure, including assessments required during the eligibility evaluation period.
1. Dystonia diagnosed by a movement disorders neurologist
2. Significant functional impairment despite optimal medical management, including failed botulinum toxin therapy if appropriate
3. Age \>20 years inclusive, on date of surgery.
4. The subject is medically able to undergo the surgery as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations and any other evaluations that are part of the standard practice at the institution in which the subject is to undergo surgery (e.g., subjects will have normal coagulation tests and normal platelet levels).
5. The subject is able to comply with and understand the required visit schedule and all required tests and procedures.
6. Signed IRB-approved informed consent is obtained before any study-specific procedure, including assessments required during the eligibility evaluation period.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of treatment of PD by any procedure involving intracranial surgery or implantation of a device.
3. MRI of the brain within 12 months before the surgery which demonstrates an intracranial abnormality that would contraindicate surgery (e.g. stroke, tumor, vascular abnormality affecting the DBS target area).
4. Any disorder that precludes a surgical procedure (e.g., signs of sepsis or inadequately treated infection) or alters wound healing.
5. Receipt of antiplatelet agents for at least 10 days prior surgery.
6. Significant cognitive impairment based on investigator assessment during the eligibility evaluation period.
7. History of significant psychiatric illness, epilepsy, or Alzheimer's disease.
8. Active drug or alcohol abuse.
9. Pregnancy or lack of effective contraception in women of childbearing potential defined as one year post-menopausal or surgically sterile.
10. Treatment with non anti-Parkinsonian agents (e.g., atypical neuroleptics) that may affect symptoms of PD within 60 days before entering the study.
11. Any medical disability (e.g., severe degenerative arthritis, compromised nutritional state, severe peripheral neuropathy) that would interfere with the assessment of safety and efficacy in this trial.
12. Inability to follow-up with post-operative study visits
13. Inability to speak or read English
1. Any disorder that precludes a surgical procedure (e.g., signs of sepsis or inadequately treated infection) or alters wound healing.
2. Receipt of antiplatelet agents for at least 10 days prior surgery.
3. Significant cognitive impairment based on investigator assessment during the eligibility evaluation period.
4. History of significant psychiatric illness, epilepsy, or Alzheimer's disease.
5. Active drug or alcohol abuse.
6. Pregnancy or lack of effective contraception in women of childbearing potential defined as one year post-menopausal or surgically sterile.
7. Any medical disability (e.g., severe degenerative arthritis, compromised nutritional state, severe peripheral neuropathy) that would interfere with the assessment of safety and efficacy in this trial.
8. Inability to follow-up with post-operative study visits
9. Inability to speak or read English
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MRI Interventions, Inc.
INDUSTRY
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philip Starr, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco; SFVAMC
Paul Larson, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco; SFVAMC
Jill L Ostrem, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California San Francisco, SFVAMC
Alastair J Martin, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
San Francisco VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martin AJ, Larson PS, Ostrem JL, Keith Sootsman W, Talke P, Weber OM, Levesque N, Myers J, Starr PA. Placement of deep brain stimulator electrodes using real-time high-field interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005 Nov;54(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20675.
Ostrem JL, Ziman N, Galifianakis NB, Starr PA, Luciano MS, Katz M, Racine CA, Martin AJ, Markun LC, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes using ClearPoint interventional MRI for deep brain stimulation lead placement in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):908-16. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS15173. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Starr PA, Markun LC, Larson PS, Volz MM, Martin AJ, Ostrem JL. Interventional MRI-guided deep brain stimulation in pediatric dystonia: first experience with the ClearPoint system. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Oct;14(4):400-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.PEDS13605. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
iMRI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id